e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
þ
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005
OR
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period
from to
Commission File Number
001-15149
Lennox International Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
42-0991521
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number) |
2140 Lake Park Blvd.
Richardson, Texas 75080
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code):
(972) 497-5000
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class |
|
Name of each exchange on which registered |
|
|
|
Common Stock, $.01 par value per share
|
|
New York Stock Exchange |
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate
by checkmark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer,
as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate
by checkmark if the registrant is not required to file reports
pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the last
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to
Item 405 of
Regulation S-K is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of
registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K or any
amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated
filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer (see
definition of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.)
Large Accelerated
Filer þ Accelerated
Filer o Non-Accelerated
Filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
As of June 30, 2005, the aggregate market value of the
common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was
$976,507,362 based on the closing price of the registrants
common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on such date. Common
stock held by non-affiliates excludes common stock held by the
registrants executive officers, directors and stockholders
whose ownership exceeds 5% of the common stock outstanding at
June 30, 2005. As of February 27, 2006, there were
71,400,844 shares of the registrants common stock
outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrants Proxy Statement to be filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with
the registrants 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be
held on April 20, 2006 are incorporated by reference into
Part III of this report.
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC.
FORM 10-K
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2005
INDEX
i
PART I
The Company
Lennox International Inc. (LII or the
Company), through its subsidiaries, is a leading
global provider of climate control solutions. The Company
designs, manufactures and markets a broad range of products for
the heating, ventilation, air conditioning and refrigeration
(HVACR) markets. LII has leveraged its expertise to
become an industry leader known for innovation, quality and
reliability. The Companys products and services are sold
through multiple distribution channels under well-established
brand names including Lennox, Armstrong
Air, Ducane, Bohn,
Larkin, Advanced Distributor Products,
Service Experts and others.
Shown below are the Companys four business segments, the
key products and brand names within each segment and
2005 net sales by segment. Segment financial data for the
years 2005, 2004 and 2003, including financial information about
foreign and domestic operations, is included in Note 3 of
the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in
Item B. Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
Products/Services |
|
Brand Names |
|
2005 Net Sales | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Millions) | |
Residential Heating & Cooling
|
|
Furnaces, air conditioners, heat pumps, packaged heating and
cooling systems, indoor air quality equipment, pre-fabricated
fireplaces and freestanding stoves |
|
Lennox, Armstrong Air, Ducane, Aire-Flo, AirEase, Concord,
Magic-Pak, Advanced Distributor Products (ADP), Superior,
Whitfield, Security Chimneys |
|
$ |
1,685.8 |
|
Commercial Heating & Cooling
|
|
Unitary heating and air conditioning equipment and applied
systems |
|
Lennox, Armstrong Air |
|
|
651.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Heating & Cooling |
|
|
|
|
2,337.5 |
|
Service Experts
|
|
Sales, installation and service of residential and light
commercial heating and cooling equipment |
|
Service Experts, various individual service center names |
|
|
641.4 |
|
Refrigeration
|
|
Chillers, condensing units, unit coolers, fluid coolers, air
cooled condensers and air handlers |
|
Bohn, Larkin, Climate Control, Chandler Refrigeration, Heatcraft
Worldwide Refrigeration, Friga-Bohn, HK Refrigeration, Kirby,
Lovelocks, Frigus-Bohn |
|
|
467.2 |
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(79.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,366.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company was founded in 1895 in Marshalltown, Iowa when Dave
Lennox, the owner of a machine repair business for the
railroads, successfully developed and patented a riveted steel
coal-fired furnace, which was substantially more durable than
the cast iron furnaces used at that time. Manufacturing these
furnaces grew into a significant business and was diverting the
Lennox Machine Shop from its core focus. As a result, in 1904, a
group of investors headed by D.W. Norris bought the furnace
business and named it the Lennox Furnace Company. In 1991, the
Company reincorporated as a Delaware corporation and completed
its initial public offering in 1999. Over the years, D.W. Norris
ensured ownership of the Company was distributed to succeeding
generations of his family. The Company believes a significant
portion of LIIs outstanding
1
common stock is currently broadly distributed among descendants
of, or persons otherwise related to, D.W. Norris.
Business Strategy
The Companys business strategy is designed to capitalize
on its competitive strengths in order to expand its
profitability and market share in the HVACR markets. The key
elements of this strategy include:
|
|
|
Profitable Growth in Heating & Cooling in North
America |
The Company intends to grow in the residential and light
commercial heating, ventilation and air conditioning
(HVAC) market in North America by:
|
|
|
|
|
improving replacement sales of commercial heating and cooling
equipment by enhancing distribution capabilities to shorten lead
times; |
|
|
|
introducing innovative new residential and commercial products; |
|
|
|
expanding the offering of residential and commercial Indoor Air
Quality (IAQ) related products and services; |
|
|
|
improving penetration and growing its share of original
equipment manufacturers purchases by Lennox independent
dealers; and |
|
|
|
expanding the geographic market presence of the Companys
Armstrong Air, Ducane and other brands of residential heating
and cooling products sold to distributors and wholesalers
through the addition of new customers. |
|
|
|
Exploit Global Refrigeration Opportunities |
The Company believes increasing international demand for
commercial refrigeration products presents substantial
opportunities. Refrigeration equipment generally has similar
designs and applications globally, and LII believes it can use
its domestic product knowledge and business model to grow
internationally. To take advantage of international
opportunities, the Company intends to promote organic growth
through investments in its international manufacturing and
distribution facilities, as well as explore opportunities for
joint ventures and strategic alliances to expand market
penetration.
|
|
|
Focus on Profitable Growth of Service Experts |
Company-owned heating and air conditioning contractors, also
referred to as dealer service centers, enable LII to extend its
distribution directly to the end consumer in the United States
and Canada, thereby permitting it to participate in the revenues
and margins available at the retail level. The Companys
dealer network is focused primarily on service and replacement
opportunities in residential and light commercial markets in
metropolitan areas, which the Company believes are more stable
and profitable than new construction. The Company has assembled
an experienced management team to manage the dealer operations.
A portfolio of management procedures and best practices,
including a training program for new general managers, common IT
systems and financial controls, regional accounting centers, an
inventory management program and a focus on service agreements,
is designed to enhance the quality, effectiveness and
profitability of this business. The Company believes the retail
sales and service market represents a significant growth
opportunity because it is large and highly fragmented, comprised
of approximately 85,000 contractors. While no significant
acquisitions are currently planned, the Company intends to
selectively expand and/or rationalize service centers to
optimize the performance of its dealer network.
2
Products and Services
|
|
|
Residential Heating & Cooling |
Heating & Cooling Products. The Company
manufactures and markets a broad range of furnaces, air
conditioners, heat pumps, packaged heating and cooling systems,
replacement parts and related products for both the residential
replacement and new construction markets in the United States
and Canada. These products are available in a variety of designs
and efficiency levels, and at a range of price points intended
to provide a complete line of home comfort systems. The Company
believes that by maintaining a broad product line marketed under
multiple brand names it can address different market segments
and penetrate multiple distribution channels.
The Lennox and Aire-Flo brands of
residential heating and air conditioning products are sold
directly to a network of approximately 7,000 installing dealers,
making the Company one of the largest wholesale distributors of
residential heating and air conditioning products in North
America. The Armstrong Air, Ducane,
AirEase, Concord, Magic-Pak
and Advanced Distributor Products brands are sold
through third party distributors.
The Companys Advanced Distributor Products operation
builds evaporator coils and air handlers under the
Advanced Distributor Products brand as well as the
Lennox, Armstrong Air,
AirEase, Concord and Ducane
brands. In addition to supplying the Company with components for
its heating and cooling products, Advanced Distributor Products
produces evaporator coils to be used in connection with
competitors heating and cooling products as an alternative
to such competitors brand name components. The Company has
achieved a significant share of the market for evaporator coils
through the application of its technological and manufacturing
skills, and customer service capabilities.
Hearth Products. The Companys hearth products
include prefabricated gas, wood burning and electric fireplaces,
free standing pellet and gas stoves, fireplace inserts, gas logs
and accessories. Many of the fireplaces are built with a blower
or fan option and are efficient heat sources as well as
attractive amenities to the home. The Company currently markets
its hearth products under the Lennox,
Superior, Whitfield and Security
Chimneys brand names.
|
|
|
Commercial Heating & Cooling |
North America. In North America, the Company sells
unitary heating and cooling equipment that is used in light
commercial applications, such as low-rise office buildings,
restaurants, retail centers, churches and schools, as opposed to
larger applied systems. The Companys product offerings for
these applications include rooftop units that range from two to
50 tons of cooling capacity and split system/air handler
combinations, which range from 1.5 to 20 tons, and are
distributed primarily through commercial contractors. The
Company believes the success of its products is attributable to
their efficiency, design flexibility, low life cycle cost, ease
of service and advanced control technology.
Europe. In Europe, the Company manufactures and sells
unitary products, which range from two to 30 tons, and
applied systems with up to 500 tons of cooling capacity.
LIIs European products consist of small package units,
rooftop units, chillers, air handlers and fan coils that serve
medium-rise commercial buildings, shopping malls, other retail
and entertainment buildings, institutional applications and
other field-engineered applications. LII manufactures heating
and cooling products in several locations in Europe and markets
these products through both direct and indirect distribution
channels in Europe, Russia and the Middle East.
Through approximately 130 Company-owned dealer service centers
in its Service Experts segment, the Company provides
installation, preventive maintenance, emergency repair and
replacement of heating and cooling systems directly to both
residential and light commercial customers in the United States
and Canada. In connection with these services, the Company sells
a wide range of equipment, parts and supplies manufactured by
LII and other non-LII
brands produced by third parties.
3
The Company manufactures and markets equipment for the global
commercial refrigeration market through subsidiaries organized
under the Heatcraft Worldwide Refrigeration name. These products
are sold to distributors, installing contractors and original
equipment manufacturers.
North America. The Companys commercial
refrigeration products for the North American market include
condensing units, unit coolers, fluid coolers, air cooled
condensers and air handlers. These products are sold for cold
storage applications, primarily to preserve food and other
perishables, and are used by supermarkets, convenience stores,
restaurants, warehouses and distribution centers. As part of its
sale of commercial refrigeration products, the Company routinely
provides application engineering for consulting engineers,
contractors and others.
International. In international markets, LII manufactures
and markets refrigeration products including condensing units,
unit coolers, air-cooled condensers, fluid coolers,
refrigeration racks and small chillers. The Company has
manufacturing locations in Europe, Australia, Brazil and China.
The Company also owns 50% of a joint venture in Mexico that
produces unit coolers and condensing units of the same design
and quality as those manufactured by the Company in the United
States. This venture produces a smaller range of products, and
therefore the product line is complemented with imports from the
United States, which are sold through the joint ventures
distribution network.
Marketing and Distribution
The Company utilizes multiple channels of distribution and
offers different brands at various price points in order to
better penetrate the HVACR markets. The Companys products
and services are sold through a combination of distributors,
independent and Company-owned dealer service centers,
wholesalers, manufacturers representatives, original
equipment manufacturers and national accounts. Dedicated sales
forces and manufacturers representatives are deployed
across all the Companys business segments and brands in a
manner designed to maximize their ability to service a
particular distribution channel. To maximize enterprise-wide
effectiveness, the Company has active cross-functional and
cross-organizational teams coordinating approaches to pricing,
product design, distribution and national account customers.
An example of the competitive strength of the Companys
marketing and distribution strategy is in the North American
residential heating and cooling market in which LII uses three
distinctly different distribution approaches: the one-step
distribution system, the two-step distribution system and sales
made directly to consumers. The Company distributes its
Lennox and Aire-Flo brands in a one-step
process directly to dealers that install these heating and
cooling products. The Company distributes its Armstrong
Air, Ducane, AirEase,
Concord, Magic-Pak and Advanced
Distributor Products brands through the traditional
two-step distribution process whereby it sells its products to
distributors who, in turn, sell the products to dealers and to
installing contractors. In addition, the Company provides
heating and cooling products and services directly to consumers
through Company-owned Service Experts dealer service centers.
Over the years, the Lennox brand has become
synonymous with Dave Lennox, a highly recognizable
advertising icon in the heating and cooling industry. The
Dave Lennox image is utilized in television and
print advertising, as well as in numerous locally produced
dealer ads, open houses and trade events.
Manufacturing
The Company operates manufacturing facilities in the United
States and throughout the world. LII has embraced
lean-manufacturing principles, a manufacturing philosophy which
reduces waste in manufactured products by shortening the
timeline between the customer order and delivery, across its
manufacturing operations, accompanied by initiatives to achieve
high product quality. In its facilities most impacted by
seasonal demand, the Company manufactures both heating and
cooling products to smooth seasonal production demands and
maintain a relatively stable labor force. The Company is
generally able to hire temporary employees to meet changes in
demand.
4
Strategic Sourcing
The Company relies on various suppliers to furnish the raw
materials and components used in the manufacturing of its
products. To maximize its buying effectiveness in the
marketplace, the Company has developed a central strategic
sourcing group that consolidates required purchases of materials
and components across business segments. The strategic sourcing
group generally concentrates purchases for a given material or
component with one or two suppliers, although the Company
believes there are alternative suppliers for all of its key raw
material and component needs. Compressors, motors and controls
constitute the Companys most significant component
purchases, while steel, copper and aluminum account for the bulk
of the Companys raw material purchases. The Company owns a
24.5% interest in a joint venture that manufactures compressors
in the 1.5 to 6.5 horsepower range. This joint venture provides
the Company with the majority of its domestic compressor
requirements for its unitary residential and commercial cooling
equipment.
Research and Development and Technology
An important part of LIIs growth strategy is continued
investment in research and product development to both develop
new products as well as make improvements to existing product
lines. As a result, the Company spent an aggregate of
$40.3 million, $37.6 million and $38.0 million on
research and development during 2005, 2004 and 2003,
respectively. The Company has designated a number of its
facilities as centers for excellence that are
responsible for the research and development of core
competencies vital to its success, such as heat transfer, indoor
air quality and materials used in the construction and
application of its products. Technological advances are
disseminated from these centers for excellence to
LIIs operating divisions, as appropriate. The Company uses
advanced, commercially available computer-aided design,
computer-aided manufacturing, computational fluid dynamics and
other sophisticated software not only to streamline the design
and manufacturing processes, but also to run complex computer
simulations on a product design before a working prototype is
created. The Company operates a full line of metalworking
equipment and advanced laboratories certified by applicable
industry associations.
Seasonal Nature of Business
Total Company sales and related segment income tend to be
seasonally higher in the second and third quarters of the year
because, in the U.S. and Canada, summer is the peak season for
sales of air conditioning equipment and services.
Patents and Trademarks
The Company holds numerous patents that relate to the design and
use of its products. The Company considers these patents
important, but no single patent is material to the overall
conduct of its business. The Companys policy is to obtain
and protect patents whenever such action would be beneficial.
The Company owns or licenses several trademarks it considers
important in the marketing of its products, including
Lennox®,
Armstrong
Airtm,
Ducanetm,
Advanced Distributor
Products®,
Aire-Flotm,
AirEase®,
Concord®,
Magic-Pak®,
Superior®,
Whitfield®,
Earth
Stovetm,
Security
Chimneystm,
Service
Experts®,
Bohn®,
Larkintm,
Climate
Controltm,
Chandler
Refrigeration®,
Kirbytm,
Heatcraft Worldwide
Refrigerationtm,
Lovelockstm,
HK Refrigerationtm,
Frigus-Bohntm
and
Friga-Bohntm.
These trademarks have no fixed expiration date and the Company
believes its rights in these trademarks are adequately protected.
Competition
Essentially all markets in which the Company participates are
highly competitive. The most significant competitive factors
facing the Company are product reliability, product performance,
service and price, with the relative importance of these factors
varying among its businesses. In its Service Experts segment,
the Company faces competition from independent dealers, as well
as dealers owned by utility companies and other consumer
services providers. Listed below are some of the companies LII
views as significant competitors in each segment it serves, with
relevant brand names, when different than the company name,
shown in parentheses.
5
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Heating & Cooling United
Technologies Corp. (Carrier, Bryant, Tempstar, Comfortmaker,
Heil, Areoaire, Keeprite); Goodman Manufacturing Company, L.P.
(Janitrol, Amana); American Standard Companies Inc. (Trane,
American Standard); Paloma Co., Ltd. (Rheem, Ruud); Johnson
Controls, Inc. (York, Weatherking); Nordyne (Westinghouse,
Frigidaire, Tappan, Philco, Kelvinator, Gibson); HNI Corporation
(Heatilator, Heat-n-Glo); CFM Corporation (Majestic). |
|
|
|
Commercial Heating & Cooling United
Technologies Corp. (Carrier); American Standard Companies Inc.
(Trane); Johnson Controls, Inc. (York); AAON, Inc.; Daikin
Industries, Ltd.; McQuay International. |
|
|
|
Service Experts The ServiceMaster Company (ARS, AMS). |
|
|
|
Refrigeration United Technologies Corp. (Carrier);
Ingersoll-Rand Company Limited (Hussmann); Tecumseh Products
Company; Emerson Electric Co. (Copeland). |
Employees
As of December 31, 2005, the Company employed approximately
16,000 employees, of whom approximately 5,000 were salaried
and 11,000 were hourly. The number of hourly workers the Company
employs may vary in order to match its labor needs during
periods of fluctuating demand. Approximately
4,000 employees are represented by unions. The Company
believes its relationships with its employees and with the
unions representing certain of its employees are generally good
and does not anticipate any material adverse consequences
resulting from negotiations to renew any collective bargaining
agreements.
On October 6, 2005, Lennox Industries Inc., a subsidiary of
the Company, announced that it had ratified a collective
bargaining agreement with The International Union United
Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of
America (UAW) Local 893, Unit 11 with
respect to its Marshalltown, Iowa manufacturing facility, a
major manufacturer of residential air conditioning and heating
equipment. The previous collective bargaining agreement between
Lennox Industries Inc. and the UAW expired by its terms on
October 31, 2004; however, the employees at the
Marshalltown facility continued to work under its terms until
the new collective bargaining agreement was ratified.
Environmental Regulation
The Companys operations are subject to evolving and often
increasingly stringent international, federal, state, and local
laws and regulations concerning the environment. Environmental
laws that affect or could affect the Companys domestic
operations include, among others, the National Appliance Energy
Conservation Act of 1987, as amended (NAECA), the
Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act, the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act, the National Environmental
Policy Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act, any regulations
promulgated under these acts and various other international,
federal, state and local laws and regulations governing
environmental matters. The Company believes it is in substantial
compliance with such existing environmental laws and regulations
and does not expect that any compliance measures taken by the
Company will have a material effect on the Companys
capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position in fiscal
2006.
Energy Efficiency. The Company is subject to appliance
efficiency regulations promulgated under NAECA and various state
regulations concerning the energy efficiency of its products. As
of January 23, 2006, all residential central air
conditioners manufactured after such date must comply with a
minimum 13 seasonal energy efficiency rating, or
SEER, standard under NAECA. The Company has
successfully developed energy-efficient products that meet this
standard. Similar new standards are being promulgated for
commercial air conditioning and refrigeration equipment. The
Company is actively involved in participation of the development
of these new standards and is prepared to have product in place
in advance of the implementation of all such regulations being
considered by the Department of Energy.
Refrigerants. The use of hydrochlorofluorocarbons, or
HCFCs, as a refrigerant for air conditioning and
refrigeration equipment is common practice in the industry.
However, international and country specific regulations require
the use of certain substances deemed to be ozone depleting,
including HCFCs, to be
6
phased out over a particular period of time. Under the Clean Air
Act and implementing regulations, the use of all HCFCs in new
equipment within the U.S. must be phased out by 2010. The
Company, together with major chemical manufacturers, is
reviewing and addressing the potential impact of these
regulations on its product offerings and has developed and
continues to develop new products that replace the use of HCFCs
with the widely accepted Hydroflurocarbons, or HFCs,
and other approved substitutes. LII has been an active
participant in the ongoing international dialogue on this
subject and believes it is well positioned to react in a timely
manner to any changes in the regulatory landscape. In addition,
the Company is taking proactive steps to implement responsible
use principles and guidelines with respect to limiting
refrigerants from escaping into the atmosphere throughout the
life span of HVAC and refrigeration equipment.
Remediation Activity. In addition to affecting the
Companys ongoing operations, applicable environmental laws
can impose obligations to remediate hazardous substances at
LIIs properties, at properties formerly owned or operated
by the Company and at facilities to which it has sent or sends
waste for treatment or disposal. The Company is aware of
contamination at some of its facilities; however, the Company
does not presently believe that any future remediation costs at
such facilities will be material to the Companys results
of operations.
The Company has received notices in the past that it is a
potentially responsible party along with other potentially
responsible parties in Superfund proceedings under the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Act for cleanup of hazardous substances at certain sites to
which the potentially responsible parties are alleged to have
sent waste. Based on the facts presently known, the Company does
not believe environmental cleanup costs associated with any
Superfund sites where the Company has received notice that it is
a potentially responsible party will be material.
European WEEE and RoHS Compliance. Beginning in August
2005, various electrical and electronic equipment sold in the
European Union (EU) is required to comply with the
Directive on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment
(WEEE) and, as of July 2006, such equipment must
also comply with the Directive on Restriction of Use of Certain
Hazardous Substances (RoHS). WEEE aims to prevent
waste by encouraging reuse and recycling and RoHS restricts the
use of six hazardous substances in electrical and electronic
products. All HVAC and refrigeration products and certain
components of such products put in the market in the
EU (whether or not manufactured in the EU) are potentially
subject to WEEE and RoHS. Because all HVAC and refrigeration
manufacturers selling within or from the EU are subject to the
standards promulgated under WEEE and RoHS, LII believes that
neither WEEE nor RoHS uniquely impact the Company as compared to
such other manufacturers. Similar directives are being
introduced in other parts of the world, including the United
States. For example, the California Electronic Waste Recycling
Act is already in effect and both China and Japan are expected
to implement local equivalents to RoHS around the same time as
the EU. The Company is actively monitoring the development of
such directives and believes it is well positioned to comply
with WEEE and RoHS as well as similar directives in the required
time frames.
Available Information
The Companys web site address is
www.lennoxinternational.com. The Company makes available, free
of charge through this web site, its annual report on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q, current
reports on
Form 8-K and
amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after such material
is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the SEC).
Certifications
The Companys Chief Executive Officer submitted the 2005
New York Stock Exchange (the NYSE) Annual CEO
Certification regarding the Companys compliance with the
NYSEs corporate governance listing standards to the NYSE
on May 13, 2005.
The certifications of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company pursuant to Section 302
and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 are filed
and furnished, respectively, as exhibits to this
Form 10-K.
7
Executive Officers of the Company
The executive officers of the Company, their present positions
and their ages are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age | |
|
Position |
|
|
| |
|
|
John W. Norris, Jr.
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
Chairman of the Board |
Robert E. Schjerven
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
Harry J. Ashenhurst, Ph.D
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer and
Interim President and Chief Operating Officer, Worldwide
Refrigeration |
Scott J. Boxer
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
Executive Vice President and President and Chief Operating
Officer, Service Experts |
Susan K. Carter
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Linda A. Goodspeed
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer |
Robert J. McDonough
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
Executive Vice President and President and Chief Operating
Officer, Worldwide Heating & Cooling |
William F. Stoll, Jr.
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary |
David L. Inman
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |
The following biographies describe the business experience of
the Companys executive officers:
John W. Norris, Jr. was elected Chairman of the
Board of Directors of the Company in 1991. He has served as a
director of the Company since 1966. After joining the Company in
1960, Mr. Norris held a variety of key positions including
Vice President of Marketing, President of Lennox Industries
(Canada) Ltd., a subsidiary of the Company, and Corporate Senior
Vice President. He became President of the Company in 1977 and
was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company in 1980, serving through 2001. Mr. Norris is on the
Board of Directors of the Air-Conditioning &
Refrigeration Institute, of which he was Chairman in 1986. He is
also an active Board member of the Gas Appliance Manufacturers
Association, where he was Chairman from 1980 to 1981. He is a
past Chairman of The Nature Conservancy of Texas Board of
Trustees and also serves as a director of AmerUs Group Co., a
life insurance and annuity company. Mr. Norris will retire
from the Companys Board of Directors effective
July 21, 2006.
Robert E. Schjerven was named Chief Executive Officer of
the Company in 2001 and has served on the Board of Directors
since that time. Prior to his appointment as Chief Executive
Officer, he served as Chief Operating Officer of the Company in
2000 and as President and Chief Operating Officer of Lennox
Industries Inc., a subsidiary of the Company, from 1995 to 2000.
He joined the Company in 1986 as Vice President of Marketing and
Engineering for Heatcraft Inc., a subsidiary of the Company.
From 1988 to 1991, he held the position of Vice President and
General Manager of Heatcraft. From 1991 to 1995, he served as
President and Chief Operating Officer of Armstrong Air
Conditioning Inc., a subsidiary of the Company.
Mr. Schjerven spent the first 20 years of his career
with The Trane Company, an international manufacturer and
marketer of HVAC systems, and McQuay-Perfex Inc.
Harry J. Ashenhurst was appointed Chief Administrative
Officer in 2000. Dr. Ashenhurst joined the Company in 1989
as Vice President of Human Resources, was named Executive Vice
President, Human Resources of the Company in 1990 and in 1994
became Executive Vice President, Human Resources and
Administration and assumed responsibility for the public
relations and communications and aviation departments.
Dr. Ashenhurst is also responsible for risk management,
corporate safety, facilities and government affairs. On
June 2, 2005, Dr. Ashenhurst assumed additional
responsibilities as interim President and Chief Operating
Officer of the Companys Worldwide Refrigeration segment,
while the Company
8
conducts an internal and external search for a permanent
replacement. Prior to joining the Company, Dr. Ashenhurst
worked as an independent management consultant with the
consulting firm of Roher, Hibler and Replogle.
Scott J. Boxer joined the Company in 1998 as Executive
Vice President, Lennox Global Ltd., a subsidiary of the Company,
and President, European Operations. He was appointed President
of Lennox Industries Inc., a subsidiary of the Company, in 2000
and was named President and Chief Operating Officer of the
Companys Service Experts segment in July 2003. Prior to
joining the Company, Mr. Boxer spent 26 years with
York International Corporation, a HVACR manufacturer, in various
roles, including President, Unitary Products Group Worldwide,
where he reported directly to the Chairman of that company and
directed residential and light commercial heating and air
conditioning operations worldwide. Mr. Boxer is an
Executive Board Member of the Air-Conditioning &
Refrigeration Institute and Chairman of the Board of Trustees of
North American Technical Excellence, Inc.
Susan K. Carter was appointed Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer in August 2004. Ms. Carter also
served as Treasurer of the Company from August 2004 through
September 2005. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Carter
was Vice President of Finance and Chief Accounting Officer of
Cummins, Inc., a global power leader and manufacturer of
engines, electric power generation systems, and engine-related
products from 2002 to 2004. From 1996 to 2002, Ms. Carter
served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Transportation & Power Systems and held other senior
financial management positions at Honeywell, Inc., formerly
AlliedSignal, Inc. She also previously served in senior
financial management positions at Crane Co. and DeKalb
Corporation.
Linda A. Goodspeed was appointed Executive Vice President
and Chief Technology Officer in September 2001. Prior to joining
the Company, Ms. Goodspeed served as President and Chief
Operating Officer of Partminer, Inc., a privately held
electronics
business-to-business
supply chain parts and service company from 2000 to 2001.
Beginning her career in engineering with Ford Motor Company in
1984, Ms. Goodspeed moved to Nissan research and
development in 1989 and joined General Electric (GE)
Appliances in 1996. She became GEs Range Product
Development Manager in 1997 and was promoted to Product General
Manager in 1999. She also became General Manager in 1999 for Six
Sigma, managing a team of 160 GE quality leaders spanning
operations across the company.
Robert J. McDonough was named President and Chief
Operating Officer of Worldwide Heating & Cooling in
July 2003. Previously, he had served as President, Worldwide
Refrigeration and International Operations since 2001.
Mr. McDonough joined Heatcraft, Inc., a subsidiary of the
Company, in 1990 as a Division Sales Manager, when the Company
acquired Larkin Coils. He was named Director of Sales in 1992
and became Vice President and General Manager of the
Refrigeration Products Division in 1995. In 2000, he was
appointed President, Worldwide Commercial Refrigeration.
Mr. McDonough held a number of sales positions at Larkin
Coils before becoming National Sales Manager in 1987.
William F. Stoll, Jr. became Executive Vice
President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary of the Company in
March 2004. Most recently, Mr. Stoll served as Executive
Vice President and Chief Legal Officer of Borden, Inc. from 1996
to 2003. Prior to his career with Borden, Inc., he worked for
21 years with Westinghouse Electric Corporation, becoming
Vice President and Deputy General Counsel in 1993.
David L. Inman was named Vice President, Controller and
Chief Accounting Officer for the Company in 2001. Previously, he
served as Vice President and Group Controller of North American
Distributed Products from 2000 to 2001. Mr. Inman has held
multiple positions in accounting, internal audit and financial
systems within the Company since 1978 including Controller of
Armstrong Air Conditioning Inc., a subsidiary of the Company.
Item 1A. Risk
Factors
References in this item to we, our or
us refer to Lennox International Inc. and its
subsidiaries, unless the context requires otherwise.
9
Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on
Form 10-K contains
forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, that are based on information currently available to
management as well as managements assumptions and beliefs.
All statements, other than statements of historical fact,
included in this
Form 10-K
constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including but
not limited to statements identified by the words
may, will, should,
plan, predict, anticipate,
believe, intend, estimate
and expect and similar expressions. Such statements
reflect our current views with respect to future events, based
on what we believe are reasonable assumptions; however, such
statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties. In
addition to the specific uncertainties discussed elsewhere in
this Form 10-K,
the risk factors set forth below may affect our performance and
results of operations. Should one or more of these risks or
uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions
prove incorrect, actual results may differ materially from those
in the forward-looking statements. We disclaim any intention or
obligation to update or review any forward-looking statements or
information, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise.
Risk Factors
The following risk factors and other information included in
this Form 10-K
should be carefully considered. We believe these are the
principal material risks currently facing our business, however,
additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or
that we presently deem less significant may also impair our
business operations. If any of the following risks actually
occur, our business, financial condition or results of
operations could be materially adversely affected.
|
|
|
Cooler than Normal Summers and Warmer than Normal Winters
May Depress Our Sales. |
Demand for our products and for our services is strongly
affected by the weather. Cooler than normal summers depress our
sales of replacement air conditioning and refrigeration products
and warmer than normal winters have the same effect on our
heating products.
|
|
|
Implementation of the New Minimum Efficiency Standard for
Residential Air Conditioners Mandated by NAECA Could Adversely
Impact Our Results of Operations. |
We are subject to appliance efficiency regulations promulgated
under NAECA and various state regulations concerning the energy
efficiency of our products. As of January 23, 2006, all
residential central air conditioners manufactured after such
date must comply with a minimum 13 SEER standard under
NAECA. This standard increased the minimum SEER standard by
30 percent. We are currently in compliance with the new
standard; however, air conditioning products with ratings lower
than 13 SEER manufactured prior to January 23, 2006
can continue to be sold legally after that date. Therefore,
quantities of non-13 SEER compliant product that remain in
the industrys distribution pipeline after January 23,
2006 may have an adverse effect on our operating results during
the 2006 cooling season. We are unable to predict the extent to
which this may occur. Similar new standards are being
promulgated for commercial air conditioning and refrigeration
equipment. Implementation of the new 13 SEER minimum
efficiency standard for residential air conditioners and any new
standards for commercial air conditioning and refrigeration
equipment could adversely impact our results of operations, due
to lower factory productivity, increased costs of production and
distribution, potential margin pressures, increased costs
related to warranty and product liability claims and higher
levels of working capital and we may not be able to realize the
price increases required to offset the increases in cost of
goods sold.
|
|
|
We May Incur Substantial Costs as a Result of Warranty and
Product Liability Claims Which Could Negatively Affect Our
Profitability. |
The development, manufacture, sale and use of our products
involve risks of warranty and product liability claims. In
addition, because we own installing heating and air conditioning
dealers in the United
10
States and Canada, we incur the risk of liability claims for the
installation and service of heating and air conditioning
products. Our product liability insurance policies have limits
that, if exceeded, may result in substantial costs that would
have an adverse effect on our future profitability. In addition,
warranty claims are not covered by our product liability
insurance and certain product liability claims may not be
covered by our product liability insurance either.
|
|
|
Our Business Could be Adversely Affected by an Economic
Downturn. |
Our business is affected by a number of economic factors,
including the level of economic activity in the markets in which
we operate. Our sales in the residential and commercial new
construction market correlate to the number of new homes and
buildings that are built, which in turn is influenced by
cyclical factors such as interest rates, inflation, consumer
spending habits, employment rates and other macroeconomic
factors over which we have no control. In the HVACR business, a
decline in economic activity as a result of these cyclical or
other factors typically results in a decline in new construction
and replacement purchases, which could result in a decrease in
our sales and profitability.
|
|
|
We May Not be Able to Compete Favorably in the Highly
Competitive HVACR Business. |
Substantially all of the markets in which we operate are highly
competitive. The most significant competitive factors we face
are product reliability, product performance, service and price,
with the relative importance of these factors varying among our
product lines. Other factors that affect competition in the
HVACR market include the development and application of new
technologies, an increasing emphasis on the development of more
efficient HVACR products, and new product introductions. Our
competitors may have greater financial resources than we have,
allowing them to invest in more extensive research and
development and/or marketing activity. In addition, our Service
Experts segment faces competition from independent dealers and
dealers owned by utility companies and other consumer service
providers, some of whom may be able to provide their products or
services at lower prices than we can. We may not be able to
compete successfully against current and future competitors and
current and future competitive pressures may cause us to reduce
our prices or lose market share, or could negatively affect our
cash flow, which could have an adverse effect on our future
financial results.
|
|
|
We May Not be Able to Successfully Develop and Market New
Products. |
Our future success depends on our continued investment in
research and new product development and our ability to
commercialize new technological advances in the HVACR industry.
If we are unable to continue to successfully develop and market
new products or to achieve technological advances on a pace
consistent with that of our competitors, our business and
results of operations could be adversely impacted.
|
|
|
We Use a Variety of Raw Materials and Components in Our
Business and Price Increases or Significant Supply Interruptions
Could Increase Our Operating Costs and/or Depress Sales. |
We depend on raw materials, such as copper, aluminum and steel,
and components purchased from third parties. We generally
concentrate purchases for a given raw material or component with
one or two suppliers. Although we believe there are alternative
suppliers for all of our key raw material and component needs,
if a supplier is unable or unwilling to meet our supply
requirements, we could experience supply interruptions or cost
increases, either of which could have an adverse effect on our
gross profit. In addition, although we regularly pre-purchase a
portion of our raw materials at a fixed price each year to hedge
against price increases, a large increase in raw materials
prices could significantly increase our cost of goods sold.
Increases in the prices or quantities of raw materials or
components we require or significant supply interruptions could
affect the prices we charge for our products and services
negatively impacting our competitive position, which may result
in depressed sales.
11
|
|
|
Because a Significant Percentage of Our Workforce is
Unionized, We Face Risks of Work Stoppages and Other Labor
Relations Problems. |
As of December 31, 2005, approximately 24% of our workforce
was unionized. As we expand our operations, we may be subject to
increased unionization of our workforce. While we believe our
relationships with the unions representing our employees are
generally good, the results of future negotiations with these
unions and the effects of any production interruptions or labor
stoppages could have an adverse effect on our financial results.
|
|
|
We are Subject to Litigation and Environmental Regulations
that Could Have an Adverse Effect on Our Results of
Operations. |
We are involved in various claims and lawsuits incidental to our
business, including those involving product liability, labor
relations and environmental matters, some of which claim
significant damages. Given the inherent uncertainty of
litigation, we cannot be certain that existing litigation or any
future adverse developments will not have a material adverse
impact on our financial condition. In addition, we are subject
to extensive and changing federal, state and local laws and
regulations designed to protect the environment. These laws and
regulations could impose liability for remediation costs and
civil or criminal penalties in cases of non-compliance.
Compliance with environmental laws increases our costs of doing
business. Because these laws are subject to frequent change, we
are unable to predict the future costs resulting from
environmental compliance.
|
|
|
Any Future Determination that a Significant Impairment of
the Value of Our Goodwill Intangible Asset has Occurred Could
Have a Material Adverse Affect on Our Results of
Operations. |
As of December 31, 2005, we had goodwill, net of
accumulated amortization, of approximately $223.9 million
on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. Any future determination that
a significant impairment of the value of goodwill has occurred
would require a write-down of the impaired portion of
unamortized goodwill to fair value, which would reduce our
assets and stockholders equity and could have a material
adverse affect on our results of operations.
|
|
|
We May Not be Able to Successfully Integrate and Operate
Businesses that We may Acquire. |
From time to time, we may seek to complement or expand our
business through strategic acquisitions. The success of these
transactions will depend, in part, on our ability to integrate
and operate the acquired businesses profitably. If we are unable
to successfully integrate acquisitions with our operations, we
may not realize the anticipated benefits associated with such
transactions, which could adversely affect our business and
results of operations.
12
|
|
Item 1B. |
Unresolved Staff Comments |
None.
The following chart lists the Companys major domestic and
international manufacturing, distribution and office facilities
and indicates the business segment that uses such facilities,
the approximate size of such facilities and whether such
facilities are owned or leased:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location |
|
Segment |
|
Approx. Sq. Ft. | |
|
Owned/Leased | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) | |
|
|
Richardson, TX
|
|
Headquarters |
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
Owned & Leased |
|
Marshalltown, IA
|
|
Residential Heating & Cooling |
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
|
Owned & Leased |
|
Bellevue, OH
|
|
Residential Heating & Cooling |
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
Blackville, SC
|
|
Residential Heating & Cooling |
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
Orangeburg, SC
|
|
Residential Heating & Cooling |
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
Grenada, MS
|
|
Residential Heating & Cooling |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
Union City, TN
|
|
Residential Heating & Cooling |
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
Lynwood, CA
|
|
Residential Heating & Cooling |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
Orange, CA
|
|
Residential Heating & Cooling |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
Laval, Canada
|
|
Residential Heating & Cooling |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
Des Moines, IA
|
|
Residential & Commercial Heating & Cooling |
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
Stuttgart, AR
|
|
Commercial Heating & Cooling |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
Prague, Czech Republic
|
|
Commercial Heating & Cooling |
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
Longvic, France
|
|
Commercial Heating & Cooling |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
Mions, France
|
|
Commercial Heating & Cooling |
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
Burgos, Spain
|
|
Commercial Heating & Cooling |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
Danville, IL
|
|
Refrigeration |
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
Tifton, GA
|
|
Refrigeration |
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
Stone Mountain, GA
|
|
Refrigeration |
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
Milperra, Australia
|
|
Refrigeration |
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
Genas, France
|
|
Refrigeration |
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
San Jose dos Campos, Brazil
|
|
Refrigeration |
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
Auckland, New Zealand
|
|
Refrigeration |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
Barcelona, Spain
|
|
Refrigeration |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
Krunkel, Germany
|
|
Refrigeration |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
Wuxi, China
|
|
Refrigeration |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
Carrollton, TX
|
|
Research & Development facility |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
In addition to the properties described above and excluding
dealer facilities, the Company leases over 55 facilities in the
United States for use as sales offices and district warehouses
and additional facilities worldwide for use as sales and service
offices and regional warehouses. The vast majority of the
Company-owned service center facilities in LIIs Service
Experts segment are leased. The Company believes that its
properties are in good condition, suitable and adequate for its
present requirements and that its principal plants are generally
adequate to meet its production needs.
13
As previously disclosed, on February 7, 2006, Allied Air
Enterprises, a division of LIIs Heating & Cooling
business, announced that it has commenced plans to close its
current operations in Bellevue, Ohio. The consolidation will be
a phased process expected to be completed by the end of the
first quarter of fiscal 2007.
|
|
Item 3. |
Legal Proceedings |
The Company is involved in various claims and lawsuits
incidental to its business. In addition, the Company and its
subsidiary Heatcraft Inc. have been named in four lawsuits in
connection with its former heat transfer operations. The
lawsuits allege personal injury resulting from alleged emissions
of trichloroethylene, dichloroethylene, and vinyl chloride and
other unspecified emissions from the South Plant in Grenada,
Mississippi, previously owned by Heatcraft Inc. The Mississippi
Supreme Court has ordered that these four lawsuits be severed
and transferred to Grenada County. This will require
plaintiffs counsel to maintain a separate lawsuit for each
of the approximately 112 original plaintiffs. Since the court
order, there has been no action taken towards instigating the
individual lawsuits. It is not possible to predict with
certainty the outcome of these matters or an estimate of any
potential loss. Based on present knowledge, management believes
that it is unlikely that any final resolution of these matters
will result in a material liability for the Company.
In March 2004, the Company announced that the Audit Committee of
the Companys Board of Directors initiated an independent
inquiry into certain accounting matters related to the
Companys Canadian service centers in its Service Experts
segment. Immediately prior to such announcement, the Company
contacted the Fort Worth office of the SEC to inform them
of the existence and details of such allegations and the related
independent inquiry. Independent counsel for the Audit Committee
communicated the results of the independent inquiry to the SEC.
On January 31, 2005, the Company announced the SEC
investigation was converted to a formal status and the Company
continues to fully cooperate with the SEC by producing
information and documentation in response to requests from the
SEC. The Company is unable to predict the ultimate outcome of
this matter.
|
|
Item 4. |
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
No matters were submitted to a vote of stockholders of the
Company during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005.
14
PART II
|
|
Item 5. |
Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related
Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities |
The Companys common stock is listed for trading on the New
York Stock Exchange under the symbol LII. The high
and low sales prices for the Companys common stock for
each quarterly period during 2005 and 2004 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price Range Per Common Share | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
First Quarter
|
|
$ |
22.99 |
|
|
$ |
19.33 |
|
|
$ |
19.22 |
|
|
$ |
14.75 |
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
22.41 |
|
|
|
18.65 |
|
|
|
19.26 |
|
|
|
15.34 |
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
27.42 |
|
|
|
20.50 |
|
|
|
18.31 |
|
|
|
14.74 |
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
30.60 |
|
|
|
24.81 |
|
|
|
20.50 |
|
|
|
13.97 |
|
During 2005 and 2004, the Company declared quarterly cash
dividends as set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends per | |
|
|
Common Share | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
First Quarter
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
.095 |
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
.095 |
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
.095 |
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
.100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount and timing of dividend payments are determined by the
Companys Board of Directors and subject to certain
restrictions under the Companys credit agreements. As of
the close of business on February 27, 2006, there were
approximately 879 record holders of the Companys common
stock.
The Company expects quarterly dividends will continue to be paid
in 2006. On March 13, 2006, the Companys Board of
Directors approved a cash dividend of $0.11 per share of
outstanding common stock. The dividend will be paid on
April 7, 2006 to all common stockholders of record as of
March 24, 2006.
On September 19, 2005, the Company announced that the Board
of Directors (i) authorized a stock repurchase program,
pursuant to which the Company may repurchase up to ten million
shares of the Companys common stock, from time to time,
through open market-purchases; and (ii) terminated a prior
repurchase program that was announced November 2, 1999. In
the fourth quarter of 2005, the Company made the following
repurchases of common stock under the new stock repurchase
program:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of | |
|
Maximum Number | |
|
|
Total | |
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as | |
|
of Shares that may | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
Average Price | |
|
Part of Publicly | |
|
yet be Purchased | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Paid per Share | |
|
Announced Plans or | |
|
Under the Plans or | |
Period |
|
Purchased | |
|
(including fees) | |
|
Programs | |
|
Programs | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
October 1 through
October 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000,000 |
|
November 1 through November 30
|
|
|
447,400 |
|
|
$ |
28.65 |
|
|
|
447,400 |
|
|
|
9,552,600 |
|
December 1 through December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,552,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
447,400 |
|
|
$ |
28.65 |
|
|
|
447,400 |
|
|
|
9,552,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Item 6. |
Selected Financial Data (unaudited) |
The table below shows the selected financial data of the Company
for the five years ended December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions, except per share data) | |
Statements of Operations Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
$ |
3,366.2 |
|
|
$ |
2,982.7 |
|
|
$ |
2,789.9 |
|
|
$ |
2,727.4 |
|
|
$ |
2,802.7 |
|
Operational (Loss) Income From Continuing Operations
|
|
|
253.4 |
|
|
|
(36.6 |
) |
|
|
157.8 |
|
|
|
101.3 |
|
|
|
(7.3 |
) |
Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations
|
|
|
152.1 |
|
|
|
(93.5 |
) |
|
|
86.7 |
|
|
|
(209.5 |
) |
|
|
(46.6 |
) |
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
|
150.7 |
|
|
|
(134.4 |
) |
|
|
86.4 |
|
|
|
(203.5 |
) |
|
|
(40.6 |
) |
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share From Continuing Operations
|
|
|
2.13 |
|
|
|
(1.56 |
) |
|
|
1.36 |
|
|
|
0.66 |
|
|
|
(0.83 |
) |
Dividends Per Share
|
|
|
0.41 |
|
|
|
0.385 |
|
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
|
0.38 |
|
Other Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures
|
|
$ |
63.3 |
|
|
$ |
40.3 |
|
|
$ |
39.7 |
|
|
$ |
22.4 |
|
|
$ |
16.6 |
|
Research & Development Expenses
|
|
|
40.3 |
|
|
|
37.6 |
|
|
|
38.0 |
|
|
|
38.2 |
|
|
|
37.3 |
|
Balance Sheet Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$ |
1,737.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,518.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,720.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,510.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,793.4 |
|
Total Debt
|
|
|
120.5 |
|
|
|
310.5 |
|
|
|
362.3 |
|
|
|
379.9 |
|
|
|
517.8 |
|
Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
794.4 |
|
|
|
472.9 |
|
|
|
577.7 |
|
|
|
433.6 |
|
|
|
654.0 |
|
In 2004, the Company recorded a non-cash goodwill impairment
charge of $208.0 million, which is included as a component
of operating income in the accompanying Consolidated Statements
of Operations. Upon the adoption of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 142 Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets (SFAS No. 142) on
January 1, 2002, the Company recorded a $283.7 million
($247.9 million, net of tax) goodwill impairment charge.
See further discussion in Note 2 Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
|
|
Item 7. |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations |
Overview
Lennox International Inc. (LII or the
Company) participates in four reportable business
segments of the heating, ventilation, air conditioning and
refrigeration (HVACR) industry. The first reportable
segment is Residential Heating & Cooling, in which LII
manufactures and markets a full line of heating, air
conditioning and hearth products for the residential replacement
and new construction markets in the United States and Canada.
The second reportable segment is Commercial Heating &
Cooling, in which LII manufactures and sells primarily rooftop
products and related equipment for light commercial applications
in the United States and primarily rooftop products, chillers
and air handlers in Europe. Combined, the Residential
Heating & Cooling and Commercial Heating &
Cooling segments form LIIs Heating & Cooling
business. The third reportable segment is Service Experts, which
includes sales and installation of, and maintenance and repair
services for, HVAC equipment. The fourth reportable segment is
Refrigeration, in which LII manufactures and sells unit coolers,
condensing units and other commercial refrigeration products.
LIIs customers include distributors, installing dealers,
property owners, national accounts and original equipment
manufacturers. LII recognizes sales revenue when products are
shipped or when services are rendered. The demand for LIIs
products and services is influenced by national and regional
economic and demographic factors, such as interest rates, the
availability of financing, regional population and employment
trends, new construction, general economic conditions and
consumer confidence. In addition to economic cycles, demand for
LIIs products and services is seasonal and dependent on
the weather. Hotter than normal
16
summers generate strong demand for replacement air conditioning
and refrigeration products and services and colder than normal
winters have the same effect on heating products and services.
Conversely, cooler than normal summers and warmer than normal
winters depress HVACR sales and services.
The principal components of cost of goods sold in LIIs
manufacturing operations are component costs, raw materials,
factory overhead, labor and estimated costs of warranty expense.
In LIIs Service Experts segment, the principal components
of cost of goods sold are equipment, parts and supplies and
labor. The principal raw materials used in LIIs
manufacturing processes are steel, copper and aluminum. Higher
prices for these commodities and related components continue to
present a challenge to LII. Commodity prices and related
component costs in LIIs manufacturing businesses increased
by approximately $67 million for the year ended
December 31, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004. LII
mitigated the impact of higher commodity prices in 2005 through
a combination of price increases, commodity futures contracts,
improved production efficiency and cost reduction initiatives.
Warranty expense is estimated based on historical trends and
other factors.
Continuing to improve the performance of the Service Experts
business segment remains a top priority of LIIs
management. Initiatives within the Service Experts business
segment in 2005 included increasing focus on revenue generating
activities and continuing to strengthen the leadership at
Service Experts through its general manager development program.
This general manager development program graduated its first
class in the latter part of 2004 and its second class during the
first quarter of 2005. A third class graduated during the fourth
quarter of 2005. These general managers have assumed leadership
positions at dealer service centers.
Notable events impacting LIIs financial condition and
results of operations in 2005 include, without limitation, the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
Due to competitive cost pressures, on April 4, 2005, Lennox
Hearth Products Inc., a subsidiary of the Company, commenced
plans to relocate its Whitfield pellet stove and Lennox cast
iron stove product lines from Burlington, Washington to a third
party production facility in Juarez, Mexico, discontinue its
existing steel wood stove line manufactured in Burlington and
close the Burlington facility. These actions were substantially
complete as of December 31, 2005. In connection with the
plant closure, the Company recorded pre-tax restructuring
charges of $2.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2005, which are included in Restructuring
Charge in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of
Operations. The tax benefit of this charge was $0.8 million. |
|
|
|
On June 7, 2005, the Company completed the sale of its 45%
interest in its heat transfer joint venture to Outokumpu Copper
Products OY of Finland (Outokumpu) for $39.3 million and
the Company recorded a pre-tax gain of $9.3 million for the
year ended December 31, 2005, which is included in (Gains),
Losses and Other Expenses, Net in the accompanying Consolidated
Statements of Operations. The income tax provision on this gain
was $2.3 million. In connection with the sale, the Company
entered into an agreement with Outokumpu related to joint
remediation of certain existing environmental matters. In
conjunction with the new agreement, the Company updated its
estimate of its portion of the on-going remediation costs and
recorded pre-tax expenses of $2.2 million for the year
ended December 31, 2005. The income tax benefit of the
remediation expenses was $0.8 million. |
|
|
|
As of July 1, 2005, LII adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment
(SFAS No. 123R), using the
modified-prospective-transition method. The cumulative effect of
the change in accounting principle related to the adoption of
SFAS No. 123R was not material for the year ended
December 31, 2005. Under the standard, companies are
required to recognize compensation cost for share-based
compensation issued to or purchased by employees, net of
estimated forfeitures, under stock-based compensation plans
using a fair-value-based method effective not later than
January 1, 2006. As permitted by SFAS No. 123R,
the Company adopted the standard early. For more information,
see Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies Stock-Based Compensation in the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
On September 7, 2005, the Company called for redemption all
of its outstanding 6.25% convertible subordinated notes due
2009 (Convertible Notes) on October 7, 2005.
The redemption price was |
17
|
|
|
|
|
103.571% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid
interest to the redemption date. As of September 7, 2005,
there was $143.75 million aggregate principal amount of
Convertible Notes outstanding, which could be converted into the
Companys common stock at a rate of 55.2868 shares of
common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Convertible Notes at
anytime before the close of business on the business day prior
to the redemption date. As of October 6, 2005, the holders
of all of the Convertible Notes had converted the Convertible
Notes into an aggregate of approximately 7.9 million shares
of common stock. |
|
|
|
On September 19, 2005, LII announced its Board of Directors
had authorized a stock repurchase program, pursuant to which the
Company may repurchase up to ten million shares of its common
stock, and had terminated a prior repurchase program that was
announced November 2, 1999. Purchases under the stock
repurchase program are made on an open-market basis at
prevailing market prices. The timing of any repurchases depends
on market conditions, the market price of LIIs common
stock and managements assessment of the companys
liquidity needs and investment requirements and opportunities.
No time limit was set for completion of the program and there is
no guarantee as to the exact number of shares that will be
repurchased. As of December 31, 2005, LII had repurchased
447,400 shares of its common stock. |
|
|
|
In 2005, management successfully managed the transition to the
new National Appliance Energy Conservation Act regulation
requiring a 13 seasonal energy efficiency rating, or
SEER, standard for residential central air
conditioners. This standard, which applies to central air
conditioners manufactured after January 23, 2006, increased
by 30 percent the minimum SEER standard that applied to
models produced prior to January 23, 2006. Although this
new standard created several engineering, manufacturing and
marketing challenges for the Company, the Company successfully
met the new regulation by January 23, 2006.
Air-conditioning products with ratings lower than 13 SEER
manufactured prior to January 23, 2006 can continue to be
sold legally after such date. It is possible that quantities of
non-13 SEER compliant product may remain in the industrys
distribution pipeline after January 23, 2006 and this may
have an adverse effect on operating results during the 2006
cooling season. However, management is unable to predict the
extent to which this may occur. The Company used the new
standard as an opportunity to redesign its entire line of
cooling products to standardize product platforms across its
brands and to integrate other improvements in its products. For
the twelve months ended December 31, 2005,
expenditures for property, plant and equipment (Capital
Spending) of $63.3 million were driven in part by
expenditures in connection with this redesign effort. The
Company expects carry-over Capital Spending of approximately
$3.9 million related to this redesign effort to occur early
in 2006. |
At December 31, 2005 and 2004, LIIs projected benefit
obligation for its pension plans exceeded the fair value of the
plans assets by $69.6 million and $75.9 million,
respectively. These unfunded obligations may fluctuate due to
changes in discount rates, changes in assumptions and estimates
and changes in investment returns of plan assets. LIIs
pension expense has increased from $10.0 million for the
year ended December 31, 2004 to $11.0 million for the
year ended December 31, 2005. LII is projecting an
additional $1 million to $2 million of pension expense
in 2006 based on updated mortality tables and demographic
assumptions and discount rate and return on plan assets
assumptions of 5.75% and 8.25%, respectively.
LIIs annual pension expense is determined in accordance
with the actuarial and accounting requirements of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 87,
Employers Accounting for Pensions, and
No. 88, Employers Accounting for Settlements
and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for
Termination Benefits, and cannot be finalized until
year-end. In future years beyond 2006, LII expects pension
expense to stabilize and then decrease as contributions are
made, assuming a constant 5.75% discount rate and an 8.25%
return on plan assets.
LII expects to make required contributions to its pension plans
to maintain the funded status in future years. Due to the fluid
nature of current pension funding law, LII cannot currently
determine the amount or timing of these contributions. The cash
flow required to fund the plans in accordance with minimum
funding standards is not expected to impact LIIs ability
to operate. For the year ended December 31, 2005, LIIs
18
employer contribution to its pension plans totaled
$29.8 million, of which $25.2 million was
discretionary. LII will evaluate additional discretionary
contributions throughout 2006; however, no discretionary
contributions for 2006 are planned at this time.
LIIs fiscal year ends on December 31 and its interim
fiscal quarters are each comprised of 13 weeks. For
convenience, throughout this Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, the
13-week periods
comprising each fiscal quarter are denoted by the last day of
the calendar quarter.
Accounting for Futures Contracts
In connection with the completion of 2005 year-end
procedures related to the accounting for futures contracts for
copper and aluminum, the Company determined that these futures
contracts, previously designated as cash flow hedges, did not
qualify for hedge accounting under Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 133 Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
(SFAS No. 133), as the Companys
documentation did not meet the criteria specified by
SFAS No. 133 in order for the hedging instruments to
qualify for cash flow designation. This determination resulted
in two different types of adjustments to the Companys
consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2005.
First, the Company recorded an unrealized gain of
$23.3 million pre-tax, or $14.9 million after-tax, in
(Gains), Losses and Other Expenses, net in the accompanying
Consolidated Statements of Operations. This resulted in an
increase in net income of $6.1 million, or $0.08 per
share, in the first quarter of 2005, which included
$6.4 million of net income impact related to open futures
contracts as of December 31, 2004. Additionally, this
resulted in a decrease in net income of $3.5 million, or
$0.05 per share, in the second quarter of 2005; and an
increase in net income of $6.3 million, or $0.09 per share,
in the third quarter of 2005, by releasing amounts previously
recorded in the Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
component of Stockholders Equity. The cumulative impact to
previously reported earnings for the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2005 is an increase of $8.9 million. A
positive impact to net income of $6.0 million, or
$0.08 per share, also resulted in the fourth quarter of
2005. The Company had previously recorded this unrealized gain
in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in the accompanying
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Second, the Company realized gains of $16.7 million
pre-tax, or $10.7 million after-tax, related to settled
futures contracts, which are also recorded in (Gains), Losses
and Other Expenses, net in the accompanying Consolidated
Statements of Operations. Of these gains, $8.8 million was
previously included in Cost of Goods Sold for the nine-month
period ended September 30, 2005 and should have been
included in (Gains), Losses and Other Expenses, net in the
accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. The amounts
that had been included in Cost of Goods Sold were
$2.0 million, $2.8 million, and $4.0 million for
the first, second, and third quarters of 2005, respectively, and
had no impact on previously reported net income. For the fourth
quarter of 2005, and $8.0 million gain was recorded in
(Gains), Losses and Other Expenses, net.
19
These adjustments did not affect the Companys cash flows
and the impact on results for all periods presented prior to
2005 was not material. As a result of these adjustments, the
Companys Consolidated Statements of Operations for the
quarters ended March 31, June 30, and
September 30, 2005 and the Consolidated Balance Sheets as
of March 31, June 30, and September 30, 2005 were
restated. The following table provides the impact on previously
reported amounts within the Companys first, second and
third quarters of 2005 related to the Companys accounting
for futures contracts for copper and aluminum. Amounts are in
millions and items in parenthesis represent a decrease from the
amounts previously reported.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Increase/(Decrease) | |
Cost of goods sold
|
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
|
$ |
2.8 |
|
|
$ |
4.0 |
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
Realized gains on settled futures contracts previously included
in cost of goods sold
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on open futures contracts previously
included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
|
|
10.1 |
|
(Gains), losses and other expenses, net
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
|
14.0 |
|
Operation income from continuing operations
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
|
|
10.0 |
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and
cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
|
|
10.0 |
|
Provision for income taxes previously included in accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
3.7 |
|
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
6.3 |
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
6.3 |
|
Net income and retained earnings
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
6.3 |
|
20
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth, as a percentage of net sales,
LIIs statement of income data for the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net sales
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of good sold
|
|
|
67.1 |
|
|
|
66.6 |
|
|
|
66.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
32.9 |
|
|
|
33.4 |
|
|
|
33.8 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
26.8 |
|
|
|
27.7 |
|
|
|
28.1 |
|
(Gains) losses and other expenses, net
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Restructuring charge
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operational income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
5.6 |
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and
cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
4.7 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before cumulative
effect of accounting change
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
(4.5 |
)% |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
The following table sets forth net sales by business segment and
geographic market (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Amount | |
|
% | |
|
Amount | |
|
% | |
|
Amount | |
|
% | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Business Segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
$ |
1,685.8 |
|
|
|
50.1 |
% |
|
$ |
1,419.8 |
|
|
|
47.6 |
% |
|
$ |
1,358.7 |
|
|
|
48.7 |
% |
Commercial
|
|
|
651.7 |
|
|
|
19.3 |
|
|
|
580.8 |
|
|
|
19.5 |
|
|
|
508.4 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heating & Cooling
|
|
|
2,337.5 |
|
|
|
69.4 |
|
|
|
2,000.6 |
|
|
|
67.1 |
|
|
|
1,867.1 |
|
|
|
66.9 |
|
Service Experts
|
|
|
641.4 |
|
|
|
19.1 |
|
|
|
611.7 |
|
|
|
20.5 |
|
|
|
611.3 |
|
|
|
21.9 |
|
Refrigeration
|
|
|
467.2 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
444.7 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
387.2 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
Corporate and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
(79.9 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
(74.3 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
(75.7 |
) |
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales
|
|
$ |
3,366.2 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
2,982.7 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
2,789.9 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geographic Market:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
$ |
2,603.0 |
|
|
|
77.3 |
% |
|
$ |
2,254.8 |
|
|
|
75.6 |
% |
|
$ |
2,135.1 |
|
|
|
76.5 |
% |
International
|
|
|
763.2 |
|
|
|
22.7 |
|
|
|
727.9 |
|
|
|
24.4 |
|
|
|
654.8 |
|
|
|
23.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales
|
|
$ |
3,366.2 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
2,982.7 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
2,789.9 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2005 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2004 |
Net sales increased $383.5 million, or 12.9%, to
$3,366.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2005
from $2,982.7 million for the same period in 2004.
Excluding the favorable impact of foreign currency translation,
net sales increased $354.6 million, or 11.9%, compared to
the same period in 2004. Net sales were higher in all of the
Companys business segments for the year ended
December 31, 2005, compared to the year ended
December 31, 2004.
Net sales in the Residential Heating & Cooling business
segment increased $266.0 million, or 18.7%, to
$1,685.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2005
from $1,419.8 million for the year ended December 31,
2004. Excluding the favorable impact of foreign currency
translation, net sales increased $256.9 million, or 18.1%,
compared to the year ended December 31, 2004. All units
within the segment achieved net sales increases, led by strong
sales of HVAC equipment. LIIs Residential
Heating & Cooling businesses also benefited from
favorable weather in 2005 during the cooling season as well as
price increases in response to higher commodity prices.
According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administrations Climate Prediction Center, total
U.S. cooling degree days from January 2005 through December
2005, on a population-weighted basis, were 19% above normal and
15% above the same period in 2004. Overall, LIIs
Residential Heating & Cooling business segment
outperformed the market. According to the Air-Conditioning and
Refrigeration Institute, U.S. factory shipments of unitary
air conditioners and heat pumps were up 16% from January 2005
through December 2005, compared to the same period in 2004.
Net sales in the Commercial Heating & Cooling business
segment increased $70.9 million, or 12.2%, to
$651.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2005,
compared to the year ended December 31, 2004. After
excluding the favorable impact of foreign currency translation,
net sales increased $67.0 million, or 11.5%, compared to
the year ended December 31, 2004. The increase in net sales
was due primarily to strong domestic sales growth, particularly
in sales to national accounts and to commercial mechanical
contractors, and to price increases in response to higher
commodity prices. After excluding the impact of foreign currency
translation, net sales in the Companys European operations
for the year ended December 31, 2005 were slightly higher
compared to the same period in 2004.
22
Net sales in the Service Experts business segment increased
$29.7 million, or 4.9%, to $641.4 million for the year
ended December 31, 2005 from $611.7 million for the
year ended December 31, 2004. Net sales increased
$22.0 million, or 3.6%, after excluding the favorable
impact of foreign currency translation. The increase in net
sales was due primarily to favorable weather during the cooling
season.
Refrigeration business segment net sales increased
$22.5 million, or 5.1%, to $467.2 million for the year
ended December 31, 2005 compared to $444.7 million for
the year ended December 31, 2004. After excluding the
impact of foreign currency translation, net sales increased
$12.8 million, or 2.9%, for the year ended
December 31, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004.
North and South America had higher net sales due primarily to
growth in original equipment manufacturer sales that service the
supermarket, walk-in refrigeration and cold storage market
segments, as well as price increases in response to higher
commodity prices. After excluding the impact of foreign currency
translation, net sales were lower in the Companys Asia
Pacific operations and flat in the Companys European
operations.
Gross profit was $1,108.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2005, compared to $997.5 million for the
year ended December 31, 2004, an increase of
$110.5 million. Gross profit margin declined to 32.9% for
the year ended December 31, 2005 from 33.4% in the same
period in 2004. The decline was due to the realization of
$16.7 million of gains related to settled futures contracts
included in (gains), losses and other expenses, net rather than
cost of goods sold. See Accounting for Futures
Contracts above. If the Company had included these
realized gains of $16.7 million in cost of goods sold,
gross profit would have been $1,124.7 million and gross
profit margin would have been 33.4% for the year ended
December 31, 2005.
Higher costs were incurred by LIIs manufacturing
businesses as prices for commodities and related components
increased by approximately $67 million for the year ended
December 31, 2005, compared to the same period in 2004. LII
was able to offset higher commodity prices through price
increases. Last in, first out (LIFO) inventory
liquidations did not have a material impact on gross profit
margins for all periods presented. The Companys gross
profit margin may not be comparable to the gross profit margin
of other entities because some entities include all of the costs
related to their distribution network in cost of goods sold,
whereas the Company excludes a portion of such costs from gross
profit margin, including such costs in the Selling, General and
Administrative Expense (SG&A) line item instead.
For more information, see Note 2 Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies Shipping and
Handling in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
|
Selling, General and Administrative Expense |
SG&A expenses were $902.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2005, an increase of $76.3 million, or
9.2%, from $826.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004. The $76.3 million increase in
SG&A expenses was due primarily to higher distribution,
selling and marketing expenses of $56.4 million driven by
higher sales volumes, unfavorable foreign currency translation
(part of which is included in the higher distribution, selling
and marketing expenses), higher expenses for short-term and
long-term incentive compensation programs due to improved LII
financial performance coupled with a higher LII common stock
price and expenses associated with personnel changes. As a
percentage of total net sales, SG&A expenses declined to
26.8% for the year ended December 31, 2005 from 27.7% for
the year ended December 31, 2004. The Company has no
significant concentration of credit risk among its diversified
customer base.
23
|
|
|
(Gains), Losses and Other Expenses, Net |
(Gains), losses and other expenses, net were
$(50.2) million for the year ended December 31, 2005
and zero for the year ended December 31, 2004. For the year
ended December 31, 2005, (gains), losses and other
expenses, net included the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Pre-tax | |
|
Tax (Benefit) | |
|
After-tax | |
|
|
(Gain) Loss | |
|
Provision | |
|
(Gain) Loss | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Realized gains on settled futures contracts
|
|
$ |
(16.7 |
) |
|
$ |
6.0 |
|
|
$ |
(10.7 |
) |
Unrealized gains on open futures contracts
|
|
|
(23.3 |
) |
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
(14.9 |
) |
Gain on sale of LIIs 45% interest in its heat transfer
joint venture to Outokumpu
|
|
|
(9.3 |
) |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
(7.0 |
) |
Estimated on-going remediation costs in conjunction with the
joint remediation agreement LII entered into with Outokumpu
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
1.4 |
|
Other items, net
|
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gains), losses and other expenses, net
|
|
$ |
(50.2 |
) |
|
$ |
16.1 |
|
|
$ |
(34.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to competitive cost pressures, on April 4, 2005, Lennox
Hearth Products Inc., a subsidiary of the Company, commenced
plans to relocate its Whitfield pellet stove and Lennox cast
iron stove product lines from Burlington, Washington to a third
party production facility in Juarez, Mexico, discontinue its
existing steel wood stove line manufactured in Burlington and
close the Burlington facility. These actions were substantially
complete as of December 31, 2005. In connection with the
plant closure, the Company recorded a pre-tax restructuring
charge of $2.4 million for the year ended December 31,
2005. The tax benefit of this charge was $0.8 million.
Goodwill impairment represents a pre-tax, non-cash, charge of
$208.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 in
the Companys Service Experts business segment, where lower
than expected operating results occurred. The tax benefit of
this charge was $23.2 million. During the first quarter of
2004, the Company conducted fair-value-based tests, which are
required at least annually by SFAS No. 142, and
determined that the carrying value of Service Experts
goodwill exceeded its fair value. These fair-value-based tests
were applied to all Service Experts service centers before
consideration of the divestitures previously announced as part
of the Companys Service Experts turnaround plan. An
additional $14.8 million of pre-tax goodwill impairment is
included in the $38.9 million pre-tax Loss from Operations
of Discontinued Operations discussed below resulting in a total
pre-tax goodwill impairment charge of $222.8 million for
the year ended December 31, 2004. During the first quarter
of 2005, LII performed its annual goodwill impairment test and
determined that no further goodwill impairment was necessary.
Interest expense, net, decreased $11.8 million from
$27.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 to
$15.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2005.
The lower interest expense was due primarily to lower average
debt levels, the absence of $1.9 million of make-whole
expenses for the year ended December 31, 2004 related to
the Companys $35 million pre-payment of certain
long-term debt in June 2004 and interest income earned on higher
average cash and cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2005,
total debt of $120.5 million was $190.0 million lower
than total debt as of December 31, 2004. As discussed
previously, as of October 6, 2005, the holders of the
Convertible Notes had converted all of the $143.75 million
aggregate principal amount of Convertible Notes into an
aggregate of approximately 7.9 million shares of common
stock.
24
As of December 31, 2005, cash and cash equivalents of
$213.5 million was $152.6 million higher than cash and
cash equivalents as of December 31, 2004.
Other (income) expense was $3.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2005, compared to ($0.8) million for the
same period in 2004. The increase in other expense was due
primarily to foreign currency exchange losses, which relate
principally to the Companys operations in Canada,
Australia and Europe.
|
|
|
Provision for Income Taxes |
The provision for income taxes on continuing operations was
$83.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2005
compared to a provision for income taxes on continuing
operations of $30.5 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004. The effective tax rate on continuing
operations was 35.3% and (48.4)% for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.
Excluding the impact of goodwill impairment, the provision for
income taxes on continuing operations would have been
$53.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 and
the effective tax rate on continuing operations would have been
37.0% for the year ended December 31, 2004. These effective
rates differ from the statutory federal rate of 35% principally
due to state and local taxes, non-deductible expenses, foreign
operating losses for which no tax benefits have been recognized
and foreign taxes at rates other than 35%.
On June 30, 2005, Ohio enacted legislation changing its tax
system. As a result of this legislation and in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes, a provision for income
taxes of $1.6 million was recorded for the year ended
December 31, 2005.
The American Jobs Creation Act (AJCA) was signed
into law on October 22, 2004. The AJCA provided an
opportunity to repatriate foreign earnings and claim an 85%
dividend received deduction against the repatriated amount. The
Company evaluated the potential effects of repatriation and
determined not to repatriate earnings under this provision.
|
|
|
Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change, Net |
As discussed previously, effective July 1, 2005, the
Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of
SFAS No. 123R using the
modified-prospective-transition method. The cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle related to the adoption of
SFAS No. 123R was not material for the year ended
December 31, 2005.
In March 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 47,
Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement
Obligations An Interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 143 (FIN No. 47), which
was effective for the Company as of December 31, 2005. This
interpretation provides additional guidance as to when companies
should record the fair value of a liability for a conditional
asset retirement obligation when there is uncertainty about the
timing or method of settlement of the obligation. The cumulative
effect of the change in accounting related to the adoption of
FIN No. 47 was not material for the year ended
December 31, 2005.
The cumulative effect of change in accounting related to the
adoption of SFAS No. 123R and FIN No. 47 was after-tax
income of $0.1 million for the year ended December 31,
2005.
|
|
|
Loss from Discontinued Operations |
In the first fiscal quarter of 2004, the Companys Board of
Directors approved a turnaround plan designed to improve the
performance of its Service Experts business segment. The plan
realigned Service Experts dealer service centers to focus
on service and replacement opportunities in the residential and
light commercial markets. LII identified approximately
130 centers, whose primary business is residential and
light commercial service and replacement, to comprise the
ongoing Service Experts business segment. As of
December 31, 2004, the Company had divested the remaining
48 centers.
25
Under SFAS No. 144, the operating results of the
48 centers that are no longer a part of the Service Experts
business segment for all periods presented are reported as
Discontinued Operations in LIIs Consolidated Statements of
Operations. The following table details the Companys
pre-tax loss from discontinued operations for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004, as well as the cumulative
pre-tax loss incurred through December 31, 2005 (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incurred | |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
through | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Goodwill impairment
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14.8 |
|
|
$ |
14.8 |
|
Impairment of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
Other divestiture costs
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
38.9 |
|
|
|
40.9 |
|
Loss on disposal of centers
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loss from discontinued operations before income tax
|
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
|
$ |
53.8 |
|
|
$ |
55.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The pre-tax loss of $2.0 million from discontinued
operations for the year ended December 31, 2005 was
primarily related to salary, severance, legal and other related
expenses. Any future additional expenses are not expected to be
material. The income tax benefit on discontinued operations was
$0.7 million and $12.9 million for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The income tax
benefit on discontinued operations for the year ended
December 31, 2004 of $12.9 million includes a
$1.6 million tax benefit related to goodwill impairment.
Through December 31, 2005, cumulative proceeds from the
sale of the 48 centers totaled $25.8 million.
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2003 |
Net sales increased $192.8 million, or 6.9%, to
$2,982.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2004
from $2,789.9 million for the same period in 2003.
Excluding the favorable impact of foreign currency translation,
net sales increased $130.7 million, or 4.7%, compared to
the same period in 2003. Excluding the favorable impact of
foreign currency translation, net sales were higher in all of
the Companys business segments, with the exception of
Service Experts.
Net sales in the Residential Heating & Cooling business
segment increased $61.1 million, or 4.5%, to
$1,419.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2004
from $1,358.7 million for the year ended December 31,
2003. Excluding the impact of foreign currency translation, net
sales increased 3.6%, or $48.4 million, compared to the
year ended December 31, 2003. Net sales increases were
achieved by all of the Companys major home comfort
businesses in the Residential Heating & Cooling
business segment due in part to sustained strength in
residential new construction and price increases in response to
rising commodity prices, although cooler than normal summer
weather negatively impacted net sales. According to the National
Association of Home Builders, single-family housing starts of
1.61 million units in 2004 were 7.5% higher than in 2003.
Net sales of premium Dave Lennox Signature collection home
comfort products were up 25% for the year ended
December 31, 2004 compared to the same period in 2003. Net
sales in the Companys Hearth Products business segment
were up significantly over the same period as a result of
increased sales to existing customers.
Net sales in the Commercial Heating & Cooling business
segment increased $72.4 million, or 14.2%, to
$580.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2004
compared to the year ended December 31, 2003. Excluding the
impact of foreign currency translation, net sales increased
$56.3 million, or 11.1%, compared to the year ended
December 31, 2003. The increase in net sales was due
primarily to strong domestic sales
26
growth, particularly in sales to national accounts, as well as
an increase in sales to commercial mechanical contractors. When
adjusted for foreign currency translation, net sales in the
Companys European operations for the year ended
December 31, 2004 were also higher compared to the same
period in 2003.
Net sales in the Service Experts business segment were flat at
$611.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2004
compared to $611.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003. After excluding the favorable impact of
foreign currency translation, net sales declined
$7.3 million, or 1.2%. The flat net sales were due in part
to cooler than normal summer weather.
Refrigeration business segment net sales increased
$57.5 million, or 14.9%, to $444.7 million for the
year ended December 31, 2004 compared to the year ended
December 31, 2003. Excluding the impact of foreign currency
translation, net sales increased $30.4 million, or 7.9%,
for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to the same
period in 2003. Net sales were higher in all businesses within
this segment after excluding the favorable impact of foreign
currency translation and were particularly strong domestically.
Domestic sales were up significantly for the year ended
December 31, 2004 compared to the same period in 2003 due
in large part to strong activity in large cold storage projects
and improved market penetration in the supermarket sector. Net
sales were higher in the Companys Asia Pacific operations
as a result of improved demand for refrigeration equipment,
particularly in the supermarket sector. Net sales were also
higher in the Companys European operations.
Gross profit was $997.5 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004 compared to $943.3 million for the
year ended December 31, 2003, an increase of
$54.2 million, or 5.7%. Gross profit margin declined to
33.4% from 33.8% for the year ended December 31, 2004
compared to the same period in 2003. The decline in gross profit
margin was due primarily to declines in the Companys
Residential Heating & Cooling and Service Experts
business segments as well as higher commodity prices overall.
Although commodity prices, and related component costs, in
LIIs manufacturing businesses increased by approximately
$47 million for the year ended December 31, 2004
compared to the same period in 2003, LII partially mitigated the
impact of rising commodity prices in 2004 through a combination
of improved production efficiency, cost reduction initiatives,
hedging programs and price increases.
In the Companys Residential Heating & Cooling
business segment, gross profit margins declined 0.4% for the
year ended December 31, 2004 compared to the same period in
2003 due primarily to rising commodity prices partially offset
by higher volumes, a favorable mix of higher-margin premium
products and improved factory performance. Gross profit margins
improved 0.1% in the Companys Commercial
Heating & Cooling business segment over the same period
due to higher volumes and strong factory performance partially
offset by rising commodity prices. In the Companys Service
Experts business segment, gross profit margin declined 0.2% over
the same period due in part to unfavorable weather skewing the
revenue mix towards lower-margin maintenance business versus
higher-margin replacement business. In the Companys
Refrigeration business segment, gross profit margin was flat
over the same period.
LIFO inventory liquidations did not have a material impact on
gross profit margins for all periods presented. The
Companys gross profit margin may not be comparable to the
gross profit margin of other entities because some entities
include all of the costs related to their distribution network
in cost of goods sold, whereas the Company excludes a portion of
such costs from gross profit margin, including such costs in the
SG&A line item instead. For more information, see
Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies Shipping and Handling in the Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
|
Selling, General and Administrative Expense |
SG&A expenses were $826.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004, an increase of $42.5 million, or
5.4%, from $783.6 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003. Of the $42.5 million increase in
SG&A expenses, approximately $16 million was due to
unfavorable foreign currency translation, $11 million due
to consulting fees in connection with Sarbanes-Oxley compliance,
$7 million due to investigation costs related to the
Service Experts operations and $1.6 million for a prior
period adjustment relating to a Canadian currency
27
translation account in 2003. Higher freight and commissions due
primarily to higher sales volumes, higher distribution and
selling expenses and cost increases in overhead expenses
accounted for the remaining portion of the increase in SG&A.
As a percentage of total net sales, SG&A expenses improved
to 27.7% for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to
28.1% for the year ended December 31, 2003. The Company has
no significant concentration of credit risk among its
diversified customer base.
Goodwill impairment represents a pre-tax, non-cash charge of
$208.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 in
the Companys Service Experts business segment, where lower
than expected operating results occurred. The tax benefit of
this charge was $23.2 million. During the first quarter of
2004, the Company conducted fair-value-based tests, which are
required at least annually by SFAS No. 142, and
determined that the carrying value of Service Experts
goodwill exceeded its fair value. These fair-value-based tests
were applied to all Service Experts service centers before
consideration of the divestitures announced as part of the
Companys Service Experts turnaround plan. An additional
$14.8 million of pre-tax goodwill impairment is included in
the $38.9 million pre-tax loss from operations of
discontinued operations discussed below resulting in a total
pre-tax goodwill impairment charge of $222.8 million for
the year ended December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
(Gain), Losses and Other Expenses, Net |
(Gains), losses and other expenses, net were a pre-tax expense
of $1.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2003
which included a pre-tax expense of $3.4 million for
reserve requirements related to the Companys heat transfer
joint venture agreement the Company entered into with Outokumpu
during the third quarter of 2002, pre-tax expenses totaling
$2.6 million from the loss on the sale of a HVAC
distributor in the Companys Residential Heating &
Cooling business segment and other expenses partially offset by
a $2.4 million pre-tax gain on the sale of the
Companys Electrical Products Division and a
$1.7 million pre-tax gain on the sale of a manufacturing
facility in Europe in the Companys Refrigeration business
segment.
Interest expense, net for the year ended December 31, 2004
decreased $1.2 million from $28.4 million for the year
ended December 31, 2003. The lower interest expense was due
primarily to lower average debt levels partially offset by
$1.9 million of expenses related to the Companys
$35 million pre-payment of certain long-term debt in June
2004. The $35 million long-term debt pre-payment was
scheduled to be repaid in the third quarter of 2005. As of
December 31, 2004, total debt of $310.5 million was
$51.8 million lower than total debt as of December 31,
2003.
Other (income) expense was ($0.8) million for the year
ended December 31, 2004 and ($2.4) million in 2003.
Other (income) expense includes foreign currency exchange gains,
which relate principally to the Companys operations in
Canada, Australia and Europe, and expenses related to minority
interest holders.
|
|
|
Provision for Income Taxes |
The provision for income taxes on continuing operations was
$30.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2004
compared to a provision for income taxes on continuing
operations of $45.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003. The effective tax rate on continuing
operations was (48.4%) and 34.2% for the year ended
December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively.
Excluding the impact of goodwill impairment, the provision for
income taxes on continuing operations would have been
$53.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 and
the effective tax rate on continuing operations would have been
37.0% for the year ended December 31, 2004. These effective
rates differ from the statutory federal rate of 35% principally
due to state and local taxes, non-deductible expenses, foreign
operating losses for which no tax benefits have been recognized
and foreign taxes at rates other than 35%.
28
|
|
|
Loss from Discontinued Operations |
In the first fiscal quarter of 2004, the Companys Board of
Directors approved a turnaround plan designed to improve the
performance of its Service Experts business segment. The plan
realigned Service Experts dealer service centers to focus
on service and replacement opportunities in the residential and
light commercial markets. LII identified approximately 130
dealer service centers, whose primary business is residential
and light commercial service and replacement, to comprise the
ongoing Service Experts business segment. As of
December 31, 2004, the Company had divested the remaining
48 centers.
Under SFAS No. 144, the operating results of the 48
centers that are no longer a part of the Service Experts
business segment for all periods presented are reported as
Discontinued Operations in LIIs Consolidated Statements of
Operations. The following table details the Companys
pre-tax loss from discontinued operations for the year ended
December 31, 2004 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
Goodwill impairment
|
|
$ |
14.8 |
|
Impairment of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
Other divestiture costs
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
38.9 |
|
Loss on disposal of centers
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loss from discontinued operations before income tax
|
|
$ |
53.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
No specific reserves were created as a result of the turnaround
plan. The income tax benefit on discontinued operations was
$12.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2004,
which includes a $1.6 million income tax benefit related to
the goodwill impairment. Through December 31, 2004,
proceeds from the sale of the 48 centers totaled
$23.3 million.
Liquidity, Capital Resources and Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangements
LIIs working capital and capital expenditure requirements
are generally met through net cash provided by operations, bank
lines of credit and a revolving period asset securitization
arrangement. Working capital needs are more extensive in the
first and second quarter due to the seasonal nature of the
Companys business cycle.
As of December 31, 2005, the Companys
debt-to-total-capital
ratio was 13%, down from 40% as of December 31, 2004
primarily due to the redemption of the Convertible Notes and the
repayment of debt.
During 2005, cash provided by operations was
$228.7 million, compared to $57.4 million in 2004 and
$56.7 million in 2003, respectively. If the effects of the
Companys asset securitization program were excluded, the
comparison would have been $228.7 million cash provided by
operations in 2005 compared to $57.4 million cash provided
by operations in 2004 and $(42.3) million cash used in
operations in 2003. The increase in cash from operations in 2005
is a reflection of higher earnings and process improvements
related to working capital in 2005 as compared to 2004.
Net cash used in investing activities was $20.8 million in
2005 compared to $17.9 million and $22.4 million in
2004 and 2003, respectively. Net cash used in investing
activities in 2005 includes $39.3 million of proceeds from
the sale of the Companys 45% interest in its heat transfer
joint venture to Outokumpu Copper Products OY of Finland. Net
cash used in investing activities in 2004 includes
$21.8 million of proceeds from the sale of discontinued
service centers of the Companys Service Experts segment.
Net cash used in financing activities was $56.9 million in
2005 compared to $55.1 million and $31.9 million in
2004 and 2003, respectively. The Company paid a total of
$24.8 million in dividends on its
29
common stock in 2005 as compared to $22.8 million and
$22.1 million in 2004 and 2003, respectively. Net
repayments of long-term debt, short-term borrowings and
revolving long-term borrowings totaled approximately
$45.5 million in 2005 as compared to $52.3 million and
$19.2 million in 2004 and 2003, respectively.
As of December 31, 2005, $23.1 million of cash and
cash equivalents were restricted primarily due to routine check
clearing float on customer payments received in lockbox
collections and letters of credit issued with respect to the
operations of its captive insurance subsidiary, which expire on
December 30, 2006. These letter of credit restrictions can
be transferred to the Companys revolving lines of credit,
as needed.
Capital expenditures of $63.3 million, $40.3 million
and $39.7 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively,
resulted primarily from purchases of production equipment in the
manufacturing plants in the Residential Heating &
Cooling and Commercial Heating & Cooling business
segments. The Company projects its capital expenditures to
increase in 2006 to approximately $70 million primarily due
to factory expansion to accommodate continued domestic
Commercial Heating & Cooling growth and IT investments
for CRM software and the implementation of SAP in Europe.
As of December 31, 2005, the Company had approximately
$27.1 million in unfunded post retirement benefit
obligations that relate to the Companys medical and life
insurance benefits to eligible employees. The Company does not
intend to pre-fund these obligations at this time. Benefits
provided under these plans have been and will continue to be
paid as they arise. Employer contributions were
$2.4 million, $2.1 million and $2.6 million in
2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Based on current information,
the Company does not expect a significant change in 2006 and
future years. The Company does not expect the cash flow required
to pay the benefits under these plans to impact the
Companys ability to operate.
In June 2004, LII made a pre-payment on its long-term debt of
$35 million, which was scheduled to mature in the third
quarter of 2005. The pre-payment make-whole amount associated
with the debt was $1.9 million and was expensed in 2004.
As of December 31, 2005, the Company had outstanding
long-term debt obligations totaling $119.3 million, which
was down from $304.5 million and $358.7 million at
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The amount
outstanding as of December 31, 2005 consisted primarily of
three issuances of notes with an aggregate principal outstanding
of $118.3 million, with interest rates ranging from 6.73%
to 8.0% and maturities ranging from 2006 to 2010.
The Company has bank lines of credit aggregating
$427.5 million, of which $1.2 million was borrowed and
outstanding and $90.7 million was committed to standby
letters of credit at December 31, 2005. Of the remaining
$335.6 million, the entire amount was available for future
borrowings after consideration of covenant limitations. Included
in the lines of credit are several regional facilities and a
multi-currency facility governed by agreements between the
Company and a syndicate of banks. In July 2005, the Company
amended and restated its revolving credit facility to, among
other things, increase the borrowing capacity from
$225 million to $400 million and extend the maturity
date from September 2006 to July 2010. The facility contains
certain financial covenants and bears interest at a rate equal
to, at the Companys option, either (a) the greater of
the banks prime rate or the federal funds rate plus 0.5%,
or (b) the London Interbank Offered Rate plus a margin
equal to 0.475% to 1.20%, depending upon the ratio of total
funded debt-to-adjusted
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
(Adjusted EBITDA), as defined in the facility. The
Company pays a facility fee, depending upon the ratio of total
funded debt to Adjusted EBITDA, equal to 0.15% to 0.30% of the
capacity. The facility includes restrictive covenants that limit
the Companys ability to incur additional indebtedness,
encumber its assets, sell its assets and make certain payments,
including amounts for share repurchases and dividends. The
Companys facility and promissory notes are secured by the
stock of the Companys major subsidiaries. The facility
requires that LII annually and quarterly deliver financial
statements, as well as compliance certificates, to the banks
within specified time periods.
On September 7, 2005, the Company called for redemption all
of its outstanding 6.25% convertible subordinated notes
(Convertible Notes) on October 7, 2005. The
redemption price was 103.571% of the principal amount. As of
September 7, 2005, there was $143.75 million aggregate
principal amount of
30
Convertible Notes outstanding, which could be converted into the
Companys common stock at a rate of 55.2868 shares of
common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Convertible
Notes at any time before the close of business on the business
day prior to the redemption date. As of October 6, 2005,
the holders of all of the Convertible Notes had converted the
Convertible Notes into an aggregate of approximately
7.9 million shares of common stock.
On September 19, 2005, LII announced its Board of Directors
had authorized a stock repurchase program, pursuant to which the
Company may repurchase up to ten million shares of its common
stock, and had terminated a prior repurchase program that was
announced November 2, 1999. Purchases under the stock
repurchase program are made on an open-market basis at
prevailing market prices. The timing of any repurchases depends
on market conditions, the market price of LIIs common
stock and managements assessment of the Companys
liquidity needs and investment requirements and opportunities.
No time limit was set for completion of the program and there is
no guarantee as to the exact number of shares that will be
repurchased. As of December 31, 2005, the Company had
repurchased 447,400 shares of common stock at an average
price of $28.65 per share under the stock repurchase
program.
In addition to the revolving and term loans described above, LII
utilizes the following financing arrangements in the course of
funding its operations:
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable are sold on a non-recourse basis to
third parties. The sales are reported as a reduction of the
asset Accounts and Notes Receivable, Net in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 2005 and
December 31, 2004, respectively, LII had not sold any of
such accounts receivable. The receivables are sold at a discount
from face value, and this discount aggregated $0.9 million,
$2.3 million and $2.9 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003,
respectively. The discount expense is shown as a component of
Selling, General and Administrative Expense in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations. |
|
|
|
LII also leases real estate and machinery and equipment pursuant
to leases that, in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (GAAP), are not capitalized on the
balance sheet, including high-turnover equipment such as autos
and service vehicles and short-lived equipment such as personal
computers. These operating leases generated rent expense of
approximately $52.9 million, $55.3 million and
$55.9 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. |
LIIs domestic revolving and term loans contain certain
financial covenant restrictions. As of December 31, 2005,
LII was in compliance with all covenant requirements. LII
periodically reviews its capital structure, including its
primary bank facility, to ensure that it has adequate liquidity.
LII believes that cash flow from operations, as well as
available borrowings under its revolving credit facility and
other sources of funding, will be sufficient to fund its
operations for the foreseeable future.
Contractual Obligations
Summarized below are LIIs long-term payment obligations as
of December 31, 2005 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
1 Year | |
|
2-3 | |
|
4-5 | |
|
After | |
|
|
Total | |
|
or Less | |
|
Years | |
|
Years | |
|
5 Years | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Long-term debt and capital leases
|
|
$ |
119.3 |
|
|
$ |
11.3 |
|
|
$ |
72.6 |
|
|
$ |
35.3 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
183.8 |
|
|
|
44.4 |
|
|
|
57.1 |
|
|
|
29.0 |
|
|
|
53.3 |
|
Purchase obligations
|
|
|
64.7 |
|
|
|
63.0 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated interest payments on long-term debt and capital leases
|
|
|
27.3 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations
|
|
$ |
395.1 |
|
|
$ |
128.0 |
|
|
$ |
144.5 |
|
|
$ |
68.9 |
|
|
$ |
53.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase obligations consist of copper and aluminum commitments.
The above table does not include retirement, postretirement and
warranty liabilities because it is not certain when these
liabilities will become
31
due. See Notes 2 and 11 of the Notes to the Companys
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Market Risk
LIIs results of operations can be affected by changes in
exchange rates. Net sales and expenses in foreign currencies are
translated into United States dollars for financial reporting
purposes based on the average exchange rate for the period.
During 2005, 2004 and 2003, net sales from outside the United
States represented 22.7%, 24.4% and 23.5%, respectively, of
total net sales. Historically, foreign currency transaction
gains (losses) have not had a material effect on LIIs
overall operations. The impact of a 10% change in exchange rates
on income from operations is estimated to be approximately
$4.0 million.
The Companys results of operations can be affected by
changes in interest rates due to variable rates of interest on
the revolving credit facilities. A 10% change in interest rates
would not be material to the Companys results of
operations.
The Company enters into commodity futures contracts to stabilize
prices expected to be paid for raw materials and parts
containing high copper and aluminum content. These contracts are
for quantities equal to, or less than, quantities expected to be
consumed in future production. As of December 31, 2005, LII
had committed to purchase 45.9 million pounds of
aluminum and 33.6 million pounds of copper under such
arrangements through December 2007. As of December 31,
2005, the net fair value of these futures contracts was
$24.0 million. In 2005, the Company determined that these
futures contracts did not qualify for hedge accounting under
SFAS No. 133 as the Companys documentation did not
meet the criteria specified by SFAS No. 133 in order
for the hedging instruments to qualify for cash flow
designation. Accordingly, the Company recorded an unrealized
gain of $23.3 million for the year ended December 31,
2005 in (Gains), Losses and Other Expenses, net in the
accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations for 2005
related to these open forward purchase contracts. The impact of
a 10% change in commodity prices on the Companys results
from operations is estimated to be approximately
$31.0 million, absent any other contravening actions.
In the first quarter of 2006, the Company engaged an outside
consultant to assist it in redesigning its policies, procedures
and controls with respect to its commodity hedging activities
and the Company will not initiate any additional hedging
contracts until this process is completed.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements requires the use of
judgments and estimates. The critical accounting policies are
described below to provide a better understanding of how the
Company develops its judgments about future events and related
estimations and how such policies can impact the financial
statements. A critical accounting policy is one that requires
its most difficult, subjective or complex estimates and
assessments and is fundamental to the results of operations. The
Company identified the most critical accounting policies to be:
|
|
|
|
|
Estimation of warranty liabilities; |
|
|
|
Valuation of goodwill and intangible assets; |
|
|
|
Adequacy of allowance for doubtful accounts; |
|
|
|
Pension and postretirement benefit projections; |
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation; |
|
|
|
Estimates of self-insured risks; and |
|
|
|
Income taxes. |
This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with
the consolidated financial statements and related notes in
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data.
32
A liability for estimated warranty expense is established by a
charge against operations at the time the Company recognizes
revenue. The subsequent costs incurred for warranty claims serve
to reduce the accrued product warranty liability. The Company
recorded warranty expense of $36.3 million,
$28.2 million and $24.1 million for the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
The Companys estimate of future warranty costs is
determined for each product line. The number of units that are
expected to be repaired or replaced is determined by applying
the estimated failure rate, which is generally based on
historical experience, to the number of units that have been
sold and are still under warranty. The estimated units to be
repaired under warranty are multiplied by the average cost
(undiscounted) to repair or replace such products to
determine the Companys estimated future warranty cost. The
Company also provides for specifically identified warranty
obligations. The Companys estimated future warranty cost
is subject to adjustment from time to time depending on changes
in actual failure rate and cost experience. Should actual claim
rates differ from the Companys estimates, revisions to the
estimated product warranty liability would be required.
|
|
|
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets |
Goodwill and intangible assets acquired in a purchase business
combination and determined to have an indefinite useful life are
not amortized, but instead tested for impairment at least
annually by reporting unit in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 142. SFAS No. 142 also requires
that intangible assets with estimable useful lives be amortized
over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated
residual values, and reviewed for impairment in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144,
Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets.
The Company estimates reporting unit fair values using standard
business valuation techniques such as discounted cash flows and
reference to comparable business transactions. The discounted
cash flows fair value estimates are based on managements
projected future cash flows and the estimated weighted average
cost of capital. The estimated weighted average cost of capital
is based on the risk-free interest rate and other factors such
as equity risk premiums and the ratio of total debt and equity
capital.
In addition, the Company periodically reviews intangible assets
with estimable useful lives for impairment as events or changes
in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such
assets might not be recoverable. In order to assess
recoverability, the Company compares the estimated expected
future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges)
identified with each long-lived asset or related asset grouping
to the carrying amount of such assets. For purposes of such
comparisons, portions of goodwill are attributed to related
long-lived assets and identifiable intangible assets based upon
relative fair values of such assets at acquisition. If the
expected future cash flows do not exceed the carrying value of
the asset or assets being reviewed, an impairment loss is
recognized based on the excess of the carrying amount of the
impaired assets over their fair value.
The Company must make assumptions regarding estimated future
cash flows and other factors to determine the fair value of the
respective assets in assessing the fair value of its goodwill
and other intangibles. If these estimates or the related
assumptions change, the Company may be required to record
impairment charges for these assets in the future.
|
|
|
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts |
The allowance for doubtful accounts is generally established
during the period in which receivables are recognized and is
maintained at a level deemed appropriate by management based on
historical and other factors that affect collectibility. Such
factors include the historical trends of write-offs and recovery
of previously written-off accounts, the financial strength of
the customer and projected economic and market conditions. The
evaluation of these factors involves complex, subjective
judgments. Thus, changes in these factors or changes in economic
circumstances may significantly impact the consolidated
financial statements.
33
|
|
|
Pensions and Postretirement Benefits |
The Company has domestic and foreign pension plans covering
essentially all employees. The Company also maintains an
unfunded postretirement benefit plan, which provides certain
medical and life insurance benefits to eligible employees. The
pension plans are accounted for under provisions of
SFAS No. 87, Employers Accounting for
Pensions. The postretirement benefit plan is accounted for
under the provisions of SFAS No. 106,
Employers Accounting for Postretirement Benefits
Other than Pensions (FAS 106).
The benefit plan assets and liabilities included in the
Companys financial statements and associated notes reflect
managements assessment as to the long-range performance of
its benefit plans. These assumptions are listed below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits | |
|
Other Benefits | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Weighted-average assumptions as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.75 |
% |
|
|
5.75 |
% |
|
|
5.75 |
% |
|
|
5.75 |
% |
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
8.25 |
|
|
|
8.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To develop the expected long-term rate of return on assets
assumption, the Company considered the historical returns and
the future expectations for returns for each asset class, as
well as the target asset allocation of the pension portfolio and
the effect of periodic rebalancing. These results were adjusted
for the payment of reasonable expenses of the plan from plan
assets. This resulted in the selection of the 8.25% long-term
rate of return on assets assumption. Should actual results
differ from the Companys estimates, revisions to the
benefit plan assets and liabilities would be required.
To select a discount rate for the purpose of valuing the plan
obligations, the Company performed an analysis in which the
duration of projected cash flows from defined benefit and
retiree health care plans were matched with a yield curve based
on the appropriate universe of high-quality corporate bonds that
were available. The Company used the results of the yield curve
analysis to select the discount rate that matched the duration
and payment stream of the benefits in each plan. The rate was
rounded to the nearest quarter of a percent. This resulted in
the selection of the 5.75% discount rate assumption. Should
actual results differ from the Companys estimates,
revisions to the benefit plan liabilities would be required.
With the implementation of SFAS No. 123R on
July 1, 2005, stock-based compensation changes our
financial statements as detailed in Notes 2 and 12 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements. Determining the amount of
expense for stock-based compensation, as well as the associated
impact to the balance sheets and statements of cash flows,
requires the Company to develop estimates of the fair value of
stock-based compensation expense. The most significant factors
of that expense that require estimates or projections include
the expected volatility, expected lives and estimated forfeiture
rates of stock-based awards.
For grants made prior to July 1, 2005, an analysis of
historical volatility was used to develop the estimate of
expected volatility. Effective July 1, 2005, the Company
changed its method of determining expected volatility on all
stock option and stock appreciation rights granted after that
date to a combination of historical volatility and available
market implied volatility rates. After giving consideration to
recently available regulatory guidance, the Company believes
that a combination of historical volatility and market-based
measures of implied volatility are currently the best available
indicators of expected volatility of the Companys stock
price.
The expected lives of stock options and stock appreciation
rights are determined based on historical exercise experience,
using a rolling 7-year
average and estimated forfeiture rates are derived from
historical forfeiture patterns. The Company believes the
historical experience method is the best estimate of future
exercise patterns and forfeitures currently available.
34
The Company uses a combination of third party insurance and
self-insurance plans (large deductible or captive) to provide
protection against claims relating to workers
compensation, general liability, product liability, property
damage, aviation liability, directors and officers
liability, auto liability, physical damage and other exposures.
LII maintains third party coverage for risks not retained within
the Companys large deductible or captive insurance plans.
The Company utilizes the services of a third party actuary to
assist in the determination of its self-insurance and captive
expense and liabilities. The expense and liabilities are
determined based on historical company claims information, as
well as industry factors and trends in the level of such claims
and payments.
As of December 31, 2005, the Companys self-insurance
and captive reserves, calculated on an undiscounted basis,
represent the best estimate of the future payments to be made on
losses reported and unreported for 2005 and prior years. The
majority of the Companys self-insured risks (excluding
auto liability and physical damage) have relatively long payout
patterns. Pursuant to the Companys accounting policy, LII
does not discount its self-insurance or captive reserves. The
Company maintains safety and manufacturing programs that are
designed to improve the safety and effectiveness of its business
processes and, as a result, reduce the level and severity of its
various self-insurance risks.
The Companys reserves for self-insurance and captive risks
totaled $56.1 million and $54.1 million at
December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Actual payments
for claims reserved at December 31, 2005 may vary depending
on various factors including the development and ultimate
settlement of reported and unreported claims. To the extent
actuarial assumptions change and claims experience rates differ
from historical rates, the Companys liability may change.
In determining income for financial statement purposes, the
Company must make certain estimates and judgments in the
calculation of tax provisions and the resultant tax liabilities
and in the recoverability of deferred tax assets that arise from
temporary differences between the tax and financial statement
recognition of revenue and expense.
In the ordinary course of global business, there may be many
transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax outcome is
uncertain. The calculation of tax liabilities involves dealing
with uncertainties in the application of complex tax laws. The
Company recognizes potential liabilities for anticipated tax
audit issues in the U.S. and other tax jurisdictions based on an
estimate of the ultimate resolution of whether, and the extent
to which, additional taxes will be due. Although the Company
believes the estimates are reasonable, no assurance can be given
that the final outcome of these matters will not be different
than what is reflected in the historical income tax provisions
and accruals.
As part of the Companys financial process, the Company
must assess the likelihood that its deferred tax assets can be
recovered. If recovery is not likely, the provision for taxes
must be increased by recording a reserve in the form of a
valuation allowance for the deferred tax assets that are
estimated not to be ultimately recoverable. In this process,
certain relevant criteria are evaluated including the existence
of deferred tax liabilities that can be used to absorb deferred
tax assets, the taxable income in prior carryback years that can
be used to absorb net operating losses and credit carrybacks and
taxable income in future years. The Companys judgment
regarding future taxable income may change due to future market
conditions, changes in U.S. or international tax laws and
other factors. These changes, if any, may require material
adjustments to these deferred tax assets and an accompanying
reduction or increase in net income in the period when such
determinations are made.
In addition to the risks to the effective tax rate described
above, the effective tax rate reflected in forward-looking
statements is based on current tax law. Any significant changes
in the tax laws could affect these estimates.
35
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the
FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 151, Inventory Cost an
amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4
(SFAS No. 151). SFAS No. 151
clarifies the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility
expenses, freight, handling costs, and spoilage. It also
requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to
inventory be based on the normal capacity of production
facilities. SFAS No. 151 is effective for inventory
costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15,
2005. The Company is evaluating the provisions of this standard
to determine the effects, if any, on the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
Subsequent Events
On February 7, 2006, Allied Air Enterprises, a division of
the Companys Heating & Cooling segment, announced
that it has commenced plans to consolidate its manufacturing,
distribution, research & development, and
administrative operations in South Carolina, and close its
current operations in Bellevue, Ohio. The consolidation will be
a phased process expected to be completed by the end of the
first quarter of fiscal 2007. The Company expects the
consolidation to improve Allied Air Enterprises operating
efficiency, eliminate redundant fixed costs, and provide
customers with improved service. In conjunction with these
actions, the Company currently expects to incur
restructuring-related charges of approximately
$20.0 million pre-tax.
|
|
Item 7A. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk |
The information required by this item is included under the
caption Market Risk in Item 7 above.
36
|
|
Item 8. |
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data |
MANAGEMENTS REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL
REPORTING
Management of Lennox International Inc. (the
Company) is responsible for establishing and
maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting
and for the assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting. As defined by the Securities and
Exchange Commission, internal control over financial reporting
is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the
Companys principal executive and principal financial
officers, and effected by the Companys Board of Directors,
management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of the consolidated financial statements in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.
The Companys internal control over financial reporting
includes written policies and procedures that (1) pertain
to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the Companys transactions
and dispositions of the Companys assets; (2) provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary
to permit preparation of the financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts
and expenditures of the Company are being made only in
accordance with authorization of management and directors of the
Company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding
prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use,
or disposition of the Companys assets that could have a
material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management has undertaken an assessment of the effectiveness of
the Companys internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(the COSO Framework). Managements assessment included an
evaluation of the design of the Companys internal control
over financial reporting and testing of the operational
effectiveness of those controls. As a result of
managements assessment, the following material weakness in
internal control over financial reporting was identified as of
December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
The Company did not maintain effectively designed internal
controls to ensure accounting for derivative financial
instrument transactions in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles. Specifically, the Company did
not have policies and procedures in place to ensure compliance
with requirements to prepare contemporaneous documentation and
assess hedge effectiveness at the inception of certain
derivative financial instrument transactions. Furthermore, the
Company did not have policies and procedures in place to review
the propriety of accounting for certain commodity futures
contract transactions subsequent to the inception of such
contracts. These deficiencies in internal control over financial
reporting resulted in material errors related to the recognition
and classification of gains and losses on derivative contracts,
and resulted in restatements of the Companys
previously-filed interim consolidated financial statements for
the first three quarters of the year-ended December 31,
2005. |
As a result of the material weakness in internal control over
financial reporting described in the preceding paragraph,
management has concluded that as of December 31, 2005, the
Companys internal control over financial reporting was not
effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
KPMG LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that
audited the Companys consolidated financial statements
included in this report, has issued an audit report on
managements assessment of internal control over financial
reporting, a copy of which appears on the next page of this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
37
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Lennox International Inc.:
We have audited managements assessment, included in the
accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting (Item 8), that Lennox International
Inc. (the Company) did not maintain effective internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, because
of the effect of the material weakness identified in
managements assessment, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO). The Companys management is responsible for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting
and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on managements assessment and an opinion on the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal
control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, evaluating
managements assessment, testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of
control deficiencies, that results in more than a remote
likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim
financial statements will not be prevented or detected. The
following material weakness has been identified and included in
managements assessment as of December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
The Company did not maintain effectively designed internal
controls to ensure accounting for derivative financial
instrument transactions in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles. Specifically, the Company did
not have policies and procedures in place to ensure compliance
with requirements to prepare contemporaneous documentation and
assess hedge effectiveness at the inception of certain
derivative financial instrument transactions. Furthermore, the
Company did not have policies and procedures in place to review
the propriety of accounting for certain commodity futures
contract transactions subsequent to the inception of such
contracts. These deficiencies in internal control over financial
reporting resulted in material errors related to the recognition
and classification of gains and losses on derivative contracts,
and resulted in restatements of the Companys
previously-filed interim consolidated financial statements for
the first three quarters of the year-ended December 31,
2005. |
38
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
the consolidated balance sheets of Lennox International Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the
related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005. In
connection with our audits of the consolidated financial
statements, we have also audited financial statement
schedule II. The aforementioned material weakness was
considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of
audit tests applied in our audit of the 2005 consolidated
financial statements and the financial statement schedule and
this report does not affect our report dated March 16,
2006, which expressed an unqualified opinion on those
consolidated financial statements and the financial statement
schedule.
In our opinion, managements assessment that Lennox
International Inc. did not maintain effective internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, is fairly
stated, in all material respects, based on criteria established
in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). Also, in our opinion, because of the effect
of the material weakness described above on the achievement of
the objectives of the control criteria, the Company has not
maintained effective internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO).
/s/ KPMG LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 16, 2006
39
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Lennox International Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Lennox International Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders equity, and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2005. In connection with our audits of the
consolidated financial statements, we have also audited
financial statement schedule II. These consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedule II
are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedule based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Lennox International Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2005, in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in
our opinion, the related financial statement schedule for the
years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, when
considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial
statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material
respects, the information set forth therein.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
effectiveness of Lennox International Inc.s internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005,
based on criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report
dated March 16, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion on
managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting and an adverse opinion on the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
because of the existence of a material weakness.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 16, 2006
40
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of December 31, 2005 and 2004
(In millions, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
ASSETS |
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
213.5 |
|
|
$ |
60.9 |
|
|
Accounts and notes receivable, net
|
|
|
508.4 |
|
|
|
472.5 |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
242.4 |
|
|
|
247.2 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
20.3 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
62.6 |
|
|
|
45.9 |
|
|
Assets held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,047.2 |
|
|
|
844.7 |
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, net
|
|
|
255.7 |
|
|
|
234.0 |
|
GOODWILL
|
|
|
223.9 |
|
|
|
225.4 |
|
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
71.9 |
|
|
|
82.8 |
|
OTHER ASSETS
|
|
|
138.9 |
|
|
|
131.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$ |
1,737.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,518.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
6.0 |
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
36.4 |
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
296.8 |
|
|
|
237.0 |
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
321.7 |
|
|
|
286.3 |
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
24.8 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
Liabilities held for sale
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
656.5 |
|
|
|
584.0 |
|
LONG-TERM DEBT
|
|
|
108.0 |
|
|
|
268.1 |
|
POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS, OTHER THAN PENSIONS
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
PENSIONS
|
|
|
80.8 |
|
|
|
105.5 |
|
OTHER LIABILITIES
|
|
|
82.8 |
|
|
|
73.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
943.2 |
|
|
|
1,045.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 25,000,000 shares
authorized, no shares issued or outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value, 200,000,000 shares
authorized, 74,671,494 shares and 66,367,987 shares
issued for 2005 and 2004, respectively
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
649.3 |
|
|
|
454.1 |
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
191.0 |
|
|
|
66.8 |
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18.2 |
) |
|
Treasury stock, at cost, 3,635,947 shares and
3,044,286 shares for 2005 and 2004, respectively
|
|
|
(47.0 |
) |
|
|
(31.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
794.4 |
|
|
|
472.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
$ |
1,737.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,518.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
41
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
(In millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
NET SALES
|
|
$ |
3,366.2 |
|
|
$ |
2,982.7 |
|
|
$ |
2,789.9 |
|
COST OF GOODS SOLD
|
|
|
2,258.2 |
|
|
|
1,985.2 |
|
|
|
1,846.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
1,108.0 |
|
|
|
997.5 |
|
|
|
943.3 |
|
OPERATING EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
902.4 |
|
|
|
826.1 |
|
|
|
783.6 |
|
|
(Gains), losses and other expenses, net
|
|
|
(50.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
Restructuring charge
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operational income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
253.4 |
|
|
|
(36.6 |
) |
|
|
157.8 |
|
INTEREST EXPENSE, net
|
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
27.2 |
|
|
|
28.4 |
|
OTHER EXPENSE (INCOME)
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and
cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
235.0 |
|
|
|
(63.0 |
) |
|
|
131.8 |
|
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
83.0 |
|
|
|
30.5 |
|
|
|
45.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before cumulative
effect of accounting change
|
|
|
152.0 |
|
|
|
(93.5 |
) |
|
|
86.7 |
|
CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF ACCOUNTING CHANGE, NET
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
152.1 |
|
|
|
(93.5 |
) |
|
|
86.7 |
|
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations of discontinued operations
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
38.9 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
Income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(9.3 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
40.9 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
150.7 |
|
|
$ |
(134.4 |
) |
|
$ |
86.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE
CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF ACCOUNTING CHANGE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
2.37 |
|
|
$ |
(1.56 |
) |
|
$ |
1.49 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
2.13 |
|
|
$ |
(1.56 |
) |
|
$ |
1.36 |
|
CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF ACCOUNTING CHANGE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
2.37 |
|
|
$ |
(1.56 |
) |
|
$ |
1.49 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
2.13 |
|
|
$ |
(1.56 |
) |
|
$ |
1.36 |
|
(LOSS) PER SHARE FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.68 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.68 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
2.35 |
|
|
$ |
(2.24 |
) |
|
$ |
1.48 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
2.11 |
|
|
$ |
(2.24 |
) |
|
$ |
1.36 |
|
AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
64.2 |
|
|
|
60.0 |
|
|
|
58.4 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
73.7 |
|
|
|
60.0 |
|
|
|
68.3 |
|
CASH DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER SHARE
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.385 |
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
42
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
For the Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
(In millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued | |
|
Additional | |
|
|
|
Accumulated Other | |
|
|
|
Treasury | |
|
Total | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Paid-In | |
|
Retained | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
Deferred | |
|
Stock at | |
|
Stockholders | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Amount | |
|
Capital | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Income (Loss) | |
|
Compensation | |
|
Cost | |
|
Equity | |
|
Income (Loss) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2002
|
|
|
63.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
403.4 |
|
|
$ |
160.2 |
|
|
$ |
(78.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(21.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(30.7 |
) |
|
$ |
433.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86.4 |
|
|
$ |
86.4 |
|
|
Dividends, $0.38 per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63.7 |
|
|
|
63.7 |
|
|
Minimum pension liability adjustments, net of tax provision of
$0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives, net of tax provision of $0.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
Common stock issued
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefits of stock compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock purchases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
146.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2003
|
|
|
64.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
420.4 |
|
|
$ |
224.4 |
|
|
$ |
(18.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(18.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(31.1 |
) |
|
$ |
577.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(134.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(134.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(134.4 |
) |
|
Dividends, $0.385 per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.0 |
|
|
|
23.0 |
|
|
Minimum pension liability adjustments, net of tax provision of
$4.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.0 |
) |
|
|
(9.0 |
) |
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives, net of tax provision of $2.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
Common stock issued
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
20.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefits of stock compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock purchases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(115.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2004
|
|
|
66.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
454.1 |
|
|
$ |
66.8 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
(18.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(31.2 |
) |
|
$ |
472.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150.7 |
|
|
$ |
150.7 |
|
|
Dividends, $0.41 per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.9 |
) |
|
|
(10.9 |
) |
|
Minimum pension liability adjustments, net of tax benefit of $9.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
Adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
No. 123R
|
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives, net of tax provision of $3.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
|
Common stock issued
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption of Convertible Notes
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock purchases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15.8 |
) |
|
|
(15.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefits of stock compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
150.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
74.7 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
649.3 |
|
|
$ |
191.0 |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(47.0 |
) |
|
$ |
794.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
43
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Revised | |
|
Revised | |
|
|
|
|
(See Note 2) | |
|
(See Note 2) | |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
150.7 |
|
|
$ |
(134.4 |
) |
|
$ |
86.4 |
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(14.2 |
) |
|
|
(9.1 |
) |
|
|
(6.9 |
) |
|
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
Non-cash restructuring expenses
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash impairment of long-lived assets and goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on futures contracts
|
|
|
(23.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock based compensation expense
|
|
|
28.8 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
37.4 |
|
|
|
42.6 |
|
|
|
46.1 |
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
Other (gains), losses and expenses, net
|
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of
divestitures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts and notes receivable
|
|
|
(53.6 |
) |
|
|
(57.3 |
) |
|
|
(145.2 |
) |
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(28.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
(16.2 |
) |
|
|
(8.0 |
) |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
64.4 |
|
|
|
(15.4 |
) |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
40.3 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
|
Income taxes payable and receivable
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
|
|
23.8 |
|
|
|
|
Long-term warranty, deferred income and other liabilities
|
|
|
(16.9 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities from
discontinued operations
|
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
36.1 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
228.7 |
|
|
|
57.4 |
|
|
|
56.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the disposal of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(63.3 |
) |
|
|
(40.3 |
) |
|
|
(39.7 |
) |
|
Dividends from affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional investment in affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
Proceeds from disposal of investments (continuing operations)
|
|
|
39.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities from
discontinued operations
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(20.8 |
) |
|
|
(17.9 |
) |
|
|
(22.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term (repayments) borrowings, net
|
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
(6.8 |
) |
|
Long-term debt (repayments) borrowings, net
|
|
|
(36.3 |
) |
|
|
(56.3 |
) |
|
|
(15.4 |
) |
|
Revolver long-term (repayments) borrowings, net
|
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
Sales of common stock
|
|
|
25.8 |
|
|
|
20.4 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
Payments of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
Repurchases of common stock
|
|
|
(15.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
Excess tax benefits related to share based payments
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid
|
|
|
(24.8 |
) |
|
|
(22.8 |
) |
|
|
(22.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(56.9 |
) |
|
|
(55.1 |
) |
|
|
(31.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
151.0 |
|
|
|
(15.6 |
) |
|
|
2.4 |
|
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of year
|
|
|
60.9 |
|
|
|
76.1 |
|
|
|
74.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of year
|
|
$ |
213.5 |
|
|
$ |
60.9 |
|
|
$ |
76.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplementary disclosures of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$ |
16.3 |
|
|
$ |
29.7 |
|
|
$ |
30.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes (net of refunds)
|
|
$ |
66.1 |
|
|
$ |
17.4 |
|
|
$ |
9.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
44
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
Lennox International Inc., a Delaware corporation, and
subsidiaries (the Company or LII), is a
leading global provider of climate control solutions. The
Company designs, manufactures and markets a broad range of
products for the heating, ventilation, air conditioning and
refrigeration (HVACR) markets. The Company
participates in four reportable business segments of the HVACR
industry. The first reportable segment is Residential
Heating & Cooling, in which LII manufactures and
markets a full line of heating, air conditioning and hearth
products for the residential replacement and new construction
markets in the United States and Canada. The second reportable
segment is Commercial Heating & Cooling, in which LII
manufactures and sells rooftop products and related equipment
for commercial applications. Combined, the Residential
Heating & Cooling and Commercial Heating &
Cooling reportable business segments form LIIs
heating and cooling business. The third reportable segment is
Service Experts, which includes sales and installation of, and
maintenance and repair services for, HVAC equipment by LII-owned
service centers in the United States and Canada. The fourth
reportable segment is Refrigeration, which manufactures and
sells unit coolers, condensing units and other commercial
refrigeration products. See Note 3 for financial
information regarding the Companys reportable segments.
The Company sells its products and services to numerous types of
customers, including distributors, installing dealers,
homeowners, national accounts and original equipment
manufacturers.
|
|
2. |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: |
|
|
|
Principles of Consolidation |
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Lennox International Inc. and its majority-owned subsidiaries.
All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
The Company considers all highly liquid temporary investments
with original maturity dates of three months or less to be cash
equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents of $213.5 million
and $60.9 million as of December 31, 2005 and 2004,
respectively, consisted of cash, overnight repurchase agreements
and investment grade securities and are stated at cost, which
approximates fair value. The Company earned interest income of
$4.2 million, $5.0 million and $3.5 million for
the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003,
respectively, which is included in interest expense, net in the
accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.
As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, $23.1 million and
$19.8 million, respectively, of cash and cash equivalents
were restricted primarily due to routine lockbox collections and
letters of credit issued with respect to the operations of the
Companys captive insurance subsidiary, which expire on
December 30, 2006. These letter of credit restrictions can
be transferred to the Companys revolving lines of credit
as needed.
|
|
|
Accounts and Notes Receivable |
Accounts and notes receivable are shown in the accompanying
Consolidated Balance Sheets, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $16.7 million and $18.5 million, as of
December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The Company has
no significant concentration of credit risk within its accounts
and notes receivable.
45
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Inventory costs include material, labor, depreciation and plant
overhead. Inventories of $129.4 million and
$121.2 million in 2005 and 2004, respectively, are valued
at the lower of cost or market using the
last-in, first-out
(LIFO) cost method. The remaining portion of the inventory
is valued at the lower of cost or market with cost being
determined either on the
first-in, first-out
(FIFO) basis or average cost. The Company elected to use
the LIFO inventory valuation method for the Companys
domestic manufacturing companies in 1974 and continued to elect
the LIFO method for new operations through the late 1980s.
The types of inventory include raw materials, purchased
components, work-in-process, repair parts and finished goods.
Starting in the late 1990s, the Company began adopting the
FIFO inventory valuation method for all new domestic
manufacturing operations (primarily acquisitions). The
Companys operating entities with a previous LIFO election
continue to use LIFO accounting. The Company also uses the FIFO
inventory method for all of the Companys foreign-based
manufacturing facilities as well as the Companys Service
Experts segment, whose inventory is limited to service parts and
finished goods. LIFO inventory liquidations did not have a
material impact on gross margins during the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003.
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment |
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost, net of
accumulated depreciation. Expenditures for renewals and
betterments are capitalized and expenditures for maintenance and
repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Depreciation is
computed using the straight-line method over the following
estimated useful lives:
|
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
10 to 39 years |
Machinery and equipment
|
|
3 to 10 years |
The Company periodically reviews long-lived assets for
impairment as events or changes in circumstances indicate that
the carrying amount of such assets might not be recoverable. In
order to assess recoverability, the Company compares the
estimated expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without
interest charges) identified with each long-lived asset or
related asset grouping to the carrying amount of such assets. If
the expected future cash flows do not exceed the carrying value
of the asset or assets being reviewed, an impairment loss is
recognized based on the excess of the carrying amount of the
impaired assets over their fair value.
In March 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 47,
Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement
Obligations An Interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 143 (FIN No. 47), which
was effective for the Company as of December 31, 2005. This
interpretation provides additional guidance as to when companies
should record the fair value of a liability for a conditional
asset retirement obligation when there is uncertainty about the
timing or method of settlement of the obligation. The cumulative
effect of the change in accounting related to the adoption of
FIN No. 47 was not material for the year ended
December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
Investments in Affiliates |
Investments in affiliates in which the Company does not exercise
control and has a 20% or more voting interest are accounted for
using the equity method of accounting. If the fair value of an
investment in an affiliate is below its carrying value and the
difference is deemed to be other than temporary, the difference
between the fair value and the carrying value is charged to
earnings.
Investments in affiliated companies accounted for under the
equity method consist of a 24.5% common stock ownership interest
in Alliance Compressor LLC, a joint venture engaged in the
manufacture and sale of compressors; and a 50% common stock
ownership in Frigus-Bohn, a Mexican joint venture that produces
unit coolers and condensing units. The Company also owns a 20%
common stock ownership interest in Kulthorn
46
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Kirby Public Company Limited, a Thailand company engaged in the
manufacture of compressors for refrigeration applications. The
Company had been accounting for its investment in Kulthorn Kirby
Public Company Limited as a marketable equity security
investment. In October 2004, the Company purchased an additional
1.3% common stock interest for approximately $1.5 million.
The Company has adjusted prior years information to reflect the
change to equity accounting.
As of December 31, 2004, the Company held a 45% common
stock ownership interest in Outokumpu Heatcraft, a joint venture
engaged in the manufacture and sale of heat transfer components,
primarily coils. The Company accounted for its investment in
Outokumpu Heatcraft using the equity method. On June 7,
2005, the Company completed the sale of its 45% interest in its
heat transfer joint venture to Outokumpu Copper Products OY of
Finland (Outokumpu) for $39.3 million pursuant to which the
Company recorded a pre-tax gain of $9.3 million, which is
included in (Gains), Losses and Other Expenses, Net in the
accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. In
connection with the sale, the Company entered into an agreement
with Outokumpu related to joint remediation of certain existing
environmental matters. In conjunction with the new agreement,
the Company updated its estimate of its portion of the on-going
remediation costs and recorded expenses of $2.2 million for
the year ended December 31, 2005.
The Company has recorded $14.2 million, $9.1 million
and $6.8 million of equity in the earnings of these
affiliates for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and
2003, respectively, and has included these amounts in Selling,
General and Administrative Expense in the accompanying
Consolidated Statements of Operations. The carrying amount of
investments in affiliates as of December 31, 2005 and 2004
is $46.0 million and $63.0 million, respectively, and
is included in long-term Other Assets in the accompanying
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
|
|
|
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets |
Goodwill represents the excess of cost over fair value of assets
of businesses acquired. Goodwill and intangible assets acquired
in a purchase business combination and determined to have an
indefinite useful life are not amortized, but instead tested for
impairment at least annually in accordance with the provisions
of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,
(SFAS No. 142). SFAS No. 142
also requires that intangible assets with estimable useful lives
be amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to
their estimated residual values, and reviewed for impairment in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 144, Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets. Goodwill is tested at least annually by
reporting unit for impairment. The Company completes its annual
goodwill impairment tests in the first quarter of each fiscal
year.
The Company estimates reporting unit fair values using standard
business valuation techniques such as discounted cash flows and
reference to comparable business transactions. The discounted
cash flows fair value estimates are based on managements
projected future cash flows and the estimated weighted average
cost of capital. The estimated weighted average cost of capital
is based on the risk-free interest rate and other factors such
as equity risk premiums and the ratio of total debt and equity
capital.
Based on the results of its annual impairment tests required by
SFAS No. 142, the Company determined that no
impairment of its goodwill existed as of December 31, 2005
or 2003, respectively, and in 2004, the Company recorded an
impairment charge associated with its Service Experts segment.
This impairment charge reflected the segments performance
below managements expectations and managements
decision to divest of 48 centers that no longer matched the
realigned Service Experts business model (see
Note 6 Divestitures). The Company estimated the
fair value of its Service Experts segment using the income
method of valuation, which included the use of estimated
discounted cash flows. Based on the comparison, the carrying
value of Service Experts exceeded its fair value. Accordingly,
the Company performed the second step of the test, comparing the
implied fair value of Service Experts goodwill with the carrying
amount of that
47
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
goodwill. Based on this assessment, the Company recorded a
non-cash impairment charge of $208.0 million
($184.8 million, net of tax), which is included as a
component of Operating Income in the accompanying Consolidated
Statements of Operations. In 2004, the Company also recognized a
$14.8 million ($13.2 million, net of tax) goodwill
impairment charge arising from goodwill allocated to centers
held for sale and a $3.1 million pre-tax impairment charge
related to property, plant and equipment. These amounts are
included as a part of Loss from Discontinued Operations in the
accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.
In addition, the Company periodically reviews long-lived assets
with estimable useful lives for impairment as events or changes
in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such
assets might not be recoverable. In order to assess
recoverability, the Company compares the estimated expected
future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges)
identified with each long-lived asset or related asset grouping
to the carrying amount of such assets. For purposes of such
comparisons, portions of goodwill are attributed to related
long-lived assets and identifiable intangible assets based upon
relative fair values of such assets at acquisition. If the
expected future cash flows do not exceed the carrying value of
the asset or assets being reviewed, an impairment loss is
recognized based on the excess of the carrying amount of the
impaired assets over their fair value.
In assessing the fair value of its goodwill and other
intangibles, the Company must make assumptions regarding
estimated future cash flows and other factors to determine the
fair value of the respective assets . If these estimates or the
related assumptions change, the Company may be required to
record impairment charges for these assets in the future.
Shipping and handling costs relate to post-production activities
and are included as part of Selling, General and Administrative
Expense in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of
Operations in the following amounts (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
$158.2
|
|
$139.4 |
|
$127.3 |
A liability for estimated warranty expense is established by a
charge against operations at the time the Company recognizes
revenue. The subsequent costs incurred for warranty claims serve
to reduce the accrued product warranty liability. The Company
recorded warranty expense of $36.3 million,
$28.2 million and $24.1 million for the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
The Companys estimate of future warranty costs is
determined for each product line. The number of units that are
expected to be repaired or replaced is determined by applying
the estimated failure rate, which is generally based on
historical experience, to the number of units that have been
sold and are still under warranty. The estimated units to be
repaired under warranty are multiplied by the average cost
(undiscounted) to repair or replace such products to
determine the Companys estimated future warranty cost. The
Company also provides for specifically identified warranty
obligations. The Companys estimated future warranty cost
is subject to adjustment from time to time depending on changes
in actual failure rate and cost experience.
48
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Total liabilities for estimated warranty expense are
$80.9 million and $71.0 million as of
December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and are included
in the following captions on the accompanying Consolidated
Balance Sheets (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Accrued Expenses
|
|
$ |
25.3 |
|
|
$ |
26.8 |
|
Other Liabilities
|
|
|
55.6 |
|
|
|
44.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
80.9 |
|
|
$ |
71.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The changes in the carrying amount of the Companys total
warranty liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2005
and 2004 are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Total warranty liability at December 31, 2003
|
|
$ |
65.4 |
|
Payments made in 2004
|
|
|
(22.6 |
) |
Changes resulting from issuance of new warranties
|
|
|
26.1 |
|
Changes in estimates associated with pre-existing liabilities
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total warranty liability at December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
71.0 |
|
Payments made in 2005
|
|
|
(26.4 |
) |
Changes resulting from issuance of new warranties
|
|
|
28.8 |
|
Changes in estimates associated with pre-existing warranties
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total warranty liability at December 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
80.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
During the second quarter of 2004, the Company determined that
it would no longer produce or sell its
CompleteHeat®
product line. Concurrently, the Company adjusted its warranty on
this product by an additional $2.6 million based on the
fact that it was discontinuing this product with no like
replacement. The change in warranty liability that results from
changes in estimates of other warranties issued prior to 2004 is
not material. The change in warranty liability that resulted
from changes in estimates of warranties issued prior to 2005 was
primarily due to revaluing warranty reserves based on higher
material input costs and increased labor allowances on the
Companys product lines, including the
CompleteHeat®
product line.
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability
method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for
the future tax consequences attributable to differences between
the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss
and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to
apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect
of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities
is recognized in income in the period that includes the
enactment date.
The Companys Residential Heating & Cooling,
Commercial Heating & Cooling and Refrigeration segments
recognize revenue when products are shipped to customers. The
Companys Service Experts segment recognizes sales,
installation, maintenance and repair revenues at the time the
services are completed. The Service Experts segment also
provides HVAC system design and installation services under
fixed-price contracts, which may extend up to one year. Revenue
for these services is recognized using the
percentage-of-completion
method, based on the percentage of incurred contract
costs-to-date in
relation to total estimated
49
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
contract costs, after giving effect to the most recent estimates
of total cost. The effect of changes to total estimated contract
revenue or cost is recognized in the period such changes are
determined. Provisions for estimated losses on individual
contracts are made in the period in which the loss first becomes
apparent. The adoption of Emerging Issues Task Force Issues
No. 00-21,
Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables, in
June 2003 did not have a material impact on the Companys
financial statements.
The Company engages in cooperative advertising, customer rebate,
cash discount and other miscellaneous programs that result in
payments or credits being issued to its customers. The
Companys policy is to record the discounts and incentives
as reduction of sales when the sales are recorded, with the
exception of certain cooperative advertising expenditures that
are charge to Selling, General and Administrative Expense. The
amounts charged to Selling, General and Administrative Expense
were approximately $11.7 million, $8.9 million and
$6.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2005,
2004 and 2003, respectively. Under these cooperative advertising
programs, the Company receives, or will receive, an identifiable
benefit (goods or services) in exchange for the consideration
given. The identified benefit is sufficiently separable from the
customers purchase of the Companys products such
that the Company could have entered into an exchange transaction
with a party other than the customer in order to receive the
benefit. Additionally, the Company can reasonably estimate the
fair value of the benefit that the Company receives, or will
receive, and the amount of the consideration paid by the Company
does not exceed the estimated fair value of the benefit received.
The principal components of cost of goods sold in the
Companys manufacturing operations are component costs, raw
materials, factory overhead, labor and estimated costs of
warranty expense. In the Companys Service Experts segment,
the principal components of costs of goods sold are equipment,
parts and supplies and labor. These principal components of
costs include inbound freight charges, purchasing, receiving and
inspection costs, internal transfer costs and warehousing costs
through he manufacturing process.
|
|
|
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses |
Selling, general and administrative expenses include
(a) all other payroll and benefit costs; (b) outbound
freight, post-production warehousing and distribution costs;
(c) advertising; (d) general selling and
administrative costs, which include research and development and
information technology costs; (e) other selling, general
and administrative related costs such as insurance, travel, and
non-production depreciation and rent; and (f) equity in
earnings of unconsolidated affiliates.
50
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
(Gains), Losses and Other Expenses, Net |
(Gain), losses and other expenses, net were
$(50.2) million, zero and $1.9 million for the years
ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively and
included the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Realized gains on settled futures contracts
|
|
$ |
(16.7 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Unrealized gains on open futures contracts
|
|
|
(23.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of LIIs 45% interest in its heat transfer
joint venture to Outokumpu
|
|
|
(9.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated on-going remediation costs in conjunction with the
joint remediation agreement LII entered into with Outokumpu
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve requirements related to the Companys former joint
venture agreement with Outokumpu
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
Loss on sale of HVAC distributor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
Gain on sale of Electrical Products Division
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
Gain on sale of Europe manufacturing facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
Other items, net
|
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gains), losses and other expenses, net
|
|
$ |
(50.2 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123R Share-Based
Payment (SFAS No. 123R). SFAS No. 123R
requires compensation cost to be measured for all outstanding
unvested share-based awards at fair value for all interim and
annual periods beginning after June 15, 2005. In March
2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 Share-Based
Payment (SAB No. 107), which
provided further clarification on the implementation of
SFAS No. 123R. On April 14, 2005, the SEC
announced a deferral of the effective date of
SFAS No. 123R for calendar year companies until the
beginning of 2006; however, the Company elected to adopt the
provisions of SFAS No. 123R early with an
implementation date of July 1, 2005, as permitted by the
standard. Prior to July 1, 2005, the Company accounted for
stock-based awards under the intrinsic value method, which
follows the recognition and measurement principles of Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees and Related Interpretations (APB
No. 25), as permitted by FASB Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation
(SFAS No. 123).
Effective July 1, 2005, the Company adopted the fair value
recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123R using the
modified-prospective-transition method. Under that transition
method, compensation cost recognized in the second half of 2005
included: (a) compensation cost for all share-based
payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of July 1,
2005, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance
with the original provisions of SFAS No. 123 and
(b) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted
subsequent to July 1, 2005, based on the grant-date fair
value estimated in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 123R. In accordance with
SFAS No. 123R, results for prior periods have not been
restated. Compensation expense of $28.8 million,
$11.9 million and $6.1 million was recognized for the
year ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively,
and is included in Selling, General and Administrative Expense
in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations for the
year ended December 31, 2005. The cumulative effect of the
change in accounting related to the adoption of
SFAS No. 123R was not material for the year ended
December 31, 2005.
51
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, the Company
presented all tax benefits of deductions resulting from the
exercise of stock options as operating cash flows in the
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. SFAS No. 123R
requires the cash flows from the tax benefits of tax deductions
in excess of the compensation cost recognized for those options
(excess tax benefits) to be classified as financing cash flows.
The $6.9 million excess tax benefits classified as a
financing cash inflow in the accompanying Consolidated Statement
of Cash Flows as of December 31, 2005 would have been
classified as an operating cash inflow if the Company had not
adopted SFAS No. 123R.
Had the Company used the fair value based accounting method for
stock-based compensation expense described by
SFAS No. 123 for the fiscal 2005 period, prior to
July 1, 2005, and the 2004 and 2003 periods, the
Companys diluted net income (loss) per common and
equivalent share for the years ended December 31, 2005,
2004 and 2003, respectively, would have been as set forth in the
table below (in millions, except per share data). As of
July 1, 2005, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123R
thereby eliminating pro forma disclosure for periods following
such adoption. For purposes of this pro forma disclosure, the
value of the options is estimated using a Black-Scholes-Merton
option valuation model and amortized to expense over the
options vesting periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net income (loss), as reported
|
|
$ |
150.7 |
|
|
$ |
(134.4 |
) |
|
$ |
86.4 |
|
Add: Reported stock based compensation expense, net of taxes
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Deduct: Fair value based compensation expense, net of taxes
|
|
|
(19.4 |
) |
|
|
(10.0 |
) |
|
|
(9.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss), pro-forma
|
|
$ |
149.7 |
|
|
$ |
(136.9 |
) |
|
$ |
81.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic, as reported
|
|
$ |
2.35 |
|
|
$ |
(2.24 |
) |
|
$ |
1.48 |
|
Basic, pro forma
|
|
$ |
2.33 |
|
|
$ |
(2.28 |
) |
|
$ |
1.39 |
|
Diluted, as reported
|
|
$ |
2.11 |
|
|
$ |
(2.24 |
) |
|
$ |
1.36 |
|
Diluted, pro forma
|
|
$ |
2.09 |
|
|
$ |
(2.28 |
) |
|
$ |
1.28 |
|
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. The
Company expended approximately $40.3 million,
$37.6 million and $38.0 million for the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, for
research and product development activities. Research and
development costs are included in Selling, General and
Administrative Expense in the accompanying Consolidated
Statements of Operations.
The costs of advertising, promotion and marketing programs are
charged to operations in the period incurred. Expense relating
to advertising, promotions and marketing programs was
$79.6 million, $68.4 million and $72.4 million
for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003,
respectively, and is included in Selling, General and
Administrative Expense in the accompanying Consolidated
Statements of Operations.
|
|
|
Translation of Foreign Currencies |
All assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries and joint
ventures are translated into United States dollars using rates
of exchange in effect at the balance sheet date. Revenues and
expenses are translated at average exchange rates during the
respective years. The unrealized translation gains and losses
are included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) in
the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.
52
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Transaction gains included in Other Income in the accompanying
Consolidated Statements of Operations were $2.7 million,
$1.8 million and $4.2 million for the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Derivative financial instruments are recognized as either assets
or liabilities in the balance sheet and are carried at fair
value. Changes in fair value of these instruments are recognized
periodically in earnings or stockholders equity depending
on the intended use of the instrument. Gains or losses arising
from the changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as
fair value hedges are recognized in earnings. Gains or losses
arising from the changes in the fair value of derivatives
designated as cash flow hedges are initially reported as a
component of other comprehensive income and later classified
into cost of goods sold in the period in which the hedged item
also affects earnings. The Company hedges its exposure to the
fluctuation on the prices paid for copper and aluminum by
purchasing futures contracts on these metals. Gains or losses
recognized on the closing of these contracts adjust the cost of
the physical deliveries of these metals. Quantities covered by
these commodity futures contracts are for less than actual
quantities expected to be purchased. As of December 31,
2005 and 2004, the Company had metals futures contracts for
which the fair value was $24.0 million and
$10.3 million, respectively. The open futures contracts as
of December 31, 2005 mature at various dates to
December 31, 2007. In 2005, the Company determined that
these futures contracts did not qualify for hedge accounting
under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities (SFAS No. 133) as the
Companys documentation did not meet the criteria in order
for the hedging instruments to qualify for cash flow
designation. Accordingly, the Company recorded an unrealized
gain of $23.3 million for the year ended December 31,
2005 related to the open futures contracts, which is included in
(Gains), Losses and Other Expenses, Net in the accompany
Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Certain amounts have been reclassified from the prior year
presentation to conform to the current year presentation.
|
|
|
Revisions to Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the
Years Ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 |
In 2005, the Company has separately disclosed the operating and
financing portions of the cash flows attributable to the
Companys discontinued operations, which in prior periods
were reported on a combined basis.
|
|
3. |
Reportable Business Segments: |
The Company operates in four reportable business segments of the
HVACR markets: Residential Heating & Cooling,
Commercial Heating & Cooling, Service Experts and
Refrigeration. The Companys management uses segment profit
(loss) as the primary measure of profitability to evaluate
operating performance and to allocate capital resources. The
Company defines segment profit (loss) as a segments net
53
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
earnings before other expense (income), interest expense,
goodwill impairment, restructuring charge, (gains), losses and
other expenses, net and income taxes.
Net sales and segment profit (loss) by business segment, along
with a reconciliation of segment profit (loss) to net earnings
(loss) for years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 are
shown below (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
$ |
1,685.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,419.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,358.7 |
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
651.7 |
|
|
|
580.8 |
|
|
|
508.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heating & Cooling
|
|
|
2,337.5 |
|
|
|
2,000.6 |
|
|
|
1,867.1 |
|
|
Service Experts
|
|
|
641.4 |
|
|
|
611.7 |
|
|
|
611.3 |
|
|
Refrigeration
|
|
|
467.2 |
|
|
|
444.7 |
|
|
|
387.2 |
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
(79.9 |
) |
|
|
(74.3 |
) |
|
|
(75.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,366.2 |
|
|
$ |
2,982.7 |
|
|
$ |
2,789.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Profit (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
$ |
197.5 |
|
|
$ |
169.7 |
|
|
$ |
152.1 |
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
53.7 |
|
|
|
51.2 |
|
|
|
38.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heating & Cooling
|
|
|
251.2 |
|
|
|
220.9 |
|
|
|
190.1 |
|
|
Service Experts
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
Refrigeration
|
|
|
40.3 |
|
|
|
42.7 |
|
|
|
36.2 |
|
|
Corporate and other
|
|
|
(103.1 |
) |
|
|
(91.6 |
) |
|
|
(69.0 |
) |
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Profit
|
|
|
205.6 |
|
|
|
171.4 |
|
|
|
159.7 |
|
|
Reconciliation to income (loss) from continuing operations
before income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gains), losses and other expenses, net
|
|
|
(50.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
Restructurings
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
27.2 |
|
|
|
28.4 |
|
|
Other expense (income)
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
235.0 |
|
|
$ |
(63.0 |
) |
|
$ |
131.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Total assets by business segment as of December 31, 2005
and 2004 are shown below (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Total Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
$ |
589.1 |
|
|
$ |
512.0 |
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
234.3 |
|
|
|
244.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heating & Cooling
|
|
|
823.4 |
|
|
|
756.0 |
|
|
Service Experts
|
|
|
185.3 |
|
|
|
187.8 |
|
|
Refrigeration
|
|
|
308.9 |
|
|
|
323.9 |
|
|
Corporate and other
|
|
|
432.1 |
|
|
|
258.2 |
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
(12.1 |
) |
|
|
(12.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment assets
|
|
|
1,737.6 |
|
|
|
1,513.5 |
|
|
Discontinued operations (Note 6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,737.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,518.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditures by business segment for the years
ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 are shown below (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Capital Expenditures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
$ |
34.7 |
|
|
$ |
24.0 |
|
|
$ |
19.8 |
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heating & Cooling
|
|
|
43.3 |
|
|
|
29.5 |
|
|
|
28.3 |
|
|
Service Experts
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
Refrigeration
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
Corporate and other
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
63.3 |
|
|
$ |
40.3 |
|
|
$ |
39.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The depreciation and amortization expense by business segment
for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 are
shown below (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
$ |
16.9 |
|
|
$ |
18.6 |
|
|
$ |
16.8 |
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heating & Cooling
|
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
23.5 |
|
|
|
21.7 |
|
|
Service Experts
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
Refrigeration
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
Corporate and other
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
37.4 |
|
|
$ |
42.6 |
|
|
$ |
46.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table sets forth certain financial information
relating to the Companys operations by geographic area
based on the domicile of the Companys operations (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net Sales to External Customers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$ |
2,603.0 |
|
|
$ |
2,254.8 |
|
|
$ |
2,135.1 |
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
294.6 |
|
|
|
272.7 |
|
|
|
260.2 |
|
|
International
|
|
|
468.6 |
|
|
|
455.2 |
|
|
|
394.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales to external customers
|
|
$ |
3,366.2 |
|
|
$ |
2,982.7 |
|
|
$ |
2,789.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Long-Lived Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$ |
448.1 |
|
|
$ |
414.5 |
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
105.8 |
|
|
|
109.4 |
|
|
International
|
|
|
136.5 |
|
|
|
150.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-lived assets
|
|
$ |
690.4 |
|
|
$ |
673.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of inventories are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Finished goods
|
|
$ |
174.0 |
|
|
$ |
174.1 |
|
Repair parts
|
|
|
35.8 |
|
|
|
38.5 |
|
Work in process
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
Raw materials
|
|
|
79.1 |
|
|
|
71.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
297.5 |
|
|
|
293.2 |
|
Excess of current cost over last-in, first-out cost
|
|
|
(55.1 |
) |
|
|
(46.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
242.4 |
|
|
$ |
247.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. |
Property, Plant and Equipment: |
Components of property, plant and equipment are as follows (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Land
|
|
$ |
30.3 |
|
|
$ |
31.2 |
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
177.1 |
|
|
|
177.3 |
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
512.9 |
|
|
|
479.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
720.3 |
|
|
|
687.8 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(464.6 |
) |
|
|
(453.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
$ |
255.7 |
|
|
$ |
234.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
Sale of Interest in Heat Transfer Joint Venture |
On June 7, 2005, the Company completed the sale of its 45%
interest in its heat transfer joint venture to Outokumpu Copper
Products OY of Finland (Outokumpu) for $39.3 million
pursuant to which the Company recorded a pre-tax gain of
$9.3 million, which is included in (Gains), Losses and
Other Expenses, net in the accompanying Consolidated Statements
of Operations. In connection with the sale, the Company entered
into an agreement with Outokumpu related to joint remediation of
certain existing environmental matters. In conjunction with the
new agreement, the Company updated its estimate of its portion
of the on-going remediation costs and recorded expenses of
$2.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
Service Experts Discontinued Operations |
In the first fiscal quarter of 2004, the Companys Board of
Directors approved a turnaround plan designed to improve the
performance of its Service Experts business segment. The plan
realigned Service Experts dealer service centers to focus
on service and replacement opportunities in the residential and
light commercial markets. The Company identified approximately
130 centers, whose primary business is residential and light
commercial service and replacement. These centers comprise the
ongoing Service Experts business segment. As of
December 31, 2004, the Company had divested the remaining
48 centers that no longer match the realigned business model.
The operating results of the 48 centers that are no longer a
part of Service Experts are classified as a Discontinued
Operation in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of
Operations for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and
2003. The related assets and liabilities for these centers are
classified as Assets Held for Sale and Liabilities Held for Sale
in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets as of
December 31, 2005 and 2004.
A summary of net trade sales, pre-tax operating results and
pre-tax loss on disposal of assets for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the major classes of assets
and liabilities presented as held for sale at December 31,
2005 and 2004, are detailed below (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued Operations | |
|
|
For the Year | |
|
|
Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net trade sales
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
228.9 |
|
|
$ |
325.8 |
|
Pre-tax (loss) income operating results
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
(38.9 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Pre-tax loss on disposal of assets
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(14.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Current assets
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5.1 |
|
Current liabilities
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table details the Companys pre-tax loss from
discontinued operations for the years ended December 31,
2005 and 2004 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year | |
|
Cumulative incurred | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
through | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Goodwill impairment
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14.8 |
|
|
$ |
14.8 |
|
Impairment of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
Other divestiture costs
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
38.9 |
|
|
|
40.9 |
|
Loss on disposal of centers
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loss from discontinued operations
|
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
|
$ |
53.8 |
|
|
$ |
55.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The income tax benefit on discontinued operations was
$0.7 million and $12.9 million for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The income tax
benefit on discontinued operations for the year ended
December 31, 2004 of $12.9 million includes a
$1.6 million tax benefit related to goodwill impairment.
Through December 31, 2005, proceeds from the sale of these
centers totaled $25.8 million.
|
|
7. |
Restructuring Charges: |
During 2001, the Company undertook separate initiatives to
restructure its Service Experts operations and certain of its
manufacturing and distribution operations. During 2002, the
Company undertook an additional initiative to restructure its
non-core Heat Transfer engineering business. The Company
recorded no material charges for the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, related to
these restructuring initiatives. As of December 31, 2005
and 2004, the Company had restructuring reserves of
$0.8 million and $1.3 million, respectively related to
these restructuring initiatives, which are included in Accrued
Expenses in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. For
the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, the
Company made cash payments of $0.2 million,
$0.4 million and $8.4 million, respectively related to
these restructuring initiatives.
Due to competitive cost pressures, on April 4, 2005, Lennox
Hearth Products Inc., a subsidiary of the Company, commenced
plans to relocate its Whitfield pellet stove and Lennox cast
iron product lines from Burlington, Washington to a
third party production facility in Juarez, Mexico,
discontinue its existing steel wood stove line manufactured in
Burlington, and close the Burlington facility. These actions
were substantially complete as of December 31, 2005. In
connection with the plant closure, the Company recorded
pre-tax
restructuring-related charges of $2.4 million, which are
included in Restructuring Charge in the accompanying
Consolidated Statements of Operations for 2005. As of
December 31, 2005, the Company had $0.8 million in
restructuring reserves relating to the Burlington plant closure,
which are included in Accrued Expenses in the accompanying
December 31, 2005 Consolidated Balance Sheet.
58
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
8. |
Long-Term Debt and Lines of Credit: |
Long-term debt at December 31 consisted of the following
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Floating rate revolving loans payable
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
6.25% convertible subordinate notes, payable in 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143.8 |
|
6.73% promissory notes, payable $11.1 annually through 2008
|
|
|
33.3 |
|
|
|
44.4 |
|
6.56% promissory notes, payable in 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.0 |
|
6.75% promissory notes, payable in 2008
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
8.00% promissory note, payable in 2010
|
|
|
35.0 |
|
|
|
35.0 |
|
Capitalized lease obligations and other
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119.3 |
|
|
|
304.5 |
|
|
Less current maturities
|
|
|
(11.3 |
) |
|
|
(36.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
108.0 |
|
|
$ |
268.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2005, the aggregate amounts of required
principal payments on long-term debt are as follows (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
$ |
11.3 |
|
2007
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
2008
|
|
|
61.3 |
|
2009
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
2010
|
|
|
35.1 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
119.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
In June 2004, LII made a pre-payment on its long-term debt of
$35 million, which was scheduled to mature in the third
quarter of 2005. The
pre-payment
make-whole amount
associated with the debt was $1.9 million and was expensed
in 2004 and is included in Interest Expense, net in the
accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The Company has bank lines of credit aggregating
$427.5 million, of which $1.2 million was borrowed and
outstanding and $90.7 million was committed to standby
letters of credit at December 31, 2005. Of the remaining
$335.6 million, the entire amount was available for future
borrowings after consideration of covenant limitations. Included
in the lines of credit are several regional facilities and a
multi-currency facility governed by agreements between the
Company and a syndicate of banks. In July 2005, the Company
amended and restated its revolving credit facility to, among
other things, increase the borrowing capacity from
$225 million to $400 million and extend the maturity
date from September 2006 to July 2010. As of December 31,
2005 and 2004, the Company has unamortized debt issuance costs
of $2.5 million and $4.9 million, respectively, which
are included in other assets in the accompanying Consolidated
Balance Sheets. The facility contains certain financial
covenants and bears interest at a rate equal to, at the
Companys option, either (a) the greater of the
banks prime rate or the federal funds rate plus 0.5%, or
(b) the London Interbank Offered Rate plus a margin equal
to 0.475% to 1.20%, depending upon the ratio of total funded
debt-to-adjusted
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
(Adjusted EBITDA), as defined in the facility.
The Company pays a facility fee, depending upon the ratio of
total funded debt to Adjusted EBITDA, equal to 0.15% to 0.30% of
the capacity. The facility includes restrictive covenants that
limit the Companys ability to incur additional
indebtedness, encumber its assets, sell its assets and make
59
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
certain payments, including amounts for share repurchases and
dividends. The Companys facility and promissory notes are
secured by the stock of the Companys major subsidiaries.
The facility requires that LII annually and quarterly deliver
financial statements, as well as compliance certificates, to the
banks within specified time periods.
On September 7, 2005, the Company called for redemption all
of its outstanding 6.25% convertible subordinated notes
(Convertible Notes) on October 7, 2005. The
redemption price was 103.571% of the principal amount. As of
September 7, 2005, there was $143.75 million aggregate
principal amount of Convertible Notes outstanding, which could
be converted into the Companys common stock at a rate of
55.2868 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount
of Convertible Notes at any time before the close of business on
the business day prior to the redemption date. As of
October 6, 2005, the holders of all of the Convertible
Notes had converted the Convertible Notes into an aggregate of
approximately 7.9 million shares of common stock.
LIIs domestic revolving and term loans contain certain
financial covenant restrictions. As of December 31, 2005,
LII was in compliance with all covenant requirements. LII
periodically reviews its capital structure, including its
primary bank facility, to ensure that it has adequate liquidity.
LII believes that cash flow from operations, as well as
available borrowings under its revolving credit facility and
other sources of funding will be sufficient to fund its
operations for the foreseeable future.
Under a revolving period asset securitization arrangement, the
Company transfers beneficial interests in a portion of its trade
accounts receivable to a third party in exchange for cash. The
Companys continued involvement in the transferred assets
is limited to servicing. These transfers are accounted for as
sales rather than secured borrowing. The fair values assigned to
the retained and transferred interests are based primarily on
the receivables carrying value given the short term to maturity
and low credit risk. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, the
Company had not sold any beneficial interests in accounts
receivable. The discount incurred in the sale of such
receivables of $0.9 million, $2.3 million and
$2.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2005,
2004 and 2003, respectively, is included as part of Selling,
General and Administrative Expense in the accompanying
Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The income tax provision from continuing operations consisted of
the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$ |
63.9 |
|
|
$ |
12.9 |
|
|
$ |
32.8 |
|
|
State
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
Foreign
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current
|
|
|
85.4 |
|
|
|
26.4 |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
State
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
(7.1 |
) |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax provision
|
|
$ |
83.0 |
|
|
$ |
30.5 |
|
|
$ |
45.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and
cumulative effect of accounting change was comprised of
$195.3 million domestic and $39.7 million foreign for
the year ended December 31, 2005, $(92.4) million
domestic and $29.4 million foreign for the year ended
December 31, 2004 and $112.0 million domestic and
$19.8 million foreign for the year ended December 31,
2003.
The difference between the income tax provision from continuing
operations computed at the statutory federal income tax rate and
the financial statement provision for taxes is summarized as
follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Provision (benefit) at the U.S. statutory rate of 35%
|
|
$ |
82.3 |
|
|
$ |
(22.1 |
) |
|
$ |
46.1 |
|
Increase (reduction) in tax expense resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State income tax, net of federal income tax benefit
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
Foreign losses not providing a current benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other permanent items
|
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
Research tax credit
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
Foreign taxes at rates other than 35% and miscellaneous other
|
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax provision
|
|
$ |
83.0 |
|
|
$ |
30.5 |
|
|
$ |
45.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes reflect the tax consequences on future
years of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets
and liabilities and their financial reporting basis and are
reflected as current or non-current depending on the timing of
the expected realization. The deferred tax provision for the
periods shown represents the effect of changes in the amounts of
temporary differences during those periods.
61
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Deferred tax assets (liabilities), as determined under the
provisions of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes, were comprised of the following at
December 31 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Gross deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranties
|
|
$ |
28.0 |
|
|
$ |
24.1 |
|
|
Net operating losses (foreign and U.S. state)
|
|
|
59.5 |
|
|
|
58.6 |
|
|
Postretirement and pension benefits
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
24.2 |
|
|
Inventory reserves
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
Receivable allowance
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
Compensation liabilities
|
|
|
26.3 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
Deferred income
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
18.7 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
170.1 |
|
|
|
168.7 |
|
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(50.5 |
) |
|
|
(43.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance
|
|
|
119.6 |
|
|
|
125.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(10.8 |
) |
|
|
(12.7 |
) |
|
Insurance liabilities
|
|
|
(8.0 |
) |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
Other
|
|
|
(8.6 |
) |
|
|
(12.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(27.4 |
) |
|
|
(29.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
$ |
92.2 |
|
|
$ |
95.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2005, the Company has $15.8 million
and $43.7 million in state and foreign net operating loss
carryforwards, respectively. The state and foreign net operating
loss carryforwards begin expiring in 2006 and 2007,
respectively. The deferred tax asset valuation allowance relates
primarily to the operating loss carry forwards in various states
in the U.S., European and Canadian tax jurisdictions. The
increase in valuation allowance is primarily the result of
foreign and state losses not benefited.
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets,
management considers whether it is more likely than not that
some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be
realized. In order to fully realize the deferred tax asset, the
Company will need to generate future federal and foreign taxable
income of approximately $69.0 million during the periods in
which those temporary differences become deductible and future
state taxable income of approximately $151.7 million prior
to the expiration of the net operating loss carry forwards.
U.S. taxable income for the years ended December 31,
2005, 2004 and 2003 was $148.8 million, $2.4 million
and $86.4 million, respectively. Management considers the
reversal of existing taxable temporary differences, projected
future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making
this assessment. Based upon the level of historical taxable
income and projections for future taxable income over the
periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible,
management believes it is more likely than not that the Company
will realize the benefits of these deductible differences, net
of the existing valuation allowances at December 31, 2005.
No provision has been made for income taxes which may become
payable upon distribution of the Companys foreign
subsidiaries earnings. It is not practicable to estimate
the amount of tax that might be payable, since managements
intent is to permanently reinvest these earnings or to
repatriate earnings when it is tax effective to do so.
62
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The American Jobs Creation Act (AJCA) was signed
into law on October 22, 2004. The AJCA provided an
opportunity to repatriate foreign earnings and claim an 85%
dividend received deduction against the repatriated amount. The
Company evaluated the potential effects of repatriation and
determined not to repatriate earnings under this provision.
|
|
10. |
Current Accrued Expenses: |
Significant components of current accrued expenses are as
follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Accrued wages
|
|
$ |
114.6 |
|
|
$ |
85.5 |
|
Casualty insurance reserves
|
|
|
61.3 |
|
|
|
58.3 |
|
Deferred income on service contracts
|
|
|
32.8 |
|
|
|
29.3 |
|
Accrued warranties
|
|
|
25.3 |
|
|
|
26.8 |
|
Accrued promotions
|
|
|
31.5 |
|
|
|
26.1 |
|
Other
|
|
|
56.2 |
|
|
|
60.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current accrued expenses
|
|
$ |
321.7 |
|
|
$ |
286.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. |
Employee Benefit Plans: |
The Company maintains noncontributory profit sharing plans for
its eligible domestic salaried employees. These plans are
discretionary, as the Companys contributions are
determined annually by the Board of Directors. Provisions for
contributions to the plans amounted to $14.0 million,
$10.4 million and $8.5 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003,
respectively. The Company also sponsors several 401(k) plans
with employer contribution-matching requirements. The Company
contributed $1.6 million, $2.3 million and
$2.5 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, to these
401(k) plans.
|
|
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan |
The Companys employee stock purchase plan, which was
terminated as of December 31, 2003, had
2,575,000 shares of common stock reserved. The shares were
offered for sale to employees only, through payroll deductions,
at prices equal to 85% of the lesser of the fair market value of
the Companys common stock on the first day of the offering
period or the last day of the offering period. Under the plan,
participating employees purchased 508,380 shares in 2003.
|
|
|
Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plans |
The Company has domestic and foreign pension plans covering
essentially all employees. The Company also maintains an
unfunded postretirement benefit plan, which provides certain
medical and life insurance benefits to eligible employees. The
pension plans are accounted for under provisions of
SFAS No. 87, Employers Accounting for
Pensions. The postretirement benefit plan is accounted for
under the provisions of SFAS No. 106,
Employers Accounting for Postretirement Benefits
Other than Pensions (FAS 106).
63
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following tables set forth amounts recognized in the
Companys financial statements and the plans funded
status (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits | |
|
Other Benefits | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
$ |
262.5 |
|
|
$ |
234.6 |
|
|
$ |
N/A |
|
|
$ |
N/A |
|
Changes in projected benefit obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
|
|
243.1 |
|
|
|
224.1 |
|
|
|
28.3 |
|
|
|
24.3 |
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
Plan participants contributions
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
Amendments
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(13.1 |
) |
|
|
(14.1 |
) |
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
|
269.7 |
|
|
|
243.1 |
|
|
|
27.1 |
|
|
|
28.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
|
|
$ |
167.2 |
|
|
$ |
161.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employer contribution
|
|
|
29.8 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
Plan participants contributions
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
Foreign currency changes
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(10.4 |
) |
|
|
(9.9 |
) |
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
|
|
|
200.1 |
|
|
|
167.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
|
(69.6 |
) |
|
|
(75.9 |
) |
|
|
(27.1 |
) |
|
|
(28.3 |
) |
|
Unrecognized actuarial loss
|
|
|
102.1 |
|
|
|
87.5 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
Unamortized prior service cost
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
|
Unrecognized net obligation
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized
|
|
$ |
44.0 |
|
|
$ |
22.5 |
|
|
$ |
(16.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(15.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid benefit cost
|
|
$ |
63.1 |
|
|
$ |
40.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Accrued benefit liability
|
|
|
(81.4 |
) |
|
|
(106.7 |
) |
|
|
(16.5 |
) |
|
|
(15.7 |
) |
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
52.2 |
|
|
|
77.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized
|
|
$ |
44.0 |
|
|
$ |
22.5 |
|
|
$ |
(16.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(15.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in
excess of plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation
|
|
$ |
158.2 |
|
|
$ |
243.1 |
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
|
152.0 |
|
|
|
234.6 |
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
88.5 |
|
|
|
167.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits | |
|
Other Benefits | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$ |
7.0 |
|
|
$ |
6.6 |
|
|
$ |
5.4 |
|
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(13.7 |
) |
|
|
(14.5 |
) |
|
|
(14.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
Recognized actuarial loss
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
Recognized transition obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$ |
11.0 |
|
|
$ |
10.0 |
|
|
$ |
5.7 |
|
|
$ |
3.3 |
|
|
$ |
2.6 |
|
|
$ |
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other | |
|
|
Pension Benefits | |
|
Benefits | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit
obligations at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.75 |
% |
|
|
5.75 |
% |
|
|
5.75 |
% |
|
|
5.75 |
% |
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
4.28 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits | |
|
Other Benefits | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic
benefit cost for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.75 |
% |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
6.75 |
% |
|
|
5.75 |
% |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
6.75 |
% |
Expected long-term return on plan assets
|
|
|
8.25 |
|
|
|
8.75 |
|
|
|
8.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To develop the expected long-term rate of return on assets
assumption, the Company considered the historical returns and
the future expectations for returns for each asset category, as
well as the target asset allocation of the pension portfolio and
the effect of periodic rebalancing. These results were adjusted
for the payment of reasonable expenses of the plan from plan
assets. This resulted in the selection of the 8.25% long-term
rate of return on assets assumption.
To select a discount rate for the purpose of valuing the plan
obligations, the Company performed an analysis in which the
duration of projected cash flows from defined benefit and
retiree health care plans were matched with a yield curve based
on the appropriate universe of high-quality corporate bonds that
were available. The Company used the results of the yield curve
analysis to select the discount rate that matched
65
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
the duration and payment stream of the benefits in each plan.
The rate was rounded to the nearest quarter of a percent. This
resulted in the selection of the 5.75% discount rate assumption.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Assumed health care cost trend rates at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
Rate to which the cost rate is assumed to decline (the ultimate
trend rate)
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect
on the amounts reported for the health care plan. A one
percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates
would have the following effects (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-Percentage- | |
|
1-Percentage- | |
|
|
Point Increase | |
|
Point Decrease | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Effect on total of service and interest cost
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
Effect on the post-retirement benefit obligation
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
The Companys
U.S.-based pension plan
weighted-average asset allocations at December 31, 2005 and
2004, by asset category, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Assets at | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
Asset Category |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Domestic equity
|
|
|
47.6 |
% |
|
|
56.9 |
% |
International equity
|
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
10.8 |
% |
Investment Grade Bonds
|
|
|
26.4 |
% |
|
|
28.5 |
% |
Money Market/ Cash/ Annuities
|
|
|
17.1 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target | |
|
+/- | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Plan investments are invested within the following range
targets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic equity
|
|
|
55 |
% |
|
|
+/-3% |
|
International equity
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
+/-3% |
|
Investment grade bonds
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
+/-3% |
|
Money market/cash
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
+1%/-4% |
|
The weighted-average asset allocations for the Companys
U.S.-based pension plan
as of December 31, 2005 is not consistent with the
Companys target allocations. This is due primarily to the
fact that in late December 2005, the Company funded
contributions of $19.9 million to the
U.S.-based pension plan
and this amount was included in the money market and cash asset
category as of December 31, 2005.
The plans investment advisors have discretion within the
above ranges. Investments are rebalanced based upon guidelines
developed by the Company with input from their consultants and
investment advisers. Additional contributions are invested under
the same guidelines and may be used to rebalance the portfolio.
The investment allocation and individual investments are chosen
with regard to the duration of the obligations under the plan.
The Company estimates its 2006 minimum required contribution
will be $5.8 million to its pension plans. The Company will
evaluate additional voluntary pension contributions throughout
2006; however, no voluntary contributions for 2006 are planned
at this time. The Company estimates its 2006 contribution to its
postretirement benefit plan to be approximately
$1.6 million. Included in total plan assets
66
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
above are approximately $25.3 million of assets related to
foreign plans with a weighted-average expected rate of return of
7%.
Expected future benefit payments are shown in the table below
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2009 | |
|
2010 | |
|
2011-2015 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Pension benefits
|
|
$ |
15.5 |
|
|
$ |
17.6 |
|
|
$ |
17.5 |
|
|
$ |
15.7 |
|
|
$ |
15.6 |
|
|
$ |
90.7 |
|
Other benefits
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
12. Stock-Based Compensation
Plans:
Under the Companys Amended and Restated 1998 Incentive
Plan (the 1998 Incentive Plan), the Company is
authorized to issue awards for 24,254,706 shares of common
stock. As of December 31, 2005, awards for
20,272,303 shares of common stock had been granted and
3,873,121 shares had been cancelled or repurchased under
the 1998 Incentive Plan. Consequently, as of December 31,
2005, there were 7,855,524 shares available for future
issuance.
The 1998 Incentive Plan provides for various long-term incentive
and retentive awards, which include stock options, performance
shares, restricted stock awards and stock appreciation rights. A
description of these long-term incentive and retentive awards
and related activity within each is provided below.
Under the 1998 Incentive Plan, the exercise price for stock
options equals the stocks fair value on the date of grant.
Options granted prior to 1998 vested on the date of grant.
Options granted in 1998 and after vest over three years.
Options issued prior to December 2000 expire after
ten years and options issued in December 2000 and after
expire after seven years.
In addition to the options discussed above, there were 147,775
stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2005 that were
issued in connection with the acquisition of Service Experts
Inc. All such options are fully vested.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, and in
accordance with APB No. 25, no stock-based compensation
cost was reflected in net income for grants of stock options to
employees because the Company grants stock options with an
exercise price equal to the fair market value of the stock on
the date of grant. For footnote disclosures under
SFAS No. 123, the fair value of each option award was
estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes-Merton
option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted below.
Estimates of fair value are not intended to predict actual
future events or the value ultimately realized by employees who
receive equity awards. Subsequent events are not indicative of
the reasonableness of the original estimates made by the
Company. Under SFAS No. 123, the Company used
historical data to estimate the expected volatility for the term
of new options and the outstanding period of the option for
separate groups of employees that had similar historical
exercise behavior. The risk free interest rate was based on the
U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.
No stock options were granted from July 1, 2005, the date
the Company adopted SFAS No. 123R, through
December 31, 2005. For future stock options grants, the
fair value of each stock option award will be estimated using
the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model and will follow the
provisions of SFAS No. 123R and SAB No. 107.
The Company will use historical data and other pertinent
information to estimate the expected volatility for the term of
new options and the outstanding period of the option for
separate groups of employees that had similar historical
exercise behavior. The risk free interest rate will be based on
the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of
grant.
67
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, the fair value
of an option was amortized to expense in the pro forma footnote
disclosure using the graded method. Upon the adoption of
SFAS No. 123R, options granted prior to the date of
adoption continue to be amortized to expense using the graded
method. For options granted after the date of adoption, the fair
value is amortized to expense ratably over the vesting period.
A summary of stock option activity for the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, follows (in
millions, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
|
Exercise | |
|
|
|
Exercise | |
|
|
|
Exercise | |
|
|
|
|
Price per | |
|
|
|
Price per | |
|
|
|
Price per | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Share | |
|
Shares | |
|
Share | |
|
Shares | |
|
Share | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Outstanding at beginning of year
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
$ |
14.00 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
$ |
13.09 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
$ |
13.03 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.57 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
18.91 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
17.00 |
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
12.52 |
|
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
10.37 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
10.70 |
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
16.38 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
16.56 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
19.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of year
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
$ |
14.81 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
$ |
14.00 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
$ |
13.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at end of year
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
$ |
14.58 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
$ |
13.70 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
$ |
12.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of options granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes information about stock options
outstanding as of December 31, 2005 (in millions, except
per share data and years):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding | |
|
Options Exercisable | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted- | |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
Weighted- | |
|
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
Weighted- | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining | |
|
Average | |
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining | |
|
Average | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual | |
|
Exercise | |
|
Aggregate | |
|
|
|
Contractual | |
|
Exercise | |
|
Aggregate | |
Range of Exercise |
|
Number | |
|
Term | |
|
Price | |
|
Intrinsic | |
|
Number | |
|
Life | |
|
Price | |
|
Intrinsic | |
Prices Per Share |
|
Outstanding | |
|
(in years) | |
|
Per Share | |
|
Value | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
(in years) | |
|
Per Share | |
|
Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
$7.28 - $49.63
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
3.24 |
|
|
$ |
14.81 |
|
|
$ |
72.4 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
3.09 |
|
|
$ |
14.58 |
|
|
$ |
69.5 |
|
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of
grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model with
the following weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
2.13 |
% |
|
|
2.13 |
% |
|
|
2.24 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.33 |
% |
|
|
4.23 |
% |
|
|
3.75 |
% |
Expected volatility
|
|
|
40.0 |
% |
|
|
40.0 |
% |
|
|
40.0 |
% |
Expected life (in years)
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
As of December 31, 2005, there was approximately
$1.1 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to
nonvested options. Such cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 1.9 years. The Companys
estimated forfeiture rate for stock options was 5% as of
December 31, 2005. Total compensation expense for stock
options was $1.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2005.
68
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The total intrinsic value of options exercised and the resulting
tax deductions to realize tax benefits were as follows (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Intrinsic Value of Options Exercised
|
|
$ |
23.6 |
|
|
$ |
12.8 |
|
|
$ |
3.5 |
|
Realized Tax Benefits from Tax Deductions
|
|
$ |
8.8 |
|
|
$ |
4.8 |
|
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
The Companys practice is to issue new shares of common
stock to satisfy stock option exercises. Excess tax benefits
disclosed in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows have been reduced by the hypothetical deferred tax asset
that would have existed under SFAS No. 123 for these awards.
Under the 1998 Incentive Plan, performance shares are awarded
(the Fixed Performance Awards) to certain employees
at the discretion of the Board of Directors as of the beginning
of each fiscal year. Awards granted prior to 2003 vest after ten
years of employment (the Vesting Period). Fixed
Performance Awards are converted to an equal number of shares of
the Companys common stock. If pre-defined performance
measures are met by the Company over a three-year period, the
Vesting Period is accelerated from ten years to three years for
25% to 100% of the Fixed Performance Awards, depending on the
Companys performance. Eligible participants may also earn
additional shares of the Companys common stock. The number
of additional shares can range from 0% to 100% of the awards
granted, depending on the Companys performance over a
three-year period.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, and in
accordance with APB No. 25, compensation expense was
measured based on the market price of the Companys common
stock on the date of grant and recognized over the performance
period. Compensation expense on the additional shares was
measured by applying the market price of the Companys
stock at the end of the period to the number of additional
shares that were expected to be earned. Such expense was
recognized over the performance period.
Beginning in 2003, the Company changed the vesting of Fixed
Performance Awards such that the awards vest if, at the end of
the performance period, at least the minimum performance level
has been attained. To the extent that the award payout level
attained is less than 100%, the difference between 100% and the
award distributed will be forfeited. Compensation expense was
measured by applying the market price of the Companys
stock at the end of the period to the number of awards expected
to be earned.
Upon the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, all of the
performance share plans under the 1998 Incentive Plan were
classified as equity based plans and the fair value of each
award is the market price of the stock on the date of grant and
is amortized to expense ratably over the vesting period. The
stock-based compensation expense for any additional shares which
may be earned is estimated on the grant date based on the market
price of the stock at the date of grant. The number of shares
expected to be earned will be adjusted, as necessary, to reflect
the actual number of shares awarded.
The weighted-average fair value of performance share awards
granted during the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and
2003 was $29.36, $19.34 and $16.76, respectively.
69
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A summary of the status of the Companys nonvested
performance share awards as of December 31, 2005 and
changes during the year ended December 31, 2005 is
presented below (in millions, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted- | |
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
|
Grant Date | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Nonvested performance share awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
$ |
14.84 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
29.36 |
|
Vested
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
$ |
16.21 |
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
$ |
13.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
$ |
16.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2005, there was approximately
$22.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to nonvested performance share awards. Such cost is
expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of
2.4 years. The Companys estimated forfeiture rate for
performance shares was 12% as of December 31, 2005. Total
compensation expense for performance share awards was
$19.6 million, $8.0 million and $4.4 million for
the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003,
respectively. The Companys practice is to issue new shares
of common stock to satisfy performance share award vestings.
Under the 1998 Incentive Plan, restricted stock awards are
issued to attract and retain key Company executives. At the end
of a three-year retention period, the award will vest and be
distributed to the participant provided that the participant has
been an employee of the Company or one of its wholly owned
subsidiaries continuously throughout the retention period. Under
APB No. 25, compensation expense was measured based on the
market price of the Companys common stock at the date of
grant and was recognized on a straight-line basis over the
performance period.
Upon the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, all restricted
stock plans under the 1998 Incentive Plan were classified as
equity based plans and the fair value of each award is the
market price of the Companys common stock on the date of
grant and amortized to expense ratably over the vesting period.
The weighted-average fair value of restricted stock awards
granted during the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and
2003 was $28.76, $19.25 and $15.81, respectively.
70
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A summary of the status of the Companys nonvested
restricted stock awards as of December 31, 2005 and changes
during the year ended December 31, 2005 is presented below
(in millions, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted- | |
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
|
Grant Date | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Nonvested restricted stock awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
$ |
17.69 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
28.76 |
|
Vested
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
$ |
16.26 |
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
16.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
21.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2005, there was approximately
$13.1 million of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to nonvested restricted stock awards. Such cost is
expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of
2.2 years. The Companys estimated forfeiture rate for
restricted stock awards was 12% as of December 31, 2005.
Total compensation expense for restricted stock awards was
$5.3 million, $1.8 million and $1.7 million for
the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003,
respectively.
The total fair value of restricted stock awards vested and the
resulting tax deductions to realize tax benefits were as follows
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended |
|
|
December 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Fair Value of Restricted Stock Awards Vested
|
|
$ |
5.8 |
|
|
$ |
5.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Realized Tax Benefits from Tax Deductions
|
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
The Companys practice is to issue new shares of common
stock to satisfy restricted stock award vestings. Excess tax
benefits disclosed in the accompanying Consolidated Statements
of Cash Flows have been reduced by the hypothetical deferred tax
asset that would have existed under SFAS No. 123 for these
awards.
|
|
|
Stock Appreciation Rights |
In 2003, the Company began awarding stock appreciation rights.
Each recipient is given the right to receive a value
equal to the future appreciation of the Companys stock
price. The value is paid in Company stock. Stock appreciation
rights vest in one-third increments beginning with the first
anniversary date after the grant date.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, compensation
expense was measured by applying the increase in the market
price of the Companys stock at the end of the period to
the number of awards.
Upon the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, the compensation
expense for awards granted prior to the adoption is the fair
value on the date of grant, recognized over the vesting period.
The fair value for these awards was estimated using the
Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model and follows the provisions
of SFAS No. 123R and SAB No. 107. The
Company used historical data and other pertinent information to
estimate the expected volatility for the term of the award and
the outstanding period of the award for separate groups of
employees that had similar historical exercise behavior. The
risk free interest rate was based on the U.S. Treasury
yield curve in effect at the time of grant.
71
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The weighted-average fair value of stock appreciation rights
granted during the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and
2003 was $8.65, $6.81 and $6.23, respectively.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, the fair value
of a stock appreciation right was amortized to expense using the
graded method. Upon the adoption of SFAS No. 123R,
stock appreciation rights granted prior to the date of adoption
continue to be amortized to expense using the graded method. For
stock appreciation rights granted after the date of adoption,
the fair value is amortized to expense ratably over the vesting
period.
A summary of stock appreciation rights activity for the year
ended December 31, 2005 follows (in millions, except per
share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted- | |
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
|
Exercise | |
|
|
|
|
Price Per | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Share | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Outstanding at beginning of year
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
16.82 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
29.36 |
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
16.76 |
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
16.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of year
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
22.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at end of year
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
16.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes information about stock
appreciation rights outstanding as of December 31, 2005 (in
millions, except per share data and years):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Appreciation Rights Outstanding | |
|
Stock Appreciation Rights Exercisable | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted- | |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining | |
|
Weighted- | |
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining | |
|
Weighted- | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual | |
|
Average | |
|
Aggregate | |
|
|
|
Contractual | |
|
Average | |
|
Aggregate | |
Range of Exercise |
|
Number | |
|
Term | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
Intrinsic | |
|
Number | |
|
Life | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
Intrinsic | |
Prices Per Share |
|
Outstanding | |
|
(in years) | |
|
Per Share | |
|
Value | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
(in years) | |
|
Per Share | |
|
Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
$16.43 $29.36
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
5.81 |
|
|
$ |
22.22 |
|
|
$ |
8.8 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
4.95 |
|
|
$ |
16.83 |
|
|
$ |
6.2 |
|
The fair value of each stock appreciation right granted after
June 30, 2005 through December 31, 2005 is estimated
on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton option
pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
1.50 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.39 |
% |
Expected volatility
|
|
|
31.90 |
% |
Expected life (in years)
|
|
|
4.53 |
|
As of December 31, 2005, there was approximately
$4.9 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to
nonvested stock appreciation rights. Such cost is expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.1 years. The
Companys estimated forfeiture rate for stock appreciation
rights was 9% as of December 31, 2005. Total compensation
expense (income) for stock appreciation rights was
$2.6 million,
72
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
$2.1 million and $0 for the years ended December 31,
2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The Companys practice
is to issue new shares of common stock to satisfy stock
appreciation rights exercises.
|
|
13. |
Commitments and Contingencies: |
The Company has various leases relating principally to the use
of operating facilities. Rent expense for 2005, 2004 and 2003
was approximately $52.9 million, $55.3 million and
$55.9 million, respectively. Leases with step rent
provisions and escalation clauses are accounted for on a
straight-line basis.
Minimum lease payments that are dependent on an existing index
or rate, such as the consumer price index or prime interest
rate, are included based on the index or rate existing at the
inception of the lease and are adjusted for subsequent changes
in the index or rate as they occur.
The approximate minimum commitments under all non-cancelable
leases at December 31, 2005 are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
$ |
44.4 |
|
2007
|
|
|
32.6 |
|
2008
|
|
|
24.5 |
|
2009
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
2010
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
53.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
183.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company is involved in various claims and lawsuits
incidental to its business. In addition, the Company and its
subsidiary Heatcraft Inc. have been named in four lawsuits in
connection with its former heat transfer operations. The
lawsuits allege personal injury resulting from alleged emissions
of trichloroethylene, dichloroethylene, and vinyl chloride and
other unspecified emissions from the South Plant in Grenada,
Mississippi, previously owned by Heatcraft Inc. The Mississippi
Supreme Court has ordered that these four lawsuits be severed
and transferred to Grenada County. This will require
plaintiffs counsel to maintain a separate lawsuit for each
of the approximately 112 original plaintiffs. Since the court
order, there has been no action taken towards instigating the
individual lawsuits. It is not possible to predict with
certainty the outcome of these matters or an estimate of any
potential loss. Based on present knowledge, management believes
that it is unlikely that any final resolution of these matters
will result in a material liability for the Company.
In March 2004, the Company announced that the Audit Committee of
the Companys Board of Directors initiated an independent
inquiry into certain accounting matters related to the
Companys Canadian service centers in its Service Experts
segment. Immediately prior to such announcement, the Company
contacted the Fort Worth office of the SEC to inform them
of the existence and details of such allegations and the related
independent inquiry. Independent counsel for the Audit Committee
communicated the results of the independent inquiry to the SEC.
On January 31, 2005, the Company announced the SEC
investigation was converted to a formal status and the Company
continues to fully cooperate with the SEC by producing
information and documentation in response to requests from the
SEC. The Company is unable to predict the ultimate outcome of
this matter.
73
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing net income by
the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during
the period. Diluted earnings per share are computed by dividing
net income, adjusted for the interest expense and amortization
of deferred financing costs associated with the Companys
convertible notes by the sum of the weighted average number of
shares and the number of equivalent shares assumed outstanding,
if dilutive, under the Companys stock based compensation
plans and convertible notes. Emerging Issues Task Force
Issue 04-8,
The Effect of Contingently Convertible Debt on Diluted
Earnings per Share requires that contingently convertible
debt securities with a market price trigger be included in
diluted earnings per share, if they are dilutive, regardless of
whether the market price trigger has been met. As of
December 31, 2005, the Company had 74,671,494 shares
outstanding of which 3,635,947 were held as treasury shares.
Diluted earnings per share are computed as follows (in millions,
except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
150.7 |
|
|
$ |
(134.4 |
) |
|
$ |
86.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add: after-tax interest expense and amortization of deferred
financing costs on the Convertible Notes
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) as adjusted
|
|
$ |
155.3 |
|
|
$ |
(134.4 |
) |
|
$ |
92.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
64.2 |
|
|
|
60.0 |
|
|
|
58.4 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities attributable to convertible notes
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
Effect of diluted securities attributable to stock options and
performance share awards
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding, as adjusted
|
|
|
73.7 |
|
|
|
60.0 |
|
|
|
68.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$ |
2.11 |
|
|
$ |
(2.24 |
) |
|
$ |
1.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additionally, options to purchase 111,064 shares of
common stock at prices ranging from $24.91 to $49.63 per
share, options to purchase 1,399,386 shares of common
stock at prices ranging from $17.82 to $49.63 per share and
options to purchase 2,699,089 shares of common stock
at prices ranging from $15.59 to $49.63 per share were
outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and
2003, respectively, but were not included in the diluted
earnings per share calculation because the assumed exercise of
such options would have been anti-dilutive. Similarly, for the
year ended December 31, 2004, all potentially dilutive
securities, including 7,947,458 shares attributable to
convertible notes, were excluded because their effects were
anti-dilutive for that period.
|
|
15. |
Quarterly Financial Information (unaudited): |
In connection with the completion of year-end procedures related
to the accounting for futures contracts for copper and aluminum,
the Company determined that these futures contracts, previously
designated as cash flow hedges, did not qualify for hedge
accounting under SFAS No. 133, as the Companys
documentation did not meet the criteria specified by
SFAS No. 133 in order for the hedging instruments to
qualify for cash flow designation.
As a result, the Company recorded an unrealized gain of
$23.3 million to (Gains), Losses and Other Expenses, net
for the year ended December 31, 2005 in the accompanying
Consolidated Statements of Operations. This resulted in an
increase in net income of $6.1 million, or $0.08 per
share, in the first quarter 2005, which included
$6.4 million of net income impact related to open futures
contracts as of December 31, 2004. Additionally, this
resulted in a decrease in net income of $3.5 million, or
$0.05 per share, in the second
74
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
quarter 2005; and an increase in net income of
$6.3 million, or $0.09 per share, in the third
quarter, by releasing amounts previously recorded in the
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) component of
Stockholders Equity. The cumulative impact to previously
reported earnings for the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2005 is an increase of $8.9 million. A
positive impact to net income of $6.0 million, or
$0.08 per share, also resulted in the fourth quarter 2005.
During 2005, the Company realized pre-tax gains of
$16.7 million related to futures contracts that settled
during the year. Of these gains, $8.8 million was
previously included in Cost of Goods Sold for the nine-month
period ended September 30, 2005 and should have been
included in (Gains), Losses and Other Expenses, net in the
accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. The amounts
that had been included in Cost of Goods Sold were
$2.0 million, $2.8 million, and $4.0 million for
the first, second, and third quarters of 2005, respectively, and
had no impact on previously reported net income. For the fourth
quarter of 2005, an $8.0 million gain was recorded in
Gains, Losses and Other Expenses, net.
These adjustments do not affect the Companys cash flows
and, the impact on prior years results was not material.
The quarterly information presented below for the first, second
and third quarters of 2005 has been restated and reflects the
impact of the adjustments discussed above.
The following provides the impact on previously reported amounts
within the Companys consolidated statements of operations
for the first, second and third quarters of 2005 related to the
Companys accounting for forward purchase contracts for
copper and aluminum. Amounts are in millions and items in
parenthesis represent a decrease from the amounts previously
reported.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Increase (Decrease) | |
Cost of goods sold
|
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
|
$ |
2.8 |
|
|
$ |
4.0 |
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
Realized gains on settled futures contracts previously included
in cost of goods sold
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on open futures contracts previously
included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gains), losses and other expenses, net
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
|
14.0 |
|
Operational income from continuing operations
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
|
|
10.0 |
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and
cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
|
|
10.0 |
|
Provision for income taxes previously included in accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
3.7 |
|
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
6.3 |
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
6.3 |
|
Net income and retained earnings
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
6.3 |
|
75
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005
(Unaudited, in millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the | |
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Previously | |
|
|
|
|
Reported | |
|
Restated | |
NET SALES
|
|
$ |
700.3 |
|
|
$ |
700.3 |
|
COST OF GOODS SOLD
|
|
|
478.5 |
|
|
|
480.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
221.8 |
|
|
|
219.8 |
|
OPERATING EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
204.3 |
|
|
|
204.3 |
|
|
(Gains), losses and other expenses, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operational income from continuing operations
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
27.0 |
|
INTEREST EXPENSE, net
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
OTHER EXPENSE
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
21.4 |
|
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations of discontinued operations
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
6.4 |
|
|
$ |
12.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME PER SHARE FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
LOSS PER SHARE FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
NET INCOME PER SHARE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
61.5 |
|
|
|
61.5 |
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
72.4 |
|
|
|
72.4 |
|
CASH DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER SHARE
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
76
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Three Months and Six Months Ended June 30,
2005
(Unaudited, in millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the | |
|
For the | |
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Six Months Ended | |
|
|
June 30, 2005 | |
|
June 30, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Previously | |
|
|
|
Previously | |
|
|
|
|
Reported | |
|
Restated | |
|
Reported | |
|
Restated | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
NET SALES
|
|
$ |
867.8 |
|
|
$ |
867.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,568.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,568.1 |
|
COST OF GOODS SOLD
|
|
|
573.8 |
|
|
|
576.6 |
|
|
|
1,052.3 |
|
|
|
1,057.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
294.0 |
|
|
|
291.2 |
|
|
|
515.8 |
|
|
|
511.0 |
|
OPERATING EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
224.9 |
|
|
|
224.9 |
|
|
|
429.2 |
|
|
|
429.2 |
|
|
(Gains), losses and other expenses, net
|
|
|
(8.7 |
) |
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
|
|
(8.7 |
) |
|
|
(17.5 |
) |
|
Restructuring charge
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operational income from continuing operations
|
|
|
75.6 |
|
|
|
70.1 |
|
|
|
93.1 |
|
|
|
97.1 |
|
INTEREST EXPENSE, net
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
OTHER INCOME
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
71.6 |
|
|
|
66.1 |
|
|
|
83.5 |
|
|
|
87.5 |
|
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
26.6 |
|
|
|
24.6 |
|
|
|
31.0 |
|
|
|
32.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
45.0 |
|
|
|
41.5 |
|
|
|
52.5 |
|
|
|
55.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations of discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
44.8 |
|
|
$ |
41.3 |
|
|
$ |
51.2 |
|
|
$ |
53.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME PER SHARE FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.73 |
|
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
|
$ |
0.89 |
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.77 |
|
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
LOSS PER SHARE FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
NET INCOME PER SHARE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
$ |
0.83 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
62.0 |
|
|
|
62.0 |
|
|
|
61.7 |
|
|
|
61.7 |
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
72.8 |
|
|
|
72.8 |
|
|
|
72.5 |
|
|
|
72.5 |
|
CASH DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER SHARE
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
77
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Three Months and Nine Months Ended September 30,
2005
(Unaudited, in millions, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the | |
|
For the | |
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, 2005 | |
|
September 30, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Previously | |
|
|
|
Previously | |
|
|
|
|
Reported | |
|
Restated | |
|
Reported | |
|
Restated | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
NET SALES
|
|
$ |
927.5 |
|
|
$ |
927.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,495.6 |
|
|
$ |
2,495.6 |
|
COST OF GOODS SOLD
|
|
|
612.1 |
|
|
|
616.1 |
|
|
|
1,664.4 |
|
|
|
1,673.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
315.4 |
|
|
|
311.4 |
|
|
|
831.2 |
|
|
|
822.4 |
|
OPERATING EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
230.2 |
|
|
|
230.2 |
|
|
|
659.4 |
|
|
|
659.4 |
|
|
(Gains), losses and other expenses, net
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(13.9 |
) |
|
|
(8.6 |
) |
|
|
(31.4 |
) |
|
Restructuring charge
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operational income from continuing operations
|
|
|
84.9 |
|
|
|
94.9 |
|
|
|
178.0 |
|
|
|
192.0 |
|
INTEREST EXPENSE, net
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
OTHER EXPENSE
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and
cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
77.1 |
|
|
|
87.1 |
|
|
|
160.6 |
|
|
|
174.6 |
|
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
28.5 |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
|
59.5 |
|
|
|
64.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
|
48.6 |
|
|
|
54.9 |
|
|
|
101.1 |
|
|
|
110.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF ACCOUNTING CHANGE, NET
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
48.8 |
|
|
|
55.1 |
|
|
|
101.3 |
|
|
|
110.2 |
|
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations of discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
48.8 |
|
|
$ |
55.1 |
|
|
$ |
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
108.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME PER SHARE FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE CUMULATIVE
EFFECT OF ACCOUNTING CHANGE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.77 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
$ |
1.63 |
|
|
$ |
1.77 |
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
1.45 |
|
|
$ |
1.57 |
|
CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF ACCOUNTING CHANGE PER SHARE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
INCOME PER SHARE FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.77 |
|
|
$ |
0.88 |
|
|
$ |
1.63 |
|
|
$ |
1.77 |
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
1.45 |
|
|
$ |
1.57 |
|
LOSS PER SHARE FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
NET INCOME PER SHARE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.77 |
|
|
$ |
0.88 |
|
|
$ |
1.61 |
|
|
$ |
1.75 |
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
1.43 |
|
|
$ |
1.55 |
|
AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
62.9 |
|
|
|
62.9 |
|
|
|
62.1 |
|
|
|
62.1 |
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
74.2 |
|
|
|
74.2 |
|
|
|
73.1 |
|
|
|
73.1 |
|
CASH DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER SHARE:
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
78
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SEGMENT REVENUES AND OPERATING PROFIT
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005
(Unaudited, in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the | |
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Previously | |
|
|
|
|
Reported | |
|
Restated | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Net Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
$ |
342.7 |
|
|
$ |
342.7 |
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
126.2 |
|
|
|
126.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heating and Cooling
|
|
|
468.9 |
|
|
|
468.9 |
|
|
Service Experts
|
|
|
135.9 |
|
|
|
135.9 |
|
|
Refrigeration
|
|
|
111.9 |
|
|
|
111.9 |
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
(16.4 |
) |
|
|
(16.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
700.3 |
|
|
$ |
700.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Profit (Loss)(A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
$ |
29.6 |
|
|
$ |
28.4 |
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heating and Cooling
|
|
|
34.3 |
|
|
|
32.8 |
|
|
Service Experts
|
|
|
(6.3 |
) |
|
|
(6.3 |
) |
|
Refrigeration
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
Corporate and other
|
|
|
(19.3 |
) |
|
|
(19.3 |
) |
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Profit
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
Reconciliation to income from continuing operations before
income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gains), losses and other expenses, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.5 |
) |
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
Other expense
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11.9 |
|
|
$ |
21.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
Segment profit is based upon income (loss) from continuing
operations before income taxes included in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations excluding Goodwill
Impairment. |
79
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SEGMENT REVENUES AND OPERATING PROFIT
For the Three Months and Six Months Ended June 30,
2005
(Unaudited, in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the | |
|
For the | |
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Six Months Ended | |
|
|
June 30, 2005 | |
|
June 30, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Previously | |
|
|
|
Previously | |
|
|
|
|
Reported | |
|
Restated | |
|
Reported | |
|
Restated | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
$ |
434.7 |
|
|
$ |
434.7 |
|
|
$ |
777.4 |
|
|
$ |
777.4 |
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
171.2 |
|
|
|
171.2 |
|
|
|
297.4 |
|
|
|
297.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heating and Cooling
|
|
|
605.9 |
|
|
|
605.9 |
|
|
|
1,074.8 |
|
|
|
1,074.8 |
|
|
Service Experts
|
|
|
167.8 |
|
|
|
167.8 |
|
|
|
303.7 |
|
|
|
303.7 |
|
|
Refrigeration
|
|
|
116.9 |
|
|
|
116.9 |
|
|
|
228.8 |
|
|
|
228.8 |
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
(22.8 |
) |
|
|
(22.8 |
) |
|
|
(39.2 |
) |
|
|
(39.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
867.8 |
|
|
$ |
867.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,568.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,568.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Profit (Loss)(A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
$ |
57.3 |
|
|
$ |
55.7 |
|
|
$ |
86.9 |
|
|
$ |
84.1 |
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
19.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heating and Cooling
|
|
|
72.6 |
|
|
|
70.4 |
|
|
|
106.9 |
|
|
|
103.2 |
|
|
Service Experts
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
Refrigeration
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
19.0 |
|
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
Corporate and other
|
|
|
(22.9 |
) |
|
|
(22.9 |
) |
|
|
(42.2 |
) |
|
|
(42.2 |
) |
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Profit
|
|
|
69.1 |
|
|
|
66.3 |
|
|
|
86.6 |
|
|
|
81.8 |
|
|
Reconciliation to income from continuing operations before
income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gains), losses and other expenses, net
|
|
|
(8.7 |
) |
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
|
|
(8.7 |
) |
|
|
(17.5 |
) |
|
|
Restructuring charge
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
71.6 |
|
|
$ |
66.1 |
|
|
$ |
83.5 |
|
|
$ |
87.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
Segment profit (loss) is based upon income (loss) from
continuing operations before income taxes included in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations excluding
Goodwill Impairment. |
80
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SEGMENT REVENUES AND OPERATING PROFIT
For the Three Months and Nine Months Ended September 30,
2005
(Unaudited, in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the | |
|
For the | |
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, 2005 | |
|
September 30, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Previously | |
|
|
|
Previously | |
|
|
|
|
Reported | |
|
Restated | |
|
Reported | |
|
Restated | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
$ |
464.9 |
|
|
$ |
464.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,242.3 |
|
|
$ |
1,242.3 |
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
191.9 |
|
|
|
191.9 |
|
|
|
489.3 |
|
|
|
489.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heating and Cooling
|
|
|
656.8 |
|
|
|
656.8 |
|
|
|
1,731.6 |
|
|
|
1,731.6 |
|
|
Service Experts
|
|
|
171.8 |
|
|
|
171.8 |
|
|
|
475.5 |
|
|
|
475.5 |
|
|
Refrigeration
|
|
|
119.6 |
|
|
|
119.6 |
|
|
|
348.4 |
|
|
|
348.4 |
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
(20.7 |
) |
|
|
(20.7 |
) |
|
|
(59.9 |
) |
|
|
(59.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
927.5 |
|
|
$ |
927.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,495.6 |
|
|
$ |
2,495.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Profit (Loss)(A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
$ |
67.0 |
|
|
$ |
65.0 |
|
|
$ |
153.9 |
|
|
$ |
149.1 |
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
26.8 |
|
|
|
25.9 |
|
|
|
46.8 |
|
|
|
45.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heating and Cooling
|
|
|
93.8 |
|
|
|
90.9 |
|
|
|
200.7 |
|
|
|
194.1 |
|
|
Service Experts
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
Refrigeration
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
31.0 |
|
|
|
28.8 |
|
|
Corporate and other
|
|
|
(28.5 |
) |
|
|
(28.5 |
) |
|
|
(70.7 |
) |
|
|
(70.7 |
) |
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Profit
|
|
|
85.2 |
|
|
|
81.2 |
|
|
|
171.8 |
|
|
|
163.0 |
|
|
Reconciliation to income from continuing operations before
income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gains), losses and other expenses, net
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(13.9 |
) |
|
|
(8.6 |
) |
|
|
(31.4 |
) |
|
|
Restructuring charge
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
Other expense
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
77.1 |
|
|
$ |
87.1 |
|
|
$ |
160.6 |
|
|
$ |
174.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
Segment profit (loss) is based upon income (loss) from
continuing operations before income taxes and cumulative effect
of accounting change included in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations excluding Goodwill Impairment. |
81
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of March 31, 2005
(unaudited, in millions, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Previously | |
|
|
|
|
Reported | |
|
Restated | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
ASSETS |
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
84.2 |
|
|
$ |
84.2 |
|
|
Accounts and notes receivable, net
|
|
|
450.2 |
|
|
|
449.8 |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
275.8 |
|
|
|
275.8 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
42.4 |
|
|
|
42.4 |
|
|
Assets held for sale
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
866.9 |
|
|
|
870.2 |
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, net
|
|
|
236.3 |
|
|
|
236.3 |
|
GOODWILL, net
|
|
|
222.5 |
|
|
|
222.5 |
|
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
82.1 |
|
|
|
82.1 |
|
OTHER ASSETS
|
|
|
137.3 |
|
|
|
137.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$ |
1,545.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,548.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
$ |
3.8 |
|
|
$ |
3.8 |
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
36.3 |
|
|
|
36.3 |
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
281.6 |
|
|
|
281.6 |
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
259.9 |
|
|
|
259.9 |
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
16.7 |
|
|
|
20.1 |
|
|
Liabilities held for sale
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
600.7 |
|
|
|
604.1 |
|
LONG-TERM DEBT
|
|
|
269.1 |
|
|
|
269.1 |
|
POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS, OTHER THAN PENSIONS
|
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
|
PENSIONS
|
|
|
105.1 |
|
|
|
105.1 |
|
OTHER LIABILITIES
|
|
|
78.6 |
|
|
|
78.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,068.2 |
|
|
|
1,071.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 25,000,000 shares
authorized, no shares issued or outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value, 200,000,000 shares
authorized, 67,005,959 shares issued
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
465.1 |
|
|
|
465.1 |
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
66.9 |
|
|
|
73.1 |
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(7.4 |
) |
|
|
(13.7 |
) |
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
(16.0 |
) |
|
|
(16.0 |
) |
|
Treasury stock, at cost, 3,106,822 shares
|
|
|
(32.4 |
) |
|
|
(32.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
476.9 |
|
|
|
476.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
$ |
1,545.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,548.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of June 30, 2005
(unaudited, in millions, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Previously | |
|
|
|
|
Reported | |
|
Restated | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
ASSETS |
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
93.6 |
|
|
$ |
93.6 |
|
|
Accounts and notes receivable, net
|
|
|
541.9 |
|
|
|
541.6 |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
257.5 |
|
|
|
257.5 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
41.7 |
|
|
|
41.7 |
|
|
Assets held for sale
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
950.8 |
|
|
|
952.1 |
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, net
|
|
|
238.1 |
|
|
|
238.1 |
|
GOODWILL, net
|
|
|
219.1 |
|
|
|
219.1 |
|
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
80.4 |
|
|
|
80.4 |
|
OTHER ASSETS
|
|
|
111.8 |
|
|
|
111.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$ |
1,600.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,601.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
294.7 |
|
|
|
294.7 |
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
282.7 |
|
|
|
282.7 |
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
38.9 |
|
|
|
40.4 |
|
|
Liabilities held for sale
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
629.5 |
|
|
|
631.0 |
|
LONG-TERM DEBT
|
|
|
263.0 |
|
|
|
263.0 |
|
POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS, OTHER THAN PENSIONS
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
PENSIONS
|
|
|
105.6 |
|
|
|
105.6 |
|
OTHER LIABILITIES
|
|
|
85.7 |
|
|
|
85.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,098.9 |
|
|
|
1,100.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 25,000,000 shares
authorized, no shares issued or outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value, 200,000,000 shares
authorized, 66,948,311 shares issued
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
463.9 |
|
|
|
463.9 |
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
105.6 |
|
|
|
108.1 |
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(23.5 |
) |
|
|
(26.2 |
) |
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
(13.0 |
) |
|
|
(13.0 |
) |
|
Treasury stock, at cost; 3,183,631 shares,
3,107,074 shares and 3,106,822 shares at
September 30, 2005, June 30, 2005 and March 31,
2005, respectively
|
|
|
(32.4 |
) |
|
|
(32.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
501.3 |
|
|
|
501.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
$ |
1,600.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,601.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of September 30, 2005
(unaudited, in millions, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Previously | |
|
|
|
|
Reported | |
|
Restated | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
ASSETS |
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
176.2 |
|
|
$ |
176.2 |
|
|
Accounts and notes receivable, net
|
|
|
567.4 |
|
|
|
567.4 |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
254.0 |
|
|
|
254.0 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
19.2 |
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
50.5 |
|
|
|
50.5 |
|
|
Assets held for sale
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,062.2 |
|
|
|
1,067.4 |
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, net
|
|
|
244.6 |
|
|
|
244.6 |
|
GOODWILL, net
|
|
|
225.6 |
|
|
|
225.6 |
|
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
85.3 |
|
|
|
85.3 |
|
OTHER ASSETS
|
|
|
121.4 |
|
|
|
121.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$ |
1,739.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,744.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
$ |
2.5 |
|
|
$ |
2.5 |
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
114.3 |
|
|
|
114.3 |
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
312.9 |
|
|
|
312.9 |
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
311.6 |
|
|
|
311.6 |
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
41.4 |
|
|
|
46.4 |
|
|
Liabilities held for sale
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
783.8 |
|
|
|
788.8 |
|
LONG-TERM DEBT
|
|
|
119.3 |
|
|
|
119.3 |
|
POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS, OTHER THAN PENSIONS
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
PENSIONS
|
|
|
106.1 |
|
|
|
106.1 |
|
OTHER LIABILITIES
|
|
|
80.5 |
|
|
|
80.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,105.2 |
|
|
|
1,110.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 25,000,000 shares
authorized, no shares issued or outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value, 200,000,000 shares
authorized, 68,313,156 shares, 66,948,311 shares and
67,005,959 shares issued at September 30, 2005,
June 30, 2005 and March 31, 2005, respectively
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
519.2 |
|
|
|
519.2 |
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
148.1 |
|
|
|
157.0 |
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.8 |
) |
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost, 3,183,631 shares,
3,107,074 shares and 3,106,822 shares at September 30,
2005, June 30, 2005 and March 31, 2005, respectively
|
|
|
(34.1 |
) |
|
|
(34.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
633.9 |
|
|
|
634.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
$ |
1,739.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,744.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
Financial results (in millions, except per share
data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales | |
|
Gross Profit | |
|
Net (Loss) Income | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
First Quarter
|
|
$ |
700.3 |
|
|
$ |
664.0 |
|
|
$ |
219.8 |
(1) |
|
$ |
225.6 |
|
|
$ |
12.5 |
(1)(3) |
|
$ |
(194.1 |
)(2) |
Second Quarter
|
|
|
867.8 |
|
|
|
805.4 |
|
|
|
291.2 |
(1) |
|
|
275.3 |
|
|
|
41.3 |
(1) |
|
|
34.4 |
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
927.5 |
|
|
|
771.9 |
|
|
|
311.4 |
(1) |
|
|
258.4 |
|
|
|
55.1 |
(1) |
|
|
19.0 |
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
870.6 |
|
|
|
741.4 |
|
|
|
285.6 |
|
|
|
238.2 |
|
|
|
41.8 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year
|
|
$ |
3,366.2 |
|
|
$ |
2,982.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,108.0 |
|
|
$ |
997.5 |
|
|
$ |
150.7 |
|
|
$ |
(134.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic | |
|
Diluted | |
|
Dividends | |
|
|
Earnings per | |
|
Earnings per | |
|
per | |
|
|
Common Share | |
|
Common Share | |
|
Common Share | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
First Quarter
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
(1)(3) |
|
$ |
(3.26 |
) |
|
$ |
0.19 |
(1)(3) |
|
$ |
(3.26 |
) |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
.095 |
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
0.67 |
(1) |
|
|
0.57 |
|
|
|
0.59 |
(1) |
|
|
0.51 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
.095 |
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
0.88 |
(1) |
|
|
0.32 |
|
|
|
0.76 |
(1) |
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
.095 |
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
0.59 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
0.55 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
.100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year
|
|
$ |
2.35 |
|
|
$ |
(2.24 |
) |
|
$ |
2.11 |
|
|
$ |
(2.24 |
) |
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Quarterly financial information has been restated. |
|
(2) |
In 2004, the Company recorded a
non-cash impairment
charge of $208.0 million, which is included as a component
of operating income in the accompanying Consolidated Statements
of Operations. |
|
(3) |
In 2005, the Company recorded $6.4 million of net income
related to open futures contracts as of December 31, 2004. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price Range Per Common Share | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
First Quarter
|
|
$ |
22.99 |
|
|
$ |
19.33 |
|
|
$ |
19.22 |
|
|
$ |
14.75 |
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
22.41 |
|
|
|
18.65 |
|
|
|
19.26 |
|
|
|
15.34 |
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
27.42 |
|
|
|
20.50 |
|
|
|
18.31 |
|
|
|
14.74 |
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
30.60 |
|
|
|
24.81 |
|
|
|
20.50 |
|
|
|
13.97 |
|
On September 19, 2005, LII announced its Board of Directors
had authorized a stock repurchase program, pursuant to which the
Company may repurchase up to ten million shares of its common
stock, and had terminated a prior repurchase program that was
announced November 2, 1999. Purchases under the stock
repurchase program are made on an open-market basis at
prevailing market prices. The timing of any repurchases depends
on market conditions, the market price of LIIs common
stock and managements assessment of the Companys
liquidity needs and investment requirements and opportunities.
No time limit was set for completion of the program and there is
no guarantee as to the exact number of shares that will be
repurchased. As of December 31, 2005, the Company had
repurchased 447,400 shares of common stock at an average
price of $28.65 per share under the stock repurchase
program.
85
|
|
17. |
Comprehensive Income: |
The accumulated balances, shown net of tax for each
classification of comprehensive income as of December 31,
2005, 2004 and 2003, are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation | |
|
Minimum | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment | |
|
Pension Liab. | |
|
Hedges | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
December 31, 2002
|
|
$ |
(40.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(37.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(78.7 |
) |
Net change during 2003
|
|
|
63.7 |
|
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
60.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
22.9 |
|
|
|
(42.4 |
) |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
(18.4 |
) |
Net change during 2004
|
|
|
23.0 |
|
|
|
(9.0 |
) |
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
19.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
45.9 |
|
|
$ |
(51.4 |
) |
|
$ |
6.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
Net change during 2005
|
|
|
(10.9 |
) |
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
35.0 |
|
|
$ |
(34.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net change in hedges during 2004 was $5.9 million, net
of tax of $(2.1) million, in reclassifications to earnings
and $2.1 million, net of tax of $(0.8) million, in
changes in the fair value of derivative contracts.
In 2005, the Company determined that these futures contracts did
not qualify for hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133,
as the Companys documentation did not meet the criteria
specified by SFAS No. 133 in order for the hedging
instruments to qualify for cash flow designation. Accordingly,
the Company recorded an unrealized gain of $23.3 million
for the year ended December 31, 2005 related to open
futures contracts, which is included (Gains), Losses and Other
Expenses, Net in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of
Operations for 2005. Additionally during 2005, the Company
realized pre-tax gains of $16.7 million related to futures
contracts that settled during the year, which is included in
(Gains), Losses and Other Expenses, Net in the accompanying
Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The Company evaluates the impairment of goodwill under the
guidance of SFAS No. 142, for each of its reporting
units. As a result of the annual impairment tests required by
SFAS No. 142 the Company recorded an impairment charge
in the first quarter of 2004 associated with its Service Experts
segment. This impairment charge reflects the segments
performance below managements expectations and
managements decision to divest of 48 centers that no
longer matched the realigned Service Experts business model. See
Note 6 Divestitures. The impairment test
requires a two-step process. The first step compares the fair
value of the units with goodwill against their aggregate
carrying values, including goodwill. The Company estimated the
fair value of its Service Experts segment using the income
method of valuation, which includes the use of estimated
discounted cash flows. Based on the comparison, the carrying
value of Service Experts exceeded its fair value. Accordingly,
the Company performed the second step of the test, comparing the
implied fair value of Service Experts goodwill with the
carrying amount of that goodwill. Based on this assessment, the
Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge of
$208.0 million ($184.8 million, net of tax), which is
included as a component of operating income in the accompanying
Consolidated Statements of Operations for 2004. The Company also
recognized a $14.8 million ($13.2 million, net of tax)
goodwill impairment charge arising from goodwill allocated to
centers held for sale. This amount is included as a part of loss
from discontinued operations in the accompanying Consolidated
Statements of Operations for 2004. During the first quarter of
2005, the Company performed its annual goodwill impairment test
and determined that no further impairment charge was required.
86
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill related to
continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2005
and 2004, by segment, are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance | |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
Goodwill | |
|
Foreign Currency | |
|
December 31, | |
Segment |
|
2003 | |
|
Impairment | |
|
Translation & Other | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Residential
|
|
$ |
26.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
26.1 |
|
Commercial
|
|
|
29.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
30.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heating and Cooling
|
|
|
55.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
56.8 |
|
Service Experts
|
|
|
306.7 |
|
|
|
(208.0 |
) |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
95.7 |
|
Refrigeration
|
|
|
70.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
72.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total for continuing operations
|
|
$ |
432.5 |
|
|
$ |
(208.0 |
) |
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
225.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
(14.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
447.3 |
|
|
$ |
(222.8 |
) |
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
225.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance | |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
Goodwill |
|
Foreign Currency | |
|
December 31, | |
Segment |
|
2004 | |
|
Impairment |
|
Translation & Other | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Residential
|
|
$ |
26.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
26.1 |
|
Commercial
|
|
|
30.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
28.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heating and Cooling
|
|
|
56.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
54.3 |
|
Service Experts
|
|
|
95.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
98.2 |
|
Refrigeration
|
|
|
72.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
71.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
225.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1.5 |
) |
|
$ |
223.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The change in the Service Experts segment in 2004 includes the
release of $9.2 million of liabilities for contingencies
that were established in connection with the acquisition of
Service Experts. Remaining changes are due to foreign currency
translation.
As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, identifiable intangible
assets, subject to amortization, are recorded in Other Assets in
the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets and are comprised
of the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Gross | |
|
Amortization | |
|
Gross | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
Amount | |
|
Amortization | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Deferred financing costs
|
|
$ |
5.8 |
|
|
$ |
(3.3 |
) |
|
$ |
8.9 |
|
|
$ |
(4.0 |
) |
Non-compete agreements and other
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
(7.7 |
) |
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
(7.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
14.9 |
|
|
$ |
(11.0 |
) |
|
$ |
18.2 |
|
|
$ |
(11.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets for the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 was approximately
$1.9 million, $3.6 million and $4.6 million,
respectively. Amortization expense for 2006 to 2010 is estimated
to be approximately $1.2 million in 2006, $0.7 million
in 2007, $0.6 million in 2008, $0.5 million in 2009
and $0.3 million in 2010. As of December 31, 2005, the
Company had $14.3 million of intangible assets, consisting
of $10.1 million of pension intangible assets and
$4.2 million of trademarks and others, which are not
subject to amortization.
|
|
19. |
Related Party Transactions: |
John W. Norris, Jr., LIIs Chairman of the Board,
Thomas W. Booth, Stephen R. Booth, David V. Brown
and John W. Norris III, each a director of Lennox, as
well as other LII stockholders who may be immediate family
members of the foregoing persons are, individually or through
trust arrangements, members
87
of AOC Land Investment, L.L.C. (AOC Land). AOC Land
owns 70% of AOC Development II, L.L.C. (AOC
Development), which owns essentially all of One Lake
Park, L.L.C. (One Lake Park). LII is leasing part of
an office building owned by One Lake Park for use as the LII
corporate headquarters. The lease, initiated in 1998, has a
remaining term of approximately 17 years and the lease
payments for 2005, 2004 and 2003 were approximately
$2.9 million, $3.2 million and $2.9 million,
respectively. LII also leased a portion of Lennox Center, a
retail complex owned by AOC Development, for use as offices. The
lease, initiated in 2000, terminated in March 2003 and the lease
payments for 2003 were $20,430. LII believes that the terms of
its leases with One Lake Park and AOC Development were,
when entered into, comparable to terms that could have been
obtained from unaffiliated third parties.
LII does not enter into any transactions in which it directors,
executive officers or principal stockholders and their
affiliates have a material interest unless such transactions are
approved by a majority of the disinterested members of its Board
of Directors and are on terms that are no less favorable to it
than those that it could obtain from unaffiliated third parties.
On July 27, 2000, the Board of Directors of the Company
declared a dividend of one right (Right) for each
outstanding share of its common stock to stockholders of record
at the close of business on August 7, 2000. Each Right
entitles the registered holder to purchase from the Company a
unit consisting of one
one-hundredth of a
share (a Fractional Share) of Series A Junior
Participating Preferred Stock, par value $.01 per share, at
a purchase price of $75.00 per Fractional Share, subject to
adjustment.
|
|
21. |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments: |
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts and
notes receivable, net, accounts payable and other current
liabilities approximate fair value due to the short maturities
of these instruments. The fair values of each of the
Companys long-term debt instruments are based on the
quoted market prices for the same issues or on the amount of
future cash flows associated with each instrument using current
market rates for debt instruments of similar maturities and
credit risk. The estimated fair value of non-convertible
long-term debt (including current maturities) was
$122.6 million and $160.8 million at December 31,
2005 and 2004, respectively. The fair values presented are
estimates and are not necessarily indicative of amounts for
which the Company could settle such instruments currently or
indicative of the intent or ability of the Company to dispose of
or liquidate them.
On February 7, 2006, Allied Air Enterprises, a division of
the Companys Heating & Cooling segment, announced
that it has commenced plans to consolidate its manufacturing,
distribution, research & development, and
administrative operations in South Carolina, and close its
current operations in Bellevue, Ohio. The consolidation will be
a phased process expected to be completed by the end of the
first quarter of fiscal 2007. The Company expects the
consolidation to improve Allied Air Enterprises operating
efficiency, eliminate redundant fixed costs, and provide
customers with improved service.
88
|
|
Item 9. |
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on
Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
None.
|
|
Item 9A. |
Controls and Procedures |
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and
with the participation of the Companys management,
including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer (the Companys principal executive officer and
principal financial officer, respectively), of the effectiveness
of its disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report and concluded that, as a result of
the material weakness identified in Managements Report on
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (Item 8), the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of
December 31, 2005 were not effective.
Managements Annual Report on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting
See Managements Report on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting included in Item 8
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Attestation Report of the Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm
See Attestation Report of the Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm included in Item 8
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During the quarter ended December 31, 2005, there were no
changes in the Companys internal control over financial
reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control
over financial reporting.
Remediation Efforts
In the first quarter of 2006, the Company engaged an outside
consultant to assist it in redesigning its policies, procedures,
and controls with respect to its commodity hedging activities in
order to comply with the requirements of SFAS 133 and the
Company does not plan to enter into any new contracts intended
to hedge its exposure to fluctuations in copper and aluminum
commodity prices until this process is completed.
|
|
Item 9B. |
Other Information |
None.
PART III
|
|
Item 10. |
Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant |
The section of the Companys 2006 Proxy Statement captioned
Proposal: Election of Directors identifies members
of the Board of Directors of the Company and nominees for
election to the Board of Directors at the Companys 2006
Annual Meeting, and is incorporated in this Item 10 by
reference.
Item 1 Business Executive Officers of the
Company of this
Form 10-K
identifies executive officers of the Company and is incorporated
in this Item 10 by reference.
The section of the Companys 2006 Proxy Statement captioned
Corporate Governance Board of Directors and
Board Committees Audit Committee identifies
members of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and the
Companys audit committee financial expert, and is
incorporated in this Item 10 by reference.
89
The section of the Companys 2006 Proxy Statement captioned
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance is incorporated in this Item 10 by
reference.
The section of the Companys 2006 Proxy Statement captioned
Corporate Governance Other Corporate
Governance Policies Code of Conduct and Code of
Ethical Conduct includes information regarding the
Companys Code of Conduct and Code of Ethical Conduct and
is incorporated in this Item 10 by reference.
|
|
Item 11. |
Executive Compensation |
The information in the sections of the Companys 2006 Proxy
Statement captioned Directors Compensation,
Executive Compensation and Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation is incorporated in this Item 11 by
reference.
|
|
Item 12. |
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management and Related Stockholder Matters |
The information in the sections of the Companys 2006 Proxy
Statement captioned Equity Compensation Plan
Information and Ownership of Common Stock is
incorporated in this Item 12 by reference.
|
|
Item 13. |
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions |
The information in the section of the Companys 2006 Proxy
Statement captioned Certain Relationships and Related
Party Transactions is incorporated in this Item 13 by
reference.
|
|
Item 14. |
Principal Accounting Fees and Services |
The information in the section of the Companys 2006 Proxy
Statement captioned Independent Registered Public
Accountants is incorporated in this Item 14 by
reference.
PART IV
|
|
Item 15. |
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules |
Financial Statements
The following financial statements are included in Part II,
Item 8 of this
Form 10-K:
|
|
|
|
|
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting |
|
|
|
Attestation Report of the Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm |
|
|
|
Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 |
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended
December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 |
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity for the
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 |
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the Years Ended
December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 |
Financial Statement Schedules
The following financial statement schedules are included in this
Form 10-K:
|
|
|
|
|
Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (see
Part II, Item 8 of this
Form 10-K).
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
and Reserves (see Schedule II immediately following the
signature page of this
Form 10-K).
|
Financial statement schedules not included in this
Form 10-K have
been omitted because they are not applicable or the required
information is shown in the Consolidated Financial Statements or
Notes thereto.
Exhibits
A list of the exhibits required to be filed or furnished as part
of this Form 10-K
is set forth in the Index to Exhibits, which immediately
precedes such exhibits, and is incorporated herein by reference.
91
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. |
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Robert E. Schjerven
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert E. Schjerven |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
March 16, 2006
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the registrant in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert E. Schjerven
Robert E. Schjerven |
|
Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive
Officer) |
|
March 16, 2006 |
|
/s/ Susan K. Carter
Susan K. Carter |
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
March 16, 2006 |
|
/s/ David L. Inman
David L. Inman |
|
Vice President, Controller and
Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
March 16, 2006 |
|
/s/ John W. Norris, Jr.
John W. Norris, Jr. |
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors |
|
March 16, 2006 |
|
/s/ Linda G. Alvarado
Linda G. Alvarado |
|
Director |
|
March 16, 2006 |
|
/s/ Steven R. Booth
Steven R. Booth |
|
Director |
|
March 16, 2006 |
|
/s/ Thomas W. Booth
Thomas W. Booth |
|
Director |
|
March 16, 2006 |
|
/s/ David V. Brown
David V. Brown |
|
Director |
|
March 16, 2006 |
|
/s/ James J. Byrne
James J. Byrne |
|
Director |
|
March 16, 2006 |
|
/s/ Janet K. Cooper
Janet K. Cooper |
|
Director |
|
March 16, 2006 |
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ C.L. (Jerry) Henry
C.L. (Jerry) Henry |
|
Director |
|
March 16, 2006 |
|
/s/ John E. Major
John E. Major |
|
Director |
|
March 16, 2006 |
|
/s/ John W. Norris III
John W. Norris III |
|
Director |
|
March 16, 2006 |
|
/s/ Paul W. Schmidt
Paul W. Schmidt |
|
Director |
|
March 16, 2006 |
|
/s/ Terry D. Stinson
Terry D. Stinson |
|
Director |
|
March 16, 2006 |
|
/s/ Richard L. Thompson
Richard L. Thompson |
|
Director |
|
March 16, 2006 |
93
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC.
SCHEDULE II VALUATION AND QUALIFYING
ACCOUNTS AND RESERVES
For the Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
(In Millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at | |
|
charged to | |
|
|
|
Balance | |
|
|
beginning | |
|
cost and | |
|
|
|
at end | |
|
|
of Year | |
|
expenses | |
|
Deductions (1) | |
|
of Year | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$ |
20.8 |
|
|
$ |
10.8 |
|
|
$ |
(16.0 |
) |
|
$ |
15.6 |
|
2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$ |
15.6 |
|
|
$ |
10.3 |
|
|
$ |
(7.4 |
) |
|
$ |
18.5 |
|
2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$ |
18.5 |
|
|
$ |
6.7 |
|
|
$ |
(8.5 |
) |
|
$ |
16.7 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Uncollectible accounts charged off, net of recoveries. |
94
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit Name |
|
|
|
|
3 |
.1 |
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Lennox International
Inc. (LII) (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to LIIs
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration
No. 333-75725) filed on April 6, 1999 and incorporated
herein by reference). |
|
3 |
.2 |
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of LII (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to
LIIs Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
February 28, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
4 |
.1 |
|
Specimen Stock Certificate for the Common Stock, par value
$.01 per share, of LII (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to
LIIs Amendment to Registration Statement on
Form S-1/A (Registration No. 333-75725) filed on
June 16, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
4 |
.2 |
|
Rights Agreement, dated as of July 27, 2000, between LII
and ChaseMellon Shareholder Services, L.L.C., as Rights Agent,
which includes as Exhibit A the form of Certificate of
Designations of Series A Junior Participating Preferred
Stock setting forth the terms of the Preferred Stock, as
Exhibit B the form of Rights Certificate and as
Exhibit C the Summary of Rights to Purchase Preferred Stock
(filed as Exhibit 4.1 to LIIs Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on July 28, 2000 and incorporated
herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
LII is a party to several debt instruments under which the total
amount of securities authorized under any such instrument does
not exceed 10% of the total assets of LII and its subsidiaries
on a consolidated basis. Pursuant to paragraph 4(iii)(A) of
Item 601(b) of Regulation S-K, LII agrees to furnish a
copy of such instruments to the Securities and Exchange
Commission upon request. |
|
10 |
.1 |
|
Second Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase Agreement,
dated as of June 16, 2003, by and among LPAC Corp., Lennox
Industries Inc., Blue Ridge Asset Funding Corporation, Liberty
Street Funding Corp., the Liberty Street Investors named
therein, The Bank of Nova Scotia and Wachovia Bank, N.A. (filed
as Exhibit 10.1 to LIIs Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 and
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
10 |
.2 |
|
Fourth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Receivables
Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 11, 2004, by and among
Lennox Industries Inc., LPAC Corp., Liberty Street Funding
Corp., the investors named in the Second Amended and Restated
Receivables Purchase Agreement, as amended (the Purchase
Agreement), The Bank of Nova Scotia, YC SUSI Trust, Bank
of America, N.A. and The Yorktown Investors (as defined in
Purchase Agreement) (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to LIIs
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
10 |
.3 |
|
Fifth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Receivables
Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 20, 2004, by and
among Lennox Industries Inc., LPAC Corp., Liberty Street Funding
Corp., the investors named in the Purchase Agreement, The Bank
of Nova Scotia, YC SUSI Trust, Bank of America, N.A. and The
Yorktown Investors (as defined in the Purchase Agreement) (filed
as Exhibit 10.1 to LIIs Form 8-K filed
December 21, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
10 |
.4 |
|
Sixth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Receivables
Purchase Agreement, dated December 14, 2005, by and among
Lennox Industries Inc., LPAC Corp., Liberty Street Funding
Corp., the investors named in the Purchase Agreement, The Bank
of Nova Scotia, YC SUSI Trust, Bank of America, National
Association and the Yorktown Investors (as defined in the
Purchase Agreement) (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to LIIs
Form 8-K filed December 20, 2005 and incorporated
herein by reference). |
|
10 |
.5 |
|
Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated as of May 5,
2004, by and among EagleFunding Capital Corporation and YC SUSI
Trust, Fleet National Bank and Bank of America, N.A., Fleet
Securities, Inc. and Bank of America, N.A., The Bank of Nova
Scotia and LPAC Corp. (filed as Exhibit 10.10 to LIIs
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
10 |
.6 |
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of June 19, 2000, by
and among Lennox Industries Inc., Heatcraft Inc. and LPAC Corp.
(filed as Exhibit 10.1 to LIIs Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000 and
incorporated herein by reference). |
95
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit Name |
|
|
|
|
10 |
.7 |
|
First Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of
June 7, 2002, among Lennox Industries Inc., Heatcraft Inc.,
Armstrong Air Conditioning Inc. and LPAC Corp. (filed as
Exhibit 10.2 to LIIs Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 and
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
10 |
.8 |
|
Second Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of
June 16, 2003, by and among LPAC Corp., Lennox Industries
Inc., Armstrong Air Conditioning Inc., Advanced Distributor
Products LLC and Heatcraft Refrigeration Products LLC (filed as
Exhibit 10.2 to LIIs Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 and
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
10 |
.9 |
|
Omnibus Amendment Number One to the Amended and Restated
Receivables Purchase Agreement and the Purchase and Sale
Agreement, dated as of January 31, 2003, by and among
Lennox Industries Inc., Heatcraft Inc., Armstrong Air
Conditioning Inc., Advanced Distributor Products LLC, Heatcraft
Refrigeration Products LLC, LPAC Corp., Blue Ridge Asset Funding
Corporation and Wachovia Bank, N.A. (filed as Exhibit 10.12
to LIIs Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
10 |
.10 |
|
First Omnibus Amendment to Transaction Documents, dated as of
December 31, 2003, among LII, Lennox Industries Inc.,
Advanced Distributor Products LLC, Heatcraft Refrigeration
Products LLC, LPAC Corp., Blue Ridge Asset Funding Corporation,
Wachovia Bank, N.A., Liberty Street Funding Corp., The Bank of
Nova Scotia, EagleFunding Capital Corporation, Fleet National
Bank, Fleet Securities Inc., and The Liberty Street Investors
(as defined therein) (filed as Exhibit 10.9 to LIIs
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
10 |
.11* |
|
Amended and Restated 1998 Incentive Plan of Lennox International
Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to LIIs Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 and
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
10 |
.12* |
|
Form of Performance Share Program Award Agreement under the 1998
Incentive Plan of LII (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to LIIs
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 13, 2005
and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
10 |
.13* |
|
Form of Employee Restricted Stock Grant Agreement under the 1998
Incentive Plan of LII (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to LIIs
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 13, 2005
and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
10 |
.14* |
|
Form of Employee Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement under the
1998 Incentive Plan of LII (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to
LIIs Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
December 13, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
10 |
.15* |
|
Form of Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Grant Agreement
under the 1998 Incentive Plan of LII (filed as Exhibit 10.6
to LIIs Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
December 13, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
10 |
.16* |
|
Form of Non-Employee Director Stock Appreciation Rights
Agreement under the 1998 Incentive Plan of LII (filed as
Exhibit 10.7 to LIIs Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on December 13, 2005 and incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
10 |
.17* |
|
Lennox International Inc. Profit Sharing Restoration Plan (filed
as Exhibit 10.9 to LIIs Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-75725) filed on
April 6, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
10 |
.18* |
|
Lennox International Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
(filed as Exhibit 10.10 to LIIs Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-75725)
filed on April 6, 1999 and incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
10 |
.19* |
|
Lennox International Inc. Non-employee Directors
Compensation and Deferral Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.22 to
LIIs Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
10 |
.20* |
|
Amendment to the Lennox International Inc. Non-employee
Directors Compensation and Deferral Plan, dated
May 17, 2002 (filed as Exhibit 10.23 to LIIs
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference). |
96
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit Name |
|
|
|
|
10 |
.21* |
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into between LII and
certain executive officers and directors of LII (filed as
Exhibit 10.15 to LIIs Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-75725) filed on
April 6, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
10 |
.22* |
|
Form of Employment Agreement entered into between LII and
certain executive officers of LII (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to
LIIs Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2000 and incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
10 |
.23* |
|
Form of Amended and Restated Change of Control Employment
Agreement entered into between LII and certain executive
officers of LII (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to LIIs
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
10 |
.24* |
|
Form of Change of Control Employment Agreement entered into
between LII and each of Susan K. Carter and William F.
Stoll, Jr. (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to LIIs
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 31, 2005
and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
10 |
.25 |
|
Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated July 8,
2005, among LII, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent,
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as syndication agent, Banc of America
Securities LLC and J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc., as Joint
Lead Arrangers, and the other Lenders party thereto (filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to LIIs Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on July 12, 2005 and incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
10 |
.26 |
|
Second Amended and Restated Pledge Agreement, dated July 8,
2005, between LII and Bank of America, N.A., as collateral agent
for itself and other creditors of LII under the Second Amended
and Restated Credit Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to
LIIs Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
July 12, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
10 |
.27* |
|
Summary of Fiscal 2006 Target Short-Term Incentive Percentages
for the Named Executive Officers of LII (filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to LIIs Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on December 13, 2005 and incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
10 |
.28* |
|
Summary of Fiscal 2006 Annual Compensation for the Non-Employee
Members of the Board of Directors of LII (filed as
Exhibit 10.2 to LIIs Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on December 13, 2005 and incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
21 |
.1 |
|
Subsidiaries of LII (filed herewith). |
|
23 |
.1 |
|
Consent of KPMG LLP (filed herewith). |
|
31 |
.1 |
|
Certification of the principal executive officer (filed
herewith). |
|
31 |
.2 |
|
Certification of the principal financial officer (filed
herewith). |
|
32 |
.1 |
|
Certification of the principal executive officer and the
principal financial officer of the Company pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (filed herewith). |
|
|
* |
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
97
exv21w1
EXHIBIT 21.1
Lennox International Inc. Subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Ownership |
|
Jurisdiction of Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
Lennox Industries Inc. |
|
100% |
|
Iowa |
SEE ANNEX A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heatcraft
Inc. |
|
100% |
|
Mississippi |
Bohn de Mexico S.A. de C.V. |
|
50% |
|
Mexico |
Frigus-Bohn S.A. de C.V. |
|
50% |
|
Mexico |
LGL de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. |
|
1% |
|
Mexico |
Lennox Participacoes Ltda. |
|
1% |
|
Brazil |
Frigo-Bohn do Brasil Ltda. |
|
99% |
|
Brazil |
Heatcraft do Brasil Ltda. |
|
100% |
|
Brazil |
Advanced Distributor Products LLC |
|
100% |
|
Delaware |
Heatcraft Refrigeration Products LLC |
|
100% |
|
Delaware |
Advanced Heat Transfer LLC |
|
50% |
|
Delaware |
LPAC Corp. |
|
5% |
|
Delaware |
|
|
|
|
|
Armstrong Air Conditioning Inc. |
|
100% |
|
Ohio |
JKS Co. |
|
100% |
|
Nebraska |
Armstrong Distributors Inc. |
|
100% |
|
Delaware |
LPAC Corp. |
|
5% |
|
Delaware |
LPAC Corp. II |
|
5% |
|
Delaware |
|
|
|
|
|
Heatcraft Technologies Inc. |
|
100% |
|
Delaware |
Alliance Compressor LLC |
|
24.5% |
|
Delaware |
LPAC Corp. |
|
80% |
|
Delaware |
LPAC Corp. II |
|
85% |
|
Delaware |
|
|
|
|
|
Excel Comfort Systems Inc. |
|
100% |
|
Delaware |
LPAC Corp. II |
|
5% |
|
Delaware |
|
|
|
|
|
Allied Air Enterprises Inc. |
|
100% |
|
Delaware |
|
|
|
|
|
Service Experts Inc. |
|
100% |
|
Delaware |
SEE ANNEX B |
|
|
|
|
Service Experts Alliance LLC |
|
100% |
|
Delaware |
SEE ANNEX C |
|
|
|
|
GM Development Center LLC |
|
100% |
|
Delaware |
Lennox Inc. |
|
100% |
|
Canada |
Lennox Canada Inc. |
|
100% |
|
Canada |
SEE ANNEX D |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lennox Global Ltd. |
|
100% |
|
Delaware |
SEE ANNEX E |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lennox Procurement Company Inc. |
|
100% |
|
Delaware |
|
|
|
|
|
Lake Park Insurance, Ltd. |
|
100% |
|
Bermuda |
ANNEX A
TO
EXHIBIT 21.1
Lennox Industries Inc. Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Ownership |
|
Jurisdiction of Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
Lennox Industries (Canada) Ltd. |
|
100% |
|
Canada |
|
|
|
|
|
LHP Holdings Inc. |
|
100% |
|
Delaware |
Lennox Hearth Products Inc. |
|
100% |
|
California |
Marcomp Inc. |
|
100% |
|
California |
LPAC Corp. II |
|
5% |
|
Delaware |
Cheminées Sécurité International Ltée |
|
100% |
|
Canada |
Security Chimneys International
USA Ltd. |
|
100% |
|
Delaware |
|
|
|
|
|
Products Acceptance Corporation |
|
100% |
|
Iowa |
|
|
|
|
|
Lennox Manufacturing Inc. |
|
100% |
|
Delaware |
|
|
|
|
|
LPAC Corp. |
|
10% |
|
Delaware |
|
|
|
|
|
Lennox Finance (No. 1) Limited Partnership |
|
88.9% |
|
Canada |
Lennox Finance (No. 2) Limited
Partnership |
|
90% |
|
Canada |
|
|
|
|
|
Lennox Finance (US) Inc. |
|
100% |
|
Delaware |
Lennox Finance (No. 1) Limited
Partnership |
|
11.1% |
|
Canada |
Lennox Finance (No. 2) Limited
Partnership |
|
10% |
|
Canada |
ANNEX B
TO
EXHIBIT 21.1
Service Experts Inc. Subsidiaries
The following are all organized in the state indicated and owned 100% by Service Experts Inc.,
unless otherwise noted:
A. Frank Woods and Sons LLC Virginia
AC/DAC, LLC Tennessee
Air Experts LLC Georgia
Air Experts LLC Ohio
Aire-Tech LLC Ohio
Allbritten Plumbing, Heating and Air Conditioning Service, Inc. Tennessee
Andros Refrigeration LLC Arizona
Arrow Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. Wisconsin
Artic Aire of Chico, Inc. California
Atmostemp LLC New Jersey
Austin Brothers LLC Tennessee
Barlow Heating and Air Conditioning LLC Delaware
Becht Heating & Cooling LLC Delaware
Ben Peer Heating LLC New York
Berkshire Air Conditioning LLC Tennessee
Broad Ripple Heating & Air Conditioning LLC Delaware
C. Iapaluccio Company LLC Connecticut
Calverley Air Conditioning & Heating LLC Delaware
Chief/Bauer Heating & Air Conditioning LLC Delaware
Climate Control LLC Alabama
Climate Design Heating and Air Conditioning LLC Delaware
Climate Design Systems LLC Delaware
Climate Masters Service LLC Colorado
Coastal Air Conditioning Service LLC Georgia
Comfort Masters Heating & Cooling LLC Delaware
Comfort Tech Cooling & Heating LLC Tennessee
Comfortech LLC Tennessee
Cook Heating & Air Conditioning LLC Michigan
Cook Heating and Air Conditioning LLC Delaware
Cool Breeze LLC Ohio
D.A. Bennett LLC New York
Dial One Raymond Plumbing, Heating & Cooling, Inc. Tennessee
DiMarco Mechanical LLC Ohio
Dodge Heating & Air Conditioning LLC Georgia
Doler Plumbing & Heating LLC Delaware
ANNEX B
TO
EXHIBIT 21.1
Service Experts Inc. Subsidiaries (contd.)
Economy Heating & Air Conditioning LLC Pennsylvania
Epperson LLC South Carolina
Eveready LLC Virginia
Falso Service Experts LLC New York
Fras-Air Contracting LLC* New Jersey
Freschi Air Systems, Inc. Tennessee
General Conditioning LLC* New Jersey
GM Development Center LLC Delaware
Golden Seal Heating & Air Conditioning LLC Delaware
Gordons Specialty Company LLC Oklahoma
Gregorys Plumbing Co. LLC Oklahoma
H.S. Stevenson & Sons LLC Ohio
Holmes Sales & Service LLC Iowa
Industrial Building Services LLC Florida
Jack Nelson Co. LLC Oklahoma
Klawinski LLC Delaware
Knochelmann Plumbing, Heating & Air LLC Kentucky
Krugers Heating & Air Conditioning LLC Delaware
Lake Arbor Heating LLC Colorado
Mathews Heating & Air Conditioning LLC Tennessee
Matz Heating & Air Conditioning LLC New York
McPhee Service Experts, Inc. Colorado
Metro-Tech Service Co. Delaware
Midland Heating and Air Conditioning LLC South Carolina
Miller Refrigeration, A/C, & Htg. Co. North Carolina
Neal Harris Heating, Air Conditioning & Plumbing LLC Missouri
Norrell Heating and Air Conditioning LLC Alabama
Pardee Refrigeration LLC South Carolina
Parker-Pearce Service Experts LLC Maryland
Parrott Mechanical, Inc. Idaho
Peachtree Service Experts LLC Georgia
Peitz Heating and Cooling LLC South Dakota
R&M Climate Control LLC Tennessee
Roland J. Down LLC New York
Rolf Griffin Heating & Air Conditioning LLC Delaware
Ryan Heating LLC Missouri
ANNEX B
TO
EXHIBIT 21.1
Service Experts Inc. Subsidiaries (contd.)
San Antonio Air Conditioning LLC Delaware
Sanders Indoor Comfort LLC South Carolina
Sanders Service Experts, Inc. Tennessee
Sedgwick Heating & Air Conditioning LLC Minnesota
SEITN GP, Inc. Tennessee
Service Experts DFW LLC Tennessee
Service Experts of Denver LLC Colorado
Service Experts of Houston LLC Delaware
Service Experts of Imperial Valley, Inc. California
Service Experts of Indiana LLC Tennessee
Service Experts of Memphis LLC Tennessee
Service Experts of Northeast Louisiana LLC Louisiana
Service Experts of Northwest Louisiana LLC Louisiana
Service Experts of Orange California
Service Experts of Salt Lake City LLC Tennessee
Service Experts of the Bay Area, Inc. California
Service Experts of the Berkshires LLC Delaware
Service Experts of the Triangle LLC North Carolina
Service Experts of Utah LLC Delaware
Service Experts of Washington LLC Delaware
Service Experts, LLC Florida
Service Now, Inc. California
Steel City Heating & Air LLC Alabama
Strand Brothers LLC Tennessee
Strogens HVAC LLC New Hampshire
Sunbeam Service Experts LLC New York
Sunset Service Experts LLC New York
Sylvesters LLC Tennessee
Teays Valley Heating and Cooling LLC West Virginia
The McElroy Service Co. LLC Nebraska
TML LLC Idaho
Valentine Heating & Air Conditioning LLC Georgia
Wesley G. Wood LLC Pennsylvania
|
|
|
*
|
|
10% membership interest owned by Class B member/employee as bona fide company
representative for state licensing purposes. |
ANNEX C
TO
EXHIBIT 21.1
Service Experts Alliance LLC Subsidiaries
The following are all organized in the state indicated and owned 100% by Service Experts Alliance
LLC, unless otherwise noted:
Alliance Mechanical Heating and Air Conditioning, Inc. California
C. Woods Company LLC Delaware
Greenwood Heating & A/C LLC Washington
Jebco Heating & Air Conditioning LLC Colorado
Kozon LLC Tennessee
Lee Voisard Plumbing & Heating LLC Ohio
Service Experts of Northeast Ohio LLC Ohio
ANNEX D
TO
EXHIBIT 21.1
Lennox Canada Inc. Subsidiaries
The following are all organized in Canada and owned 100% by Lennox Canada Inc.:
Bryant Heating & Cooling Co. Ltd.
Bryant Newco Inc.
Dearie Contracting Inc.
Dearie Contracting Ottawa Inc.
Dearie Martino Contractors Ltd.
GAIA Enterprises Inc.
Welldone Plumbing, Heating & Air Conditioning (1990) Ltd.
HVAC Fireplace Installations Inc.
Overland R.N.C. Inc.
ANNEX E
TO
EXHIBIT 21.1
Lennox Global Ltd. Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Ownership |
|
Jurisdiction of Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
Heatcraft Refrigeration Asia Pte Ltd. |
|
100% |
|
Rep. of Singapore |
Heatcraft Refrigeration (Wuxi)
Co. Ltd. |
|
100% |
|
China |
Heatcraft Cooling Technology
(Wuxi) Co., Ltd |
|
100% |
|
China |
|
|
|
|
|
LGL Europe Holding Co. |
|
100% |
|
Delaware |
SEE ANNEX F |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UK Industries, Inc. |
|
100% |
|
Delaware |
|
|
|
|
|
Lennox Participacoes Ltda. |
|
99% |
|
Brazil |
|
|
|
|
|
Frigo-Bohn do Brasil Ltda. |
|
1% |
|
Brazil |
|
|
|
|
|
Strong LGL Dominicana, S.A. |
|
100% |
|
Dominican Republic |
|
|
|
|
|
LGL Belgium S.P.R.L. |
|
0.4% |
|
Belgium |
|
|
|
|
|
LGL Australia (US) Inc. |
|
100% |
|
Delaware |
SEE ANNEX G |
|
|
|
|
ANNEX F
TO
EXHIBIT 21.1
LGL Europe Holding Co. Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Ownership |
|
Jurisdiction of Inc. |
LGL Holland B.V. |
|
100% |
|
Netherlands |
|
|
|
|
|
Ets. Brancher S.A.S. |
|
100% |
|
France |
LGL France S.A.S. |
|
100% |
|
France |
LGL Refrigeration UK Ltd. |
|
100% |
|
United Kingdom |
Hyfra Ind. GmbH |
|
0.1% |
|
Germany |
Lennox France S.A.S. |
|
100% |
|
France |
Lennox Refac, S.A. |
|
0.1% |
|
Spain |
|
|
|
|
|
LGL Germany GmbH |
|
100% |
|
Germany |
LGL Deutschland GmbH |
|
100% |
|
Germany |
Hyfra Ind. GmbH |
|
99.9% |
|
Germany |
Lennox Deutschland GmbH |
|
100% |
|
Germany |
|
|
|
|
|
Lennox Global Spain S.L. |
|
100% |
|
Spain |
LGL Refrigeration Spain S.A. |
|
100% |
|
Spain |
Aldo Marine |
|
100% |
|
Spain |
Lennox Refac, S.A. |
|
99.9% |
|
Spain |
Redi sur Andalucia |
|
70% |
|
Spain |
Lennox Climatizacao Lda |
|
100% |
|
Portugal |
|
|
|
|
|
LGL Refrigeration Italia s.r.l. |
|
99% |
|
Italy |
|
|
|
|
|
Lennox Polska s.p.z.o.o. |
|
100% |
|
Poland |
|
|
|
|
|
LGL Belgium S.P.R.L. |
|
99.6% |
|
Belgium |
|
|
|
|
|
Lennox Benelux B.V. |
|
100% |
|
Netherlands |
Lennox Benelux N.V. |
|
100% |
|
Belgium |
Lennox Zao |
|
1% |
|
Russia |
|
|
|
|
|
HCF Lennox Ltd. |
|
100% |
|
United Kingdom |
Lennox Industries Limited (UK) |
|
100% |
|
United Kingdom |
Environheat Limited |
|
100% |
|
United Kingdom |
|
|
|
|
|
Lennox Janka a.s. |
|
100% |
|
Czech Republic |
Janka Slovensko S.R.O. |
|
100% |
|
Slovak Republic |
Ecoclima |
|
15% |
|
Czech Republic |
|
|
|
|
|
Lennox Zao |
|
99% |
|
Russia |
|
|
|
|
|
Lennox Airconditioning Ireland Limited |
|
100% |
|
Ireland |
ANNEX G
TO
EXHIBIT 21.1
LGL Australia (US) Inc. Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Ownership |
|
Jurisdiction of Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
LGL Co Pty Ltd |
|
100% |
|
Australia |
LGL Australia Investment Pty Ltd |
|
100% |
|
Australia |
LGL Australia Finance Pty Ltd |
|
10% |
|
Australia |
LGL Australia Finance Pty Ltd |
|
90% |
|
Australia |
LGL Australia Holdings Pty Ltd |
|
100% |
|
Australia |
Lennox Australia Pty Ltd. |
|
100% |
|
Australia |
AL GL Pty Ltd |
|
100% |
|
Australia |
LGL Refrigeration Pty Ltd |
|
100% |
|
Australia |
Y. Brick E Pty Ltd |
|
100% |
|
Australia |
Heatcraft Australia Pty Ltd |
|
100% |
|
Australia |
Kirby
Refrigeration Pty Ltd |
|
|
|
|
(Albury) |
|
75% |
|
Australia |
Kirby
Refrigeration Pty Ltd |
|
|
|
|
(Sunshine Coast) |
|
75% |
|
Australia |
Kirby Refrigeration
(Geelong) Pty Ltd |
|
75% |
|
Australia |
Kirby
Refrigeration Pty Ltd |
|
|
|
|
(Gold Coast) |
|
100% |
|
Australia |
Kirby
Refrigeration Pty Ltd |
|
|
|
|
(Tasmania) |
|
75% |
|
Australia |
Y. Brick (Hobart) Pty Ltd |
|
100% |
|
Australia |
RHW Pty Ltd (Vic) |
|
100% |
|
Australia |
RHW Pty Ltd (SA) |
|
100% |
|
Australia |
Wholesale RH
Pty Ltd |
|
100% |
|
Australia |
Kirby
Refrigeration Pty Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
(NT) |
|
100% |
|
Australia |
Y. Brick TCC Pty Ltd |
|
100% |
|
Australia |
Y. Brick SM Pty Ltd |
|
100% |
|
Australia |
Y. Brick CW Pty Ltd. |
|
100% |
|
Australia |
Kulthorn Kirby Public
Company Limited |
|
20% |
|
Australia |
Kulthorn Control
Company Limited |
|
70% |
|
Australia |
Thai Sintered
Products Co. Limited |
|
44.4% |
|
Thailand |
Thai Compressor
Manufacturing Co.
Limited |
|
25.5% |
|
Thailand |
Kulthorn Kirby
Foundry Co. Limited |
|
100% |
|
Australia |
J.N.K. Pty Limited |
|
100% |
|
Australia |
P.R.L. Pty Limited |
|
100% |
|
Australia |
JNK Draughting Pty Limited |
|
100% |
|
Australia |
P.R.L Sales Pty Limited |
|
100% |
|
Australia |
Air Safe Pty Limited |
|
100% |
|
Australia |
Heatcraft New Zealand Limited |
|
100% |
|
New Zealand |
exv23w1
Exhibit 23.1
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of
Lennox International Inc.:
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-83961,
333-86989, 333-92389, 333-52046, 333-71416, 333-91128, 333-91130, 333-83959, 333-60122 and
333-127540 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 333-102881 on Form S-3 and Registration No.
333-81555 on Form S-4 of Lennox International Inc. of our reports dated March 16, 2006, with
respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Lennox International Inc. as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three-years ended December 31, 2005 and the related financial statement schedule and
managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, as of
December 31, 2005 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December
31, 2005, which reports are included herein.
Our audit report dated March 16, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Lennox International Inc. as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three-years ended December 31, 2005 and the related financial statement schedulerefers to the adoption of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standard No. 123 (revised 2004), Share Based Payment.
Our report dated March 16, 2006, on managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2005, expresses our opinion that the Company did not maintain effective internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, because of the effect of material
weaknesses on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria and contains an explanatory
paragraph that states that the following material weakness has been identified and included in
managements assessment as of December 31, 2005:
|
|
The Company did not maintain effectively designed internal controls to ensure accounting for derivative
financial instrument transactions in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Specifically,
the Company did not have policies and procedures in place to ensure compliance with requirements to prepare
contemporaneous documentation and assess hedge effectiveness at the inception of certain derivative financial
instrument transactions. Furthermore, the Company did not have policies and procedures in place to review the
propriety of accounting for certain commodity futures contract transactions subsequent to the inception of such
contracts. These deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting resulted in material errors related to
the recognition and classification of gains and losses on derivative contracts, and resulted in restatements of
the Companys previously-filed interim consolidated financial statements for the first three quarters of the
year-ended December 31, 2005. |
/s/ KPMG LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 16, 2006
exv31w1
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Robert E. Schjerven, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Lennox International Inc.; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
(a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; |
|
|
(b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles; |
|
|
(c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and |
|
|
(d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
(a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and |
|
|
(b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: March 16, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert E. Schjerven
|
|
|
Robert E. Schjerven |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
exv31w2
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Susan K. Carter, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Lennox International Inc.; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
(a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; |
|
|
(b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles; |
|
|
(c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and |
|
|
(d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
(a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and |
|
|
(b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: March 16, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Susan K. Carter
|
|
|
Susan K. Carter |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
exv32w1
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report of Lennox International Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned, Robert E. Schjerven, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, and Susan K. Carter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to his or her knowledge:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert E. Schjerven
|
|
|
Robert E. Schjerven |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 16, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Susan K. Carter |
|
|
Susan K. Carter |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 16, 2006 |
|
|
A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request. The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
as an exhibit to the Report.